Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
23 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

@jersey cubs fan and @CubUgly is there some sort of bad Cubs history with this guy? He used to work in Chicago, right?

I only knew him through the podcast he did with Kap but you get a much better idea of who they are when you hear them.  He was very political and very heavy-handidly one sided politically - and was especially outspoken during Covid - and I had to quit listening to that podcast because that's not why I listen - I can go to 100 different podcasts if that's what I wanted to listen to and I told them as much in the comments.....he kept on so I moved on - I'm sure they could have cared less. 

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
2 hours ago, ToolDRT said:

I think we should sell, sell, sell. Unless you want to extend Belli (they won’t) no point on trying to win it with this team. They just aren’t good enough. 
 

In other news, have you guys ever considered having a separate thread for all trade deadline news and rumors? That’s way it’s all in one place and you can pick up right where you left off in the morning. 

why are you assuming they won't extend bellinger? he fits in perfectly with what they're trying to do long-term and he's getting under 200 million, which means he's in the cubs price range. 

Posted
Just now, 17 Seconds said:

why are you assuming they won't extend bellinger? he fits in perfectly with what they're trying to do long-term and he's getting under 200 million, which means he's in the cubs price range. 

Not me, but there is a 0% change that Bellinger would forego free agency at this point unless the Cubs were willing to overpay excessively.  The Cubs could absolutely resign him in the offseason if they offer the most money, but Boras isn't going to take Bellinger off the market without seeing all the options out there.

Posted
Just now, Hrubes20 said:

Not me, but there is a 0% change that Bellinger would forego free agency at this point unless the Cubs were willing to overpay excessively.  The Cubs could absolutely resign him in the offseason if they offer the most money, but Boras isn't going to take Bellinger off the market without seeing all the options out there.

oh, i thought he meant they won't keep bellinger at all, but you're right,. he probably meant there's no chance at an in-season extension.

Posted

Money is obviously the main determining factor, but it's not the end all be all, and the Cubs as a .500 team giving up and trading their best offensive player is a pretty big negative in terms of their sales pitch to Bellinger in the offseason. 

This isn't a 'these kids make too many damn money' argument....far from it, but it's worth pointing out that Bellinger, due to his early career success, has already made $58m in his career. This isn't a Contreras situation ($22m career going into the last offseason), there's probably some personal preference that's going to impact this decision. 

Posted
1 hour ago, 17 Seconds said:

why are you assuming they won't extend bellinger? he fits in perfectly with what they're trying to do long-term and he's getting under 200 million, which means he's in the cubs price range. 

I just don’t see them dishing out a long term deal for Bellinger. I think they’re probably comfortable with what’s coming through the system as far as outfield bats, plus Seiya and Happ are already signed. I could be way off base, but I don’t see us even attempting to resign him. I think he was strictly acquired to flip. 
 

Not saying I agree with this like of thinking mind you. That’s just my guess on that particular player. 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, ToolDRT said:

I think we should sell, sell, sell. Unless you want to extend Belli (they won’t) no point on trying to win it with this team. They just aren’t good enough. 
 

In other news, have you guys ever considered having a separate thread for all trade deadline news and rumors? That’s way it’s all in one place and you can pick up right where you left off in the morning. 

Our new ownership is not a fan of megathreads.  In the past pretty much all of our discussions were megathreads.  It takes some getting used to but its fine.  Brock thinks it will elicit more conversation and activity if we make separate threads for things.

With regards to selling, it seems like Jed is looking for a reason not to sell.  The only way I'd be ok with selling is if there were some elite prospects being offered...it sounds stupid to say this but more 40-45 FV prospects isn't a big needle mover for me and eventually there will be a 40 man reckoning.  At some point we'll need to consolidate some of that depth.

 

Edited by UMFan83
Posted

Tired of the sell sell sell stigma,  it's time to do something different like adding to a core.  Obviously seems as tho we are so afraid of creating a core to work off of since 2016's. Let's get real Everyone who come to play for Chicago's Cubs loves playing for the cubs understandably, so let's embrace what we have created. Cubs finally steered away from the norm of picking up veterans. To  make that push.  We finally now have a farm league that is no joke for years to come.  I say start adding.  Enough of this sell mentality.  FYI ... P.C.A., Canario, Brennan Davis, Ben Brown, Wesneski, Matt Mervis. Let's Go! 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, LowCountryCubFan said:

Tired of the sell sell sell stigma,  it's time to do something different like adding to a core.  Obviously seems as tho we are so afraid of creating a core to work off of since 2016's. Let's get real Everyone who come to play for Chicago's Cubs loves playing for the cubs understandably, so let's embrace what we have created. Cubs finally steered away from the norm of picking up veterans. To  make that push.  We finally now have a farm league that is no joke for years to come.  I say start adding.  Enough of this sell mentality.  FYI ... P.C.A., Canario, Brennan Davis, Ben Brown, Wesneski, Matt Mervis. Let's Go! 

Welcome!

  • Like 1
Posted

I think Jed has to decide by tonight which direction he's going in order to give him enough time to have the discussions with other teams he's going to need to have before the deadline approaches. He doesn't have to necessarily pull the trigger yet, but general frameworks have to be discussed. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I think Jed has to decide by tonight which direction he's going in order to give him enough time to have the discussions with other teams he's going to need to have before the deadline approaches. He doesn't have to necessarily pull the trigger yet, but general frameworks have to be discussed. 

I think he's probably explored trade talks for both buy and sell scenarios.  I agree he'll have to start moving soon.

I can't see them selling at this point, even if we lose the next 2 games.  Cubs have the 3rd best run differential in the NL. Our biggest weakness now is our pitching which is just average and we have largely the same starting staff as last year that went on a big roll in the 2nd half.

I'm excited for a Gary Gaetti, Fred McGriff, Castellanos type addition to the offense hopefully.

Posted

Jesse Rogers said the Cubs could trade Stroman to give themselves more luxury tax space to make more moves elsewhere .

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Stratos said:

I think he's probably explored trade talks for both buy and sell scenarios.  I agree he'll have to start moving soon.

I can't see them selling at this point, even if we lose the next 2 games.  Cubs have the 3rd best run differential in the NL. Our biggest weakness now is our pitching which is just average and we have largely the same starting staff as last year that went on a big roll in the 2nd half.

I'm excited for a Gary Gaetti, Fred McGriff, Castellanos type addition to the offense hopefully.

Remember McGriff agonizing about coming to Chicago? horsefeathers him.   

Posted
38 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I think Jed has to decide by tonight which direction he's going in order to give him enough time to have the discussions with other teams he's going to need to have before the deadline approaches. He doesn't have to necessarily pull the trigger yet, but general frameworks have to be discussed. 

I think they will make that decision after sundays game . Jesse Rogers said they will wait until the 11th hour to make the decision . 

North Side Contributor
Posted
26 minutes ago, Dfan25 said:

Jesse Rogers said the Cubs could trade Stroman to give themselves more luxury tax space to make more moves elsewhere .

 

 

This is both infuriating (the Cubs should not be, in any way, concerned with going over the luxury tax) but also interesting (in that they'll still lose Stroman at seasons end) in that maybe they can use prospects to get a controllable arm.

Posted
5 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

This is both infuriating (the Cubs should not be, in any way, concerned with going over the luxury tax) but also interesting (in that they'll still lose Stroman at seasons end) in that maybe they can use prospects to get a controllable arm.

I think this tells you all you need to know about their likelihood of being involved with Ohtani. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
9 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I think this tells you all you need to know about their likelihood of being involved with Ohtani. 

Well that was always a pipe dream with this ownership. The idea of moving Stroman while trying to add some longer term pieces is definitely intriguing. I could get behind that. But absolutely laughable they'd have to shed salary to add at the deadline because the Rickett's are so terrified of the tax.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I think this tells you all you need to know about their likelihood of being involved with Ohtani. 

From Tom and Jed's mouth straight to Jesse's ears. 

North Side Contributor
Posted
2 minutes ago, mul21 said:

Bowden suggesting a trade where the Cubs bring back more OFs is just comical.  Does he pay any attention at all to organizational needs?

https://theathletic.com/4725542/2023/07/27/mlb-trade-deadline-scenarios/

Cubs trade CF Cody Bellinger to Phillies for OF Gabriel Rincones Jr. and OF Carlos De La Cruz

There's not better evidence for why Jim Bowden was a terrible GM than to read any article he writes.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 1908_Cubs said:

There's not better evidence for why Jim Bowden was a terrible GM than to read any article he writes.

If he didn't have the name, people would honestly think his trade ideas are just some random message board follower and not a former General manager.  He's absolutely clueless. 

  • Haha 1
North Side Contributor
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

If he didn't have the name, people would honestly think his trade ideas are just some random message board follower and not a former General manager.  He's absolutely clueless. 

Great minds think alike.  I said that his recent trade idea involving the Cubs and the Astros felt like something you'd read on an Astros blog.  He's the worst.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...