Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Looks like the Jake Long market never materialized the way he thought. He's back in negotiations with Miami.

 

I'd bet it has less to do with market than it does ability to adequately pass a physical.

 

Highly unlikely.

  • Replies 874
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

In perhaps the biggest moves of the offseason for any team, the Titans cut Matt Hasselbeck and Jordan Babineaux today and signed Ryan Fitzpatrick.

 

I really like these moves. Fitzpatrick is younger and better than Hasselbeck, but is still a really smart guy (and QB, I believe) with experience who can help tutor Locker. Babineaux isn't very good, is already redundant with the addition of George Wilson and will become moreso if the Titans (please) sign Bernard Pollard.

Community Moderator
Posted

New Jags logo and new Dolphins logo leaked.

 

Jags:

 

http://i.imgur.com/3Cd0NQX.jpg

 

 

Dolphins:

 

http://i.imgur.com/Jya1oVE.jpg

 

Community Moderator
Posted

Tuck rule change passed overwhelmingly.

 

As did the RB crown of the helmet rule. Dumb.

 

 

EDIT: Crown of the helmet rule change vote was 31-1.

Posted
Tuck rule change passed overwhelmingly.

 

As did the RB crown of the helmet rule. Dumb.

 

I know there's a lot of alarmism going on and I know concussions are a significant issue, but this is getting ridiculous. How in the world is this enforceable without really dragging down the games?

Posted
Tuck rule change passed overwhelmingly.

 

As did the RB crown of the helmet rule. Dumb.

 

I know there's a lot of alarmism going on and I know concussions are a significant issue, but this is getting ridiculous. How in the world is this enforceable without really dragging down the games?

 

It depends on how far it gets out of hand. The NFL reviewed a week of games and found 5 times that it was worthy of penalty. It is only for plays outside the tackle box and only on obvious situations (so it's not as strong as the QB rule where even inadvertent contact is called). If it's only happening in 1 out of 3 games even before the RB's start adjusting for it, it shouldn't be getting called all that often.

Community Moderator
Posted
Tuck rule change passed overwhelmingly.

 

As did the RB crown of the helmet rule. Dumb.

 

I know there's a lot of alarmism going on and I know concussions are a significant issue, but this is getting ridiculous. How in the world is this enforceable without really dragging down the games?

 

It depends on how far it gets out of hand. The NFL reviewed a week of games and found 5 times that it was worthy of penalty. It is only for plays outside the tackle box and only on obvious situations (so it's not as strong as the QB rule where even inadvertent contact is called). If it's only happening in 1 out of 3 games even before the RB's start adjusting for it, it shouldn't be getting called all that often.

 

If it's only happening that often, why the need for the rule change?

Posted
Tuck rule change passed overwhelmingly.

 

As did the RB crown of the helmet rule. Dumb.

 

I know there's a lot of alarmism going on and I know concussions are a significant issue, but this is getting ridiculous. How in the world is this enforceable without really dragging down the games?

 

I do not get all the "dragging down the game" alarmism when it comes to these rules. Steelers fans have been apoplectic because they are stacked with dirty players who make dirty plays and now get called on it. These rules are essentially enforcing the way every youth coach should have been teaching his players how to play the game safely. You can still hit the crap out of guys in this sport and still have fantastic contests without the stuff they are now cracking down on.

Posted
Tuck rule change passed overwhelmingly.

 

As did the RB crown of the helmet rule. Dumb.

 

I know there's a lot of alarmism going on and I know concussions are a significant issue, but this is getting ridiculous. How in the world is this enforceable without really dragging down the games?

 

It depends on how far it gets out of hand. The NFL reviewed a week of games and found 5 times that it was worthy of penalty. It is only for plays outside the tackle box and only on obvious situations (so it's not as strong as the QB rule where even inadvertent contact is called). If it's only happening in 1 out of 3 games even before the RB's start adjusting for it, it shouldn't be getting called all that often.

 

If it's only happening that often, why the need for the rule change?

 

Well, that's still 80 times a season. If they can get that down to 20-30 by calling it a penalty, I'm sure the NFL will think that's a success, even if 5-6 times it's called wrong over the course of the year.

Posted
It depends on how far it gets out of hand. The NFL reviewed a week of games and found 5 times that it was worthy of penalty. It is only for plays outside the tackle box and only on obvious situations (so it's not as strong as the QB rule where even inadvertent contact is called). If it's only happening in 1 out of 3 games even before the RB's start adjusting for it, it shouldn't be getting called all that often.

 

I didn't know that it wasn't applicable inside the tackle box, that makes it much more palatable. I kind of wonder, though, if it's really as rare as they make it sound, what's the point of the penalty? If it happens that little then it's basically just a chance for refs to screw up with minimal benefit.

 

Pointless at best, in other words.

Posted
Tuck rule change passed overwhelmingly.

 

As did the RB crown of the helmet rule. Dumb.

 

I know there's a lot of alarmism going on and I know concussions are a significant issue, but this is getting ridiculous. How in the world is this enforceable without really dragging down the games?

 

I do not get all the "dragging down the game" alarmism when it comes to these rules. Steelers fans have been apoplectic because they are stacked with dirty players who make dirty plays and now get called on it. These rules are essentially enforcing the way every youth coach should have been teaching his players how to play the game safely. You can still hit the crap out of guys in this sport and still have fantastic contests without the stuff they are now cracking down on.

 

I've never complained about banning dirty stuff from the game. However, there's nothing dirty about getting your shoulder pads out front before you get tackled. When that happens, you're opening yourself up to either leaning slightly too much and getting a legit penalty or the ref making a bad call and screwing a team. If you don't do that, then you open yourself up to getting clotheslined or speared and potentially seriously injured.

Posted
However, there's nothing dirty about getting your shoulder pads out front before you get tackled. When that happens, you're opening yourself up to either leaning slightly too much and getting a legit penalty or the ref making a bad call and screwing a team. If you don't do that, then you open yourself up to getting clotheslined or speared and potentially seriously injured.

 

There is something dirty and dangerous about leading with the crown of your helmet. If you get clotheslined or speared the other team will be penalized.

Posted
However, there's nothing dirty about getting your shoulder pads out front before you get tackled. When that happens, you're opening yourself up to either leaning slightly too much and getting a legit penalty or the ref making a bad call and screwing a team. If you don't do that, then you open yourself up to getting clotheslined or speared and potentially seriously injured.

 

There is something dirty and dangerous about leading with the crown of your helmet. If you get clotheslined or speared the other team will be penalized.

 

There's no rule about spearing unless you lead with your helmet, is there? Also, if it's dirty to drop your pads when contact is about to be made, then pretty much every ballcarrier in NFL history has been dirty pretty consistently.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Walter Payton was apparently a really dirty player.
Posted
However, there's nothing dirty about getting your shoulder pads out front before you get tackled. When that happens, you're opening yourself up to either leaning slightly too much and getting a legit penalty or the ref making a bad call and screwing a team. If you don't do that, then you open yourself up to getting clotheslined or speared and potentially seriously injured.

 

There is something dirty and dangerous about leading with the crown of your helmet. If you get clotheslined or speared the other team will be penalized.

 

There's no rule about spearing unless you lead with your helmet, is there? Also, if it's dirty to drop your pads when contact is about to be made, then pretty much every ballcarrier in NFL history has been dirty pretty consistently.

 

You are pointlessly talking about dropping your pads when this is not at all what is being described.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...