Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The fact that you repeatedly said the name Eckstein really disgusts me.

 

 

He's approaching his mid 30's now, and was never that good to begin with.

 

Let Theriot play the role of Eckstein circa 2005 at a fraction of the cost, or go in a completely different direction. But don't pay millions for that type of production.

 

What's more disgusting? Paying $4M to Izturis or $4M to Eckstein?

I'm all for going with Theriot if he's ready.

Posted
The fact that you repeatedly said the name Eckstein really disgusts me.

 

 

He's approaching his mid 30's now, and was never that good to begin with.

 

Let Theriot play the role of Eckstein circa 2005 at a fraction of the cost, or go in a completely different direction. But don't pay millions for that type of production.

 

What's more disgusting? Paying $4M to Izturis or $4M to Eckstein?

I'm all for going with Theriot if he's ready.

Fontenot can't play SS, can he?

Posted
I'd prefer not to give up Veal. He has been turning it around of late in AA. The Cubs should focus on upgrading offensively in RF, and stick with Theriot for the time being at SS>
Posted
The fact that you repeatedly said the name Eckstein really disgusts me.

 

 

He's approaching his mid 30's now, and was never that good to begin with.

 

Let Theriot play the role of Eckstein circa 2005 at a fraction of the cost, or go in a completely different direction. But don't pay millions for that type of production.

 

What's more disgusting? Paying $4M to Izturis or $4M to Eckstein?

I'm all for going with Theriot if he's ready.

 

See, the problem is Eckstein's name should not be mentioned. There's no reason to even consider him a fallback. It's not whether or not he's better than Izturis.

Posted
The fact that you repeatedly said the name Eckstein really disgusts me.

 

 

He's approaching his mid 30's now, and was never that good to begin with.

 

Let Theriot play the role of Eckstein circa 2005 at a fraction of the cost, or go in a completely different direction. But don't pay millions for that type of production.

 

What's more disgusting? Paying $4M to Izturis or $4M to Eckstein?

I'm all for going with Theriot if he's ready.

 

See, the problem is Eckstein's name should not be mentioned. There's no reason to even consider him a fallback. It's not whether or not he's better than Izturis.

 

He's a potential free agent. And the Cubs may potentially have an opening at SS to fill for 2008. Why shouldn't his name be mentioned in a SS conversation? Why isn't he a potential fallback? He's got a career OBP of .350, which is better than Izturis and Theriot. He's 32 and he might be a good addition for 2 years with Soriano, Pie, Lee and Ramirez.

Posted
He's a potential free agent. And the Cubs may potentially have an opening at SS to fill for 2008. Why shouldn't his name be mentioned in a SS conversation?

 

Because he's overrated and not very good. It would be so very Cubs like to pay anything for the crap production a guy like Eckstein is likely to give as he enters his mid 30's. Aneheim and STL got the most out of him, he's gotten the most out of his talent. But the pumpkin is going to show up soon and the Cubs should not be the one holding onto his contract when it does.

 

If they can't get ARod, then fill SS internally with some $350,000 fill-ins and spend money on players that would actually improve the team.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
No Orlando Cabrera fans?

 

You know, I was thinking about that the other day. In 2004, it was a foregone conclusion we were going to get Orlando Cabrera. Instead, we got Nomar, which seemed much better.

 

We'd be golden at the SS position if we had just gotten Orlando like we were supposed to.

Posted
No Orlando Cabrera fans?

 

I doubt he's available. He's signed through next year and having a great season on a 1st place team.

 

But no, I'm not much of a fan. This year is clearly a fluke. He's 32 and putting up an OPS+ 45.3% above his career average of 86. He has a career .321 OBP, which is weak, but tolerable. Howeve, he's been at .306 and .309 in 2 of of the previous 3 seasons. He turns 33 this November. I'm guessing maybe the Angels would trade him in his walk year, but how much would you have to give up for the right to pay him $9m and hope he doesn't regress?

Posted
No Orlando Cabrera fans?

 

I doubt he's available. He's signed through next year and having a great season on a 1st place team.

 

But no, I'm not much of a fan. This year is clearly a fluke. He's 32 and putting up an OPS+ 45.3% above his career average of 86. He has a career .321 OBP, which is weak, but tolerable. Howeve, he's been at .306 and .309 in 2 of of the previous 3 seasons. He turns 33 this November. I'm guessing maybe the Angels would trade him in his walk year, but how much would you have to give up for the right to pay him $9m and hope he doesn't regress?

 

I'm not a fan either, to be honest. Just think he is an interesting name especially considering he has been a target in the past.

Posted
The fact that you repeatedly said the name Eckstein really disgusts me.

 

 

He's approaching his mid 30's now, and was never that good to begin with.

 

Let Theriot play the role of Eckstein circa 2005 at a fraction of the cost, or go in a completely different direction. But don't pay millions for that type of production.

 

What's more disgusting? Paying $4M to Izturis or $4M to Eckstein?

I'm all for going with Theriot if he's ready.

Fontenot can't play SS, can he?

 

He played it a fair amount at Iowa, but he wouldn't be a good-fielding shortstop. Then again, Brendan Harris isn't supposed to be able to play SS, and he's out there every game for the D-Rays.

Posted
No Orlando Cabrera fans?

 

I doubt he's available. He's signed through next year and having a great season on a 1st place team.

 

But no, I'm not much of a fan. This year is clearly a fluke. He's 32 and putting up an OPS+ 45.3% above his career average of 86. He has a career .321 OBP, which is weak, but tolerable. Howeve, he's been at .306 and .309 in 2 of of the previous 3 seasons. He turns 33 this November. I'm guessing maybe the Angels would trade him in his walk year, but how much would you have to give up for the right to pay him $9m and hope he doesn't regress?

 

I'm not a fan either, to be honest. Just think he is an interesting name especially considering he has been a target in the past.

 

He is an interesting name. If LAA wanted to trade him this year and took back Izturis + Jones, that would be nice. Cabrera certainly stands a better shot of not being a black hole. But once you make the trade, I fear they give him something like 4/40 which his numbers don't seem to justify.

Posted
The fact that you repeatedly said the name Eckstein really disgusts me.

 

 

He's approaching his mid 30's now, and was never that good to begin with.

 

Let Theriot play the role of Eckstein circa 2005 at a fraction of the cost, or go in a completely different direction. But don't pay millions for that type of production.

 

What's more disgusting? Paying $4M to Izturis or $4M to Eckstein?

I'm all for going with Theriot if he's ready.

Fontenot can't play SS, can he?

 

He played it a fair amount at Iowa, but he wouldn't be a good-fielding shortstop. Then again, Brendan Harris isn't supposed to be able to play SS, and he's out there every game for the D-Rays.

 

Brendan Harris could be on the market, with Reid Brignac on the way.

Posted
Brendan Harris could be on the market, with Reid Brignac on the way.

 

The question is, how much of Harris' performance this year is a fluke? His BABIP is .363, obviously unsustainable unless he keeps hitting line drives at a 28% rate. PECOTA certainly didn't forecast a season this good out of him. Fontenot's PECOTA has him averaging around a .345 OBP with a .750 OPS over the next five years. If you're going to go with a guy who's got pretty solid offense but a glove that works better at 3B/2B, why not just stick Fontenot there? He can probably do about the same as Harris, and you won't have to give up anything of value.

Posted
Brendan Harris could be on the market, with Reid Brignac on the way.

 

The question is, how much of Harris' performance this year is a fluke? His BABIP is .363, obviously unsustainable unless he keeps hitting line drives at a 28% rate. PECOTA certainly didn't forecast a season this good out of him. Fontenot's PECOTA has him averaging around a .345 OBP with a .750 OPS over the next five years. If you're going to go with a guy who's got pretty solid offense but a glove that works better at 3B/2B, why not just stick Fontenot there? He can probably do about the same as Harris, and you won't have to give up anything of value.

 

I'm still not convince Fonty can handle SS. Although, he does seem to have the range and the arm from what I've seen from him at 2B.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Didn't realize his arm looked good. I always thought it was a major question mark outside of 2B.
Posted
Brendan Harris could be on the market, with Reid Brignac on the way.

 

The question is, how much of Harris' performance this year is a fluke? His BABIP is .363, obviously unsustainable unless he keeps hitting line drives at a 28% rate. PECOTA certainly didn't forecast a season this good out of him. Fontenot's PECOTA has him averaging around a .345 OBP with a .750 OPS over the next five years. If you're going to go with a guy who's got pretty solid offense but a glove that works better at 3B/2B, why not just stick Fontenot there? He can probably do about the same as Harris, and you won't have to give up anything of value.

 

I'm still not convince Fonty can handle SS. Although, he does seem to have the range and the arm from what I've seen from him at 2B.

 

Depends what you mean by "handle." If you stick him there, he'll almost certainly be one of the five worst fielding SS in the majors. With a fly ball pitcher like Hill or Lilly on the mound, I'd have no problem putting him out there... maybe with Marquis, Zambrano and Miller, you work Theriot/Izturis in there, especially when the opposing pitcher is a lefty. It's a matter of trading for offense... with Fontenot you probably gain about 100 points of OPS (30 OBP, 70 SLG) but lose defense from Izturis. Is that worth it? I think so.

Posted
One of the MLB rumor sites reported that everyone on the Rangers is available except Michael Young. Since there will be teams after Texeira and a few of their relief pitchers, maybe we can find a way to swing a 3-way trade and pick up a SS by using some prospects, Izzy, and Jones.
Posted
One of the MLB rumor sites reported that everyone on the Rangers is available except Michael Young. Since there will be teams after Texeira and a few of their relief pitchers, maybe we can find a way to swing a 3-way trade and pick up a SS by using some prospects, Izzy, and Jones.

 

nobody wants those losers

Posted
I'm with Goony, I want to go big (ARod) or go cheap. A mediocre, expensive vet like Eckstein doesn't do much to improve the team.

 

Totally agree.

 

Tell me, IF A-Rod opts out - isn't he losing $27 mil a year? He'd really be an idiot to do that.

Posted
One of the MLB rumor sites reported that everyone on the Rangers is available except Michael Young. Since there will be teams after Texeira and a few of their relief pitchers, maybe we can find a way to swing a 3-way trade and pick up a SS by using some prospects, Izzy, and Jones.

 

I'd rather keep Teixeira for ourselves

Posted

Jones and Izturis add 0 value to any trade package.

 

These are the only 2 trade options.

 

Jim Hendry calls GM 1

 

Hey buddy, can you do me a solid, take this stiff Jones, I'll pay 75% of his contract, just give me some garbage prospect that nobody knows about so I can put out some spin on him.

 

Jim Hendry calls GM 2

 

Allright, we will do the deal for Zambrano, but if you are only gonna give us 2 top prospects you have to take this bum Izturis and 100% of his salary.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...