Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Good trade for us. I liked it when the 'Wood for Marshall' rumors were spreading. I'm optimistic about Torreyes' future and eventually being a solid option for the top of the order. Sad to see Marshall go - he's a good person and player so hopefully Dusty doesn't ruin him.
  • Replies 680
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Good trade for us. I liked it when the 'Wood for Marshall' rumors were spreading. I'm optimistic about Torreyes' future and eventually being a solid option for the top of the order. Sad to see Marshall go - he's a good person and player so hopefully Dusty doesn't ruin him.

 

Dusty won't ruin him, he'll just use him as a LOOGY.

Posted
Good trade for us. I liked it when the 'Wood for Marshall' rumors were spreading. I'm optimistic about Torreyes' future and eventually being a solid option for the top of the order. Sad to see Marshall go - he's a good person and player so hopefully Dusty doesn't ruin him.

 

Dusty won't ruin him, he'll just use him as a LOOGY.

Maybe dusty wont ruin him, just his value. Then we'll sign him back next offseason to a team friendly contract haha

Posted
I think Theo has channeled his inner Ricky Bobby. "If you ain't first, you're last." By the way, Levine kind of floated a package from Toronto for Garza, although he certainly has no clue as to who the centerpiece would be. He mentioned Deck McGuire as the centerpiece, Jake Marisnick, and Justin Nicolino. Personally, I like it a lot. But, if the Yanks offered Montero and one of Banuelos or Betances, I'm not sure which I'd take. Montero is certainly the best prospect, but I think Nicolino is right there potential-wise with either of the Yankee pitchers, just further away. It'd come down to whether Marisnick and McGuire is worth more than Montero. I guess I doubt it is, but it's close for me at least. Replace McGuire with Syndergaard or Hutchison and I'd take the Jays deal.

 

With the Yankees, I'd want Montero and one of Banuelos or Betances and they wouldn't do that for Danks who's younger, a lefty, and I hate to say it but overall better so they won't do it for Garza. I know that Garza has an extra year under team control but I'm sure that the Yankees would have no trouble extending either one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...