Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 515
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
thats grounding

 

ball was 5 yards short of the line of scrimmage... refs are really missing a good game this drive.

also still in the tackle box

 

and no receiver within 10 yards. otherwise it was a perfect no-call.

Posted

Gotta agree, some brutal non-calls on this drive.

 

Dunno about the PI, thought it was a good call.

 

QUIT CIRCLING THE TIME OUTS!

Posted
Come on, don't let USC back into a national championship game.
Posted
It was blatant PI.

 

defensive player was making a play for ball, so no interference...know the rules

 

I know the rules.

 

In fact, I'd say anyone who doesn't think that was anything but blatant PI has a dubious grasp at best of the rules. It was obvious.

Posted
It was blatant PI.

 

defensive player was making a play for ball, so no interference...know the rules

 

I know the rules.

 

In fact, I'd say anyone who doesn't think that was anything but blatant PI has a dubious grasp at best of the rules. It was obvious.

 

if an offensive player goes over the top of a defensive player in that situation, trying to make the catch, do they call it offensive PI?
Posted
It was blatant PI.

 

defensive player was making a play for ball, so no interference...know the rules

 

I know the rules.

 

In fact, I'd say anyone who doesn't think that was anything but blatant PI has a dubious grasp at best of the rules. It was obvious.

So if that was an offensive player making that play, would it have been offensive interference...NO...because both players have the right to the ball, the PSU player was making a play for the ball, not interfering. I understand the rule

Posted

No, you don't understand the rules. If you did, you would know that was blatant PI.

 

I'm not trying to sound like an ahole but it was in no way questionable. It's not even a matter of interpretation or opinion. It was clear.

Posted

instead of the end of the iowa penn st game, abc is showing ou's 66-21 THIRD QUARTER blow out of a&m

 

i mean, just give me the final 10 seconds at least

Posted
Thankfully we won't see a Big 10 team in the title game this year. Thanks Iowa.
Posted
No, you don't understand the rules. If you did, you would know that was blatant PI.

 

I'm not trying to sound like an ahole but it was in no way questionable. It's not even a matter of interpretation or opinion. It was clear.

 

than make an argument, besides "it was blatant PI." What is your understanding of the rule? I made an argument.

Posted
Thankfully we won't see a Big 10 team in the title game this year. Thanks Iowa.

 

Odd, if I rooted for a Big Ten team, I'd want two BCS teams in my conference for the financial impact to the school I root for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...