Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Well, he's earned the final T so now I'll say it right.

 

Carlos Pena is a total butt.

 

Still waiting on the bust part.

 

I'm confused about what point you're making.

I think he's making fun of his earlier post:
This signing is starting to look like a total but.
  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Well, he's earned the final T so now I'll say it right.

 

Carlos Pena is a total butt.

 

Still waiting on the bust part.

 

I'm confused about what point you're making.

I think he's making fun of his earlier post:
This signing is starting to look like a total but.

 

You're probably right. I was just trying to figure out if he was still calling the signing bad or just joking about his original typo.

Posted
Well, he's earned the final T so now I'll say it right.

 

Carlos Pena is a total butt.

 

Still waiting on the bust part.

 

I'm confused about what point you're making.

I think he's making fun of his earlier post:
This signing is starting to look like a total but.

 

You're probably right. I was just trying to figure out if he was still calling the signing bad or just joking about his original typo.

Could be a bit of both.
  • 1 month later...
Posted
i know you're not allowed to do this. but pretend april never happened, pena's line is .251/.366/.567

 

sexy

 

 

with the way he was seeing pitches, working deep into counts, and slowly starting to hit it was only a matter of time. any predictions for his final line for the year?

Posted

It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

 

I'd rather sign Pena to a reasonable 2-3 year deal than pay a fortune to lure Pujols to play in Chicago until his 42nd birthday.

 

On a side note, whenever Pena steps up to the plate lately, I get the same feeling that I did during Jim Edmonds' at bats in the summer of '08.

Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

I'd gladly take that line over the next 3 years. I doubt Pujols/Fielder will be worth 12-15 million more than that.

Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

I'd gladly take that line over the next 3 years. I doubt Pujols/Fielder will be worth 12-15 million more than that.

 

3/30 for Pena vs. 5/100 for Fielder. Discuss.

Guest
Guests
Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

I'd gladly take that line over the next 3 years. I doubt Pujols/Fielder will be worth 12-15 million more than that.

 

Pena has had an OBP that high twice in his career, and a SLG that high once.

Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

I'd gladly take that line over the next 3 years. I doubt Pujols/Fielder will be worth 12-15 million more than that.

 

3/30 for Pena vs. 5/100 for Fielder. Discuss.

Both contracts seem too low. 6/150 for Fielder and 4/50 for Pena seem more realistic.

 

In any event, Fielder is exactly twice the annual price of Pena. I'd probably take Fielder. He's younger, more productive, and a more legitimate impact bat. And I'm not a huge Fielder fan... I'm concerned he'll turn into Mo Vaughn II.

Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

I'd gladly take that line over the next 3 years. I doubt Pujols/Fielder will be worth 12-15 million more than that.

 

3/30 for Pena vs. 5/100 for Fielder. Discuss.

Both contracts seem too low. 6/150 for Fielder and 4/50 for Pena seem more realistic.

 

In any event, Fielder is exactly twice the annual price of Pena. I'd probably take Fielder. He's younger, more productive, and a more legitimate impact bat. And I'm not a huge Fielder fan... I'm concerned he'll turn into Mo Vaughn II.

 

Pena is 33 years old and he's pretty unstable, production wise. I don't see him getting four years guaranteed unless the AAV is low enough to soften the hit if he goes in the tank.

Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

I'd gladly take that line over the next 3 years. I doubt Pujols/Fielder will be worth 12-15 million more than that.

 

Pena has had an OBP that high twice in his career, and a SLG that high once.

 

He's also played his entire career in pitcher friendly parks. I don't think he could sustain his current pace over the next few years, but maybe for the rest of this one. The NL Central is fairly hitter friendly.

 

Though after that April that SLG might be a bit unrealistic. Maybe .520.

Posted
It's really too bad Carlos isn't 4-5 years younger. I really like his approach and his attitude. His defense is none too shabby, either.

 

I predict a final line in the .240/.370/.550 range, but I pray that doesn't motivate the powers that be to try and retain him. As much as I like the guy, you have to try and deal him.

I'd gladly take that line over the next 3 years. I doubt Pujols/Fielder will be worth 12-15 million more than that.

 

3/30 for Pena vs. 5/100 for Fielder. Discuss.

Both contracts seem too low. 6/150 for Fielder and 4/50 for Pena seem more realistic.

 

In any event, Fielder is exactly twice the annual price of Pena. I'd probably take Fielder. He's younger, more productive, and a more legitimate impact bat. And I'm not a huge Fielder fan... I'm concerned he'll turn into Mo Vaughn II.

 

That's not really a bad thing though. Vaughn played til he was 35 and only sucked in his very last year. I don't know (well... can't remember) why he missed the whole season in 2001. Vaughn was really good until he was 30 then the next 3 years he declined, but he was still good enough (119/115/113 OPS+) in those years. Then he suck his last year and retired. Fielder is a more complete hitter and probably more athletic (not that it's saying something though) than Vaughn. Fielder has a better BB% rate and K% (this year he cutting it down A LOT) and has more power.

 

As long as you can sign Fielder to a 5-6 year deal, I think you're going to be fine. If it's more than 6 years though, that's where it gets tricky. I would be ok with more than 6 years if the extra years were like club/mutual options and/or he has an opt out clause before his last year or something along that line. I hope Boras will want a shorter contract so Fielder will be able to get another big contract when he's like 32 or 33. Another thing will be... how much per year is it going to take to land Fielder??? I wish Ryan Howard didn't get that STUPID 5/125 extension because I imagine that's the contract Boras is looking at for Fielder (which is too much IMO, but if I had to pick Howard or Fielder at that price... it would be Fielder easily).

Posted (edited)
Yeah, that Howard deal really sort of [expletive] the bed for everyone. What an awful, awful contract.

 

I couldn't believe the terms when I heard them. The guy isn't even top 5 at his position.

 

Fangraphs doesn't have him top 20.

 

ETA: Quick glance shows those #s are skewed due to non-1B being lumped in because they played a few games there.

Edited by SouthSideRyan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...