Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
No matter what the context, two runs should not beat this Cubs team. As long as Marquis can keep getting those at-em balls, the Cubs should be able to win the game.

 

If we were against Snell or Maholm, Id say we can easliy scratch out 3-4 runs if Marquis can hold them down, but when were facing a no name pitcher in his first start, at least in the NL, the Cubs are often baffled.

 

Snell, yes. Maholm, no. With one or two exceptions, he's been lights out since the start of June.

  • Replies 523
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
No matter what the context, two runs should not beat this Cubs team. As long as Marquis can keep getting those at-em balls, the Cubs should be able to win the game.

 

If we were against Snell or Maholm, Id say we can easliy scratch out 3-4 runs if Marquis can hold them down, but when were facing a no name pitcher in his first start, at least in the NL, the Cubs are often baffled.

 

Snell, yes. Maholm, no. With one or two exceptions, he's been lights out since the start of June.

Yeah, we have the best offense in the NL. I think we could get four runs off of Paul Maholm.

Posted
Marquis can maybe give up one more over the next 2-3 innings. I can't see Carstens and their pen giving up less than four.
Posted

I'm beginning to wonder if this is some kind of board-wide joke on me.

 

"Hey, guys, let's take some average starting pitcher and rip him mercilessly as if he were Rueben Quevedo or Shawn Estes. It'll totally confuse KyleJRM"

Posted
I'm beginning to wonder if this is some kind of board-wide joke on me.

 

"Hey, guys, let's take some average starting pitcher and rip him mercilessly as if he were Rueben Quevedo or Shawn Estes. It'll totally confuse KyleJRM"

 

Aww crap. He figured us out.

 

Joke's over, guys.

Posted
Anyone else get angry when they hear someone refer to Marquis as a "good hitting pitcher"? He's hitting .158 this year and hit .139 last year. He's just as bad as Lilly and Dempster (but at least they can pitch).
Posted
Anyone else get angry when they hear someone refer to Marquis as a "good hitting pitcher"? He's hitting .158 this year and hit .139 last year. He's just as bad as Lilly and Dempster (but at least they can pitch).

He had one good hitting year, and suprise suprise, it was for the Cardinals.

Posted
Anyone else get angry when they hear someone refer to Marquis as a "good hitting pitcher"? He's hitting .158 this year and hit .139 last year. He's just as bad as Lilly and Dempster (but at least they can pitch).

 

Marquis just makes me angry in general.

Posted
I'm beginning to wonder if this is some kind of board-wide joke on me.

 

"Hey, guys, let's take some average starting pitcher and rip him mercilessly as if he were Rueben Quevedo or Shawn Estes. It'll totally confuse KyleJRM"

 

Yeah everybody, quit being so mean to the big money pitcher who absolutely sucked in the second half last year and is well on his way to repeating that feat this year. I mean, it makes no sense why Cubs fans with dreams of glory would be upset with a pitcher putting up a 7 ERA so far since the ASB with an OPS against over 900.

 

Smart fans would applaud this effort.

Posted
I'm beginning to wonder if this is some kind of board-wide joke on me.

 

"Hey, guys, let's take some average starting pitcher and rip him mercilessly as if he were Rueben Quevedo or Shawn Estes. It'll totally confuse KyleJRM"

 

Yeah everybody, quit being so mean to the big money pitcher who absolutely sucked in the second half last year and is well on his way to repeating that feat this year. I mean, it makes no sense why Cubs fans with dreams of glory would be upset with a pitcher putting up a 7 ERA so far since the ASB with an OPS against over 900.

 

Smart fans would applaud this effort.

 

Smart fans wouldn't arbitrarily pick out the portions of the season which prove their point, they'd look at the bigger picture.

Posted
Marquis has a league-average ERA with a below-league-average WHIP. Which indicates, if anything, he's fortunate to have given up as few runs as he has to this point.
Posted
Marquis has a league-average ERA with a below-league-average WHIP. Which indicates, if anything, he's fortunate to have given up as few runs as he has to this point.

 

As has been the case so far today. But at this point, I'll take it.

Posted
Marquis has a league-average ERA with a below-league-average WHIP. Which indicates, if anything, he's fortunate to have given up as few runs as he has to this point.

 

WHIP is a bad stat.

 

So is ERA.

Posted
Marquis has a league-average ERA with a below-league-average WHIP. Which indicates, if anything, he's fortunate to have given up as few runs as he has to this point.

 

WHIP is a bad stat.

 

So is ERA.

 

Agreed. How about FIP?

Posted
Marquis has a league-average ERA with a below-league-average WHIP. Which indicates, if anything, he's fortunate to have given up as few runs as he has to this point.

 

WHIP is a bad stat.

 

I'm far from a stathead, but it seems an incredibly good stat. Higher WHIP = higher pitch counts, more pressure on defense, and usually more runs.

 

Please explain...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...