Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
But at least maybe there's a logical plan happening with some of these cuts and signings (reinvesting from the D to the O)

 

 

That is what I was saying yesterday. It could be that the focus is on the Bears fixing the QB/offense. They don't need to win more games, they need to score more points. So go all in with offense, sign and draft QBs, acquire more skill position guys, do whatever you can to score more points in 2021. If you create a real offense, then go patch up the defense next.

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Also looks like they did include void years for Dalton. So only a 5.5m cap hit for 2021.

 

I know many will complain about kicking the can down the road, but as long as you're going for it, might as well maximize the effort. Squeeze whatever you can to build the best 2021 team. Don't like half ass a 2021 effort.

Posted

"I have limited resources, and feel really good about my ability to coach up defense, so I'm going to concentrate my resources on offense" is ironically the same exact thing Jed Hoyer is trying.

 

Jed has earned a benefit of the doubt with me that Pace hasn't, and I'm already annoyed with the particulars, but it's not a bad plan.

Community Moderator
Posted
But at least maybe there's a logical plan happening with some of these cuts and signings (reinvesting from the D to the O)

 

 

That is what I was saying yesterday. It could be that the focus is on the Bears fixing the QB/offense. They don't need to win more games, they need to score more points. So go all in with offense, sign and draft QBs, acquire more skill position guys, do whatever you can to score more points in 2021. If you create a real offense, then go patch up the defense next.

 

Like I said, getting rid of Fuller and/or Hicks is fine on the surface. It's logical. It makes sense. The issue is "going all in with offense" so far is Andy Dalton and Germain Ifedi. They are literally NO better on offense right now, and are down 2 roster spots and 10M in 2021 cap. Dalton was worse than Trubisky and Foles. Ifedi was already a 16-game starter on a below average OL.

 

I know Andy Dalton isn't the end game here. But even if they get Golladay to sign here, Golladay, Robinson, Mooney, Graham, Kmet, Cohen, Montgomery isn't like to score enough with Dalton, a still bad OL, and Nagy as coach/playcaller. And at this point, the Bears are either going to upgrade at tackle or at QB, probably not both, especially if they end up with Golladay. They are either going to somehow still get Wilson/Watson and then not have a draft pick for OT. Or they are going to move up in the draft for a QB, and not have a pick for OT. Or they are going to get an OT in the draft and roll with Dalton. The only way this ends in an offense that scores more points is if they get Wilson/Watson or if they decide to cut Leno, get a cheap improvement at OT and the rookie QB comes in and is great. Maybe an outside shot if they get Golladay and trade Robinson for draft picks good enough to get everything they want, but then WR is a lateral difference from last year.

Community Moderator
Posted
I understand cost was a concern and Trufant is on a 1-year deal, but it was said in this thread that not extending or cutting a 30-year old CB is a wise move (paraphrasing). Trufant will turn 31 early in the season. Fuller is 29 until after the 2021 season. So, the Bears actually got a year and a half older at the CB position.
Community Moderator
Posted

 

There's no way I would pay 30Mil (Arob 18, KG 12) to the WR position, even if just for 1 year. This has to mean trade for Robinson if Golladay signs that offer.

 

Sent from my SM-A115AZ using Tapatalk

Posted

There's no way I would pay 30Mil (Arob 18, KG 12) to the WR position, even if just for 1 year. This has to mean trade for Robinson if Golladay signs that offer.

 

Sent from my SM-A115AZ using Tapatalk

Biggs had already claimed their plan is to pair them.

Community Moderator
Posted

There's no way I would pay 30Mil (Arob 18, KG 12) to the WR position, even if just for 1 year. This has to mean trade for Robinson if Golladay signs that offer.

 

Sent from my SM-A115AZ using Tapatalk

Biggs had already claimed their plan is to pair them.

 

Yeah, I'm aware. That doesn't mean he's right. Nor does it make it a wise move. Though, getting 2 3rd round comp picks if both sign elsewhere would be phenomenal.

Posted

There's no way I would pay 30Mil (Arob 18, KG 12) to the WR position, even if just for 1 year. This has to mean trade for Robinson if Golladay signs that offer.

 

Sent from my SM-A115AZ using Tapatalk

Biggs had already claimed their plan is to pair them.

 

Yeah, I'm aware. That doesn't mean he's right. Nor does it make it a wise move. Though, getting 2 3rd round comp picks if both sign elsewhere would be phenomenal.

As far as whether its smart or not, okay.

 

Whether Biggs has good info? Pretty likely. He's usually solid when he reports.

Community Moderator
Posted

Biggs had already claimed their plan is to pair them.

 

Yeah, I'm aware. That doesn't mean he's right. Nor does it make it a wise move. Though, getting 2 3rd round comp picks if both sign elsewhere would be phenomenal.

As far as whether its smart or not, okay.

 

Whether Biggs has good info? Pretty likely. He's usually solid when he reports.

 

The info that they plan to play Golladay with Robinson came out yesterday. At the point it came out yesterday, Robinson had yet to sign the tag. The info could have been put out there so Robinson wouldn't rush to sign the tag (thinking he was part of a tandem instead of being replaced), and they could hedge their bets and rescind it if they got Golladay.

 

Maybe I shouldn't have said "doesn't mean he's right" and should have said, "doesn't mean that's in stone". It honestly doesn't make much sense as both are X WRs, and Mooney is the (potential) long-term answer at Z. One of the 3 would move to the slot full-time, which probably isn't ideal for any of them.

Posted
The idea that Pace is playing chess with the top of the market at wr is bonkers to me raw

All other GMs are playing chess. Pace is playing Connect 4.

Posted
The idea that Pace is playing chess with the top of the market at wr is bonkers to me raw

All other GMs are playing chess. Pace is playing Connect 4.

If both wr's restructure to play together and someone comes along who can actually pass, fun!

 

If we end up with two $12 mil (+) Wrs and horsefeathering Andy Dalton overthrowing them, can we demand McCaskey gives up ownership

Community Moderator
Posted
Not a fan of keeping Hicks over Fuller. Hicks is 2 1/2 years older, and a 330 pounder, who has missed 9 games the last 2 years.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Not a fan of keeping Hicks over Fuller. Hicks is 2 1/2 years older, and a 330 pounder, who has missed 9 games the last 2 years.

When he’s out the D looks so much worse though. Not sure I can say that about Fuller.

Posted
Not a fan of keeping Hicks over Fuller. Hicks is 2 1/2 years older, and a 330 pounder, who has missed 9 games the last 2 years.

When he’s out the D looks so much worse though. Not sure I can say that about Fuller.

You can't say it about Fuller since he's been healthy since the one season he missed.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

 

Pretty ridiculous Pace played this so he couldn’t even get a Day 3 draft pick for a Pro Bowl CB.

 

Ridiculous is what Pace does.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...