Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted
It's worth pointing out that his release point, while on average higher, remains pretty inconsistent. Significantly more so than what it was earlier this season.
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted

It was back down again tonight:

 

http://brooksbaseball.net/pfx/release.php?xml=http://gd2.mlb.com/components/game/mlb/year_2008/month_07/day_29/gid_2008_07_29_chnmlb_milmlb_1//pbp/pitchers/407296.xml&innings=yyyyyyyyy&sp_type=1&s_type=1

Posted
118 pitches? i didn't see the game so maybe i'm missing something, but why send him out for the 8th? particularly after the high count last game (125?).
Posted
118 pitches? i didn't see the game so maybe i'm missing something, but why send him out for the 8th? particularly after the high count last game (125?).

 

That was predictable following the amount of bullpen usage they've had.

Posted
118 pitches? i didn't see the game so maybe i'm missing something, but why send him out for the 8th? particularly after the high count last game (125?).

 

He went back out in the 8th cause he didn't have a single high-stress inning and was sailing along with little effort.

Posted
118 pitches? i didn't see the game so maybe i'm missing something, but why send him out for the 8th? particularly after the high count last game (125?).

 

He went back out in the 8th cause he didn't have a single high-stress inning and was sailing along with little effort.

ok. 118 wouldn't concern me if he hadn't already had problems this year. factor in that he had 125 last time and i thought it was concerning, though like i said, i didn't actually see the game.

 

as goony pointed out, it could be expected with the bullpen use lately, but i would think Eyre could have been used.

Posted
118 pitches? i didn't see the game so maybe i'm missing something, but why send him out for the 8th? particularly after the high count last game (125?).

 

That was predictable following the amount of bullpen MISusage they've had.

 

Corrected

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Average fastball: 89.95 mph (down 2.64 mph from last time out)

Top fastball: 92.8 mph (down 3.0 mph from last time out)

 

Release point wasn't that low, though the pattern looks a little different:

 

http://brooksbaseball.net/pfx/release.php?xml=http://gd2.mlb.com/components/game/mlb/year_2008/month_08/day_03/gid_2008_08_03_pitmlb_chnmlb_1//pbp/pitchers/407296.xml&batterX=0&innings=yyyyyyyyy&sp_type=1&s_type=1

 

But I'm sure Lou will have him throw 120+ pitches for no reason next time out.

Posted
Why did they keep him on such a low pitch count today?

 

 

I think Brenly mentioned he was going short on account of his 2 previous games with high pitch counts. In any even he made sure to let the TV audience know that Z was fine.

Posted
Give me the 95 rotation: Castillo, Navarro, Trachel, Foster, and Bullinger. Those were the days!

 

 

Hah, that was my first year watching the team. I actually liked that rotation for some reason. I was a fan of Kevin Foster and Castillo. Navarro was solid with us, too.

 

I don't remember much about Bullinger other than he had huge ears.

Posted
Give me the 95 rotation: Castillo, Navarro, Trachel, Foster, and Bullinger. Those were the days!

 

 

Hah, that was my first year watching the team. I actually liked that rotation for some reason. I was a fan of Kevin Foster and Castillo. Navarro was solid with us, too.

 

I don't remember much about Bullinger other than he had huge ears.

 

There was a time when Bullinger pitched well, but the thing I remember most about him was that he hit a homerun in his first at-bat against the Cardinals, I think he also pitched well that day to. This is going on my fuzzy bad memory though so I could be completely wrong.

Posted
Why did they keep him on such a low pitch count today?

125 and 118 pitches his 2 previous starts

 

Again, there was no reason for Lou to make Z throw in the 8th last week in Milwaukee. We had a 7 run lead and a rested bullpen. I couldnt believe after 125 pitches in his last start, he made Z go out for another inning in a blowout after throwing like 103 through 7 innings. We almost lost yesterday partially because of it.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Why did they keep him on such a low pitch count today?

125 and 118 pitches his 2 previous starts

 

Again, there was no reason for Lou to make Z throw in the 8th last week in Milwaukee. We had a 7 run lead and a rested bullpen. I couldnt believe after 125 pitches in his last start, he made Z go out for another inning in a blowout after throwing like 103 through 7 innings. We almost lost yesterday partially because of it.

 

I assume Gaudin would still have been in there for the 8th inning regardless, because Z's pitch count was getting pretty high early. So I don't think it had much to do with us giving up the lead.

 

By way of comparison, there's no doubt Dusty would just let Z pitch 120+ every time out for the rest of the season. So at least Lou keeps in mind the wear & tear and tries to take action to limit the damage. That's more than I can say for some other managers in this league.

Posted
Why did they keep him on such a low pitch count today?

125 and 118 pitches his 2 previous starts

 

Again, there was no reason for Lou to make Z throw in the 8th last week in Milwaukee. We had a 7 run lead and a rested bullpen. I couldnt believe after 125 pitches in his last start, he made Z go out for another inning in a blowout after throwing like 103 through 7 innings. We almost lost yesterday partially because of it.

 

We did not have a rested bullpen when Z went 8 last week.

 

And we didn't almost lose because of it today. Z being able to go another inning still means that Cotts/Gaudin pitch the 8th.

Posted
Why did they keep him on such a low pitch count today?

125 and 118 pitches his 2 previous starts

 

Again, there was no reason for Lou to make Z throw in the 8th last week in Milwaukee. We had a 7 run lead and a rested bullpen. I couldnt believe after 125 pitches in his last start, he made Z go out for another inning in a blowout after throwing like 103 through 7 innings. We almost lost yesterday partially because of it.

 

We did not have a rested bullpen when Z went 8 last week.

 

And we didn't almost lose because of it today. Z being able to go another inning still means that Cotts/Gaudin pitch the 8th.

 

The counterargument to both your points is Jeff Samardzija. He could have gone 2 in Milwaukee, and if Z went through 6 yesterday, its possibly likely Jeff pitches in the 7th and 8th. Not a given but a possibility.

Posted
Why did they keep him on such a low pitch count today?

125 and 118 pitches his 2 previous starts

 

Again, there was no reason for Lou to make Z throw in the 8th last week in Milwaukee. We had a 7 run lead and a rested bullpen. I couldnt believe after 125 pitches in his last start, he made Z go out for another inning in a blowout after throwing like 103 through 7 innings. We almost lost yesterday partially because of it.

 

I assume Gaudin would still have been in there for the 8th inning regardless, because Z's pitch count was getting pretty high early. So I don't think it had much to do with us giving up the lead.

 

By way of comparison, there's no doubt Dusty would just let Z pitch 120+ every time out for the rest of the season. So at least Lou keeps in mind the wear & tear and tries to take action to limit the damage. That's more than I can say for some other managers in this league.

 

I agree, I'm not complaining that Lou's burning out our arms at all. It's night and day from Dusty's reign. He just goes about a weird way of using his pitchers.

Posted
there was no reason for Lou to make Z throw in the 8th last week in Milwaukee.

 

I think it is possible that, in order for Zambrano to be able to go 120 or so when it matters, he has to build up the stamina. That 118, after the 125, might be what enables him to almost always have it in him to go the distance. It's possible that building to 120+ in October or in a crucial Sep game requires a few back-to-back during the season.

Posted
Give me the 95 rotation: Castillo, Navarro, Trachel, Foster, and Bullinger. Those were the days!

 

 

Hah, that was my first year watching the team. I actually liked that rotation for some reason. I was a fan of Kevin Foster and Castillo. Navarro was solid with us, too.

 

I don't remember much about Bullinger other than he had huge ears.

 

Trachsel was dominant in 1996, if nothing else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...