Jump to content
North Side Baseball

What could we get for Marmol?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Weren't there whispers of a Marmol to the Reds deal earlier in the year? I believe we were clamoring for Yonder Alonso in return. Not sure if folks were being unreasonable or not, but considering just how good Marmol can be, and especially considering the Nats got Wilson Ramos in return for Matt Capps, I'd say we should be able to get a very good prospect in the Yonder Alonso mold for Marmol. Lest we not forget Marmol will be under team control for the next 2 years in arbitration, so that could be another key enticer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not totally advocating it, I just dont trust his control and I think he would bring back something more valuable

 

His control is not good. But if you are going to walk 6.3 hitters per 9 innings, then you better: be unhittable, keep the ball in the park, and keep the ball from getting put in play. Carlos Marmol is the best in baseball at all 3 of those things, thus rendering his control problems, not much of a problem.

 

That being said, I would trade Marmol in a heartbeat if it meant getting star level talent back in return. But there is really no precedent for a reliever this dominant to get traded, much less traded for a package of players that would make trading Marmol worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't there whispers of a Marmol to the Reds deal earlier in the year? I believe we were clamoring for Yonder Alonso in return. Not sure if folks were being unreasonable or not, but considering just how good Marmol can be, and especially considering the Nats got Wilson Ramos in return for Matt Capps, I'd say we should be able to get a very good prospect in the Yonder Alonso mold for Marmol. Lest we not forget Marmol will be under team control for the next 2 years in arbitration, so that could be another key enticer

 

The rumored trade was Marmol to Cincy for Chris Heisey (I think it was). A lot of people on here were wishing for Alonso.

 

However, that was a very unreliable website, so I don't know that any credence should be given to that rumor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more than willing to trade Marmol for the right return. But I don't think we'd be able to get the kind of player that makes it worthwhile (top 25 prospect in all of baseball).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more than willing to trade Marmol for the right return. But I don't think we'd be able to get the kind of player that makes it worthwhile (top 25 prospect in all of baseball).

 

Unfortunately, that seems to be the problem with too many of the Cubs. Marmol, Byrd, Fukudome (for salary reasons) and Zambrano (for salary reasons) probably won't get you equal value in prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more than willing to trade Marmol for the right return. But I don't think we'd be able to get the kind of player that makes it worthwhile (top 25 prospect in all of baseball).

 

Do you think the Capps for Ramos deal was a matter of desperation on the Twins' part or do you think they genuinely perceived Capps as a valuable swap for Ramos? I know Ramos was highly expendable, but would you agree that because of that deal it changes the landscape for the trade value of high performance closers like Marmol? Top 25 maybe not, but top 50 perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more than willing to trade Marmol for the right return. But I don't think we'd be able to get the kind of player that makes it worthwhile (top 25 prospect in all of baseball).

 

Do you think the Capps for Ramos deal was a matter of desperation on the Twins' part or do you think they genuinely perceived Capps as a valuable swap for Ramos? I know Ramos was highly expendable, but would you agree that because of that deal it changes the landscape for the trade value of high performance closers like Marmol? Top 25 maybe not, but top 50 perhaps?

I think it's an easier trade for the receiving team to make during the season. A closer is usually viewed as a "last piece" kind of a guy. So I think it's easier for a team to see themselves as being a single dominant relief pitcher away from the playoffs / world series during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more than willing to trade Marmol for the right return. But I don't think we'd be able to get the kind of player that makes it worthwhile (top 25 prospect in all of baseball).

 

Unfortunately, that seems to be the problem with too many of the Cubs. Marmol, Byrd, Fukudome (for salary reasons) and Zambrano (for salary reasons) probably won't get you equal value in prospects.

I still don't know why people want to trade Fukudome. Trade Colvin to a small market team instead. The best trade proposal I've heard all season is Colvin for Gordon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more than willing to trade Marmol for the right return. But I don't think we'd be able to get the kind of player that makes it worthwhile (top 25 prospect in all of baseball).

 

Unfortunately, that seems to be the problem with too many of the Cubs. Marmol, Byrd, Fukudome (for salary reasons) and Zambrano (for salary reasons) probably won't get you equal value in prospects.

I still don't know why people want to trade Fukudome. Trade Colvin to a small market team instead. The best trade proposal I've heard all season is Colvin for Gordon.

 

I'm guessing we wouldn't have to give up Colvin to get Gordon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do people realize yet that alex gordon might just not be that good? he hasn't had a lot of success at the major league level in 3 years, he's got injury problems and now he's not playing 3B, which makes his bat less valuable. plus he's 26 years old. i know he hit the [expletive] out of the ball in college and the minors, but don't there have to be major questions about whether it's going to come together for him at the big league level?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

do people realize yet that alex gordon might just not be that good? he hasn't had a lot of success at the major league level in 3 years, he's got injury problems and now he's not playing 3B, which makes his bat less valuable. plus he's 26 years old. i know he hit the [expletive] out of the ball in college and the minors, but don't there have to be major questions about whether it's going to come together for him at the big league level?

I feel more confident about his track record and probable future production than Colvin's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do people realize yet that alex gordon might just not be that good? he hasn't had a lot of success at the major league level in 3 years, he's got injury problems and now he's not playing 3B, which makes his bat less valuable. plus he's 26 years old. i know he hit the [expletive] out of the ball in college and the minors, but don't there have to be major questions about whether it's going to come together for him at the big league level?

Well, his first year he wasn't all that great, but I thought in his second year he had an amazing second half which ended up with him having some pretty good numbers. Since then he's been hurt, so I understand why people would be all for adding him. Especially when you take into consideration that the Royals would probably move him for Darwin Bailey at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do people realize yet that alex gordon might just not be that good? he hasn't had a lot of success at the major league level in 3 years, he's got injury problems and now he's not playing 3B, which makes his bat less valuable. plus he's 26 years old. i know he hit the [expletive] out of the ball in college and the minors, but don't there have to be major questions about whether it's going to come together for him at the big league level?

Well, his first year he wasn't all that great, but I thought in his second year he had an amazing second half which ended up with him having some pretty good numbers. Since then he's been hurt, so I understand why people would be all for adding him. Especially when you take into consideration that the Royals would probably move him for Darwin Bailey at this point.

 

At least we'd get to keep Darwin Barney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do people realize yet that alex gordon might just not be that good? he hasn't had a lot of success at the major league level in 3 years, he's got injury problems and now he's not playing 3B, which makes his bat less valuable. plus he's 26 years old. i know he hit the [expletive] out of the ball in college and the minors, but don't there have to be major questions about whether it's going to come together for him at the big league level?

Well, his first year he wasn't all that great, but I thought in his second year he had an amazing second half which ended up with him having some pretty good numbers. Since then he's been hurt, so I understand why people would be all for adding him. Especially when you take into consideration that the Royals would probably move him for Darwin Bailey at this point.

 

At least we'd get to keep Darwin Barney.

Damn that who I meant. Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't there whispers of a Marmol to the Reds deal earlier in the year? I believe we were clamoring for Yonder Alonso in return. Not sure if folks were being unreasonable or not, but considering just how good Marmol can be, and especially considering the Nats got Wilson Ramos in return for Matt Capps, I'd say we should be able to get a very good prospect in the Yonder Alonso mold for Marmol. Lest we not forget Marmol will be under team control for the next 2 years in arbitration, so that could be another key enticer

 

 

How bout this:

 

Reds get Marmol and Fukudome

 

Cubs get Alonso and Cordero

 

It's a win/win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't there whispers of a Marmol to the Reds deal earlier in the year? I believe we were clamoring for Yonder Alonso in return. Not sure if folks were being unreasonable or not, but considering just how good Marmol can be, and especially considering the Nats got Wilson Ramos in return for Matt Capps, I'd say we should be able to get a very good prospect in the Yonder Alonso mold for Marmol. Lest we not forget Marmol will be under team control for the next 2 years in arbitration, so that could be another key enticer

 

 

How bout this:

 

Reds get Marmol and Fukudome

 

Cubs get Alonso and Cordero

 

It's a win/win

I wouldn't even sort of consider that deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How bout this:

 

Reds get Marmol and Fukudome

 

Cubs get Alonso and Cordero

 

It's a win/win

 

Cordero is 35 and hasn't been good at all this year – 4.08 ERA, 1.50 WHIP, 53:36 K:BB, 4.67 xFIP.

 

The Marmol/Alonso part kind of interests me (Alonso would have to be the base of any deal I made with the Reds involving Marmol), but Fukudome is way, way more valuable than Cordero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How bout this:

 

Reds get Marmol and Fukudome

 

Cubs get Alonso and Cordero

 

It's a win/win

 

Cordero is 35 and hasn't been good at all this year – 4.08 ERA, 1.50 WHIP, 53:36 K:BB, 4.67 xFIP.

 

The Marmol/Alonso part kind of interests me (Alonso would have to be the base of any deal I made with the Reds involving Marmol), but Fukudome is way, way more valuable than Cordero.

 

Yeah, but Alonso is more valuable than Marmol and Cordero/Fukudome evens out the money. I bet Reds fans would think this is a bad deal for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but Alonso is more valuable than Marmol and Cordero/Fukudome evens out the money. I bet Reds fans would think this is a bad deal for them.

 

How is a player with minimal major league experience (much less ML success) more valuable than one of the most elite young closers in the game? I agree that Alonso's ceiling is far better than Marmol's, but Marmol is much more valuable right now.

 

And even though Fuku/Cordero even out the money, you're trading a valuable asset (Kosuke) for a non-valuable asset (Cordero) with both being overpaid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...