The 2006-2007 Chicago Bulls Thread

[Garwilly]

Bulls up 5 with 10 secs to go.....Anybody else catch that stat about all 3 teams in Chicago being over .500 at the same time since 1985. Thats crazy

 

The Hawks are 14-13-5. The 5 is not ties, they are OT losses. They have won 14 games, and lost 18. As much as it is reported, they are not over .500

 

Ah, I see. They just showed 14-13 on the tv

 

 

Yeah, my "rant" wasn't directed towards you at all.

[Soriano12]

That was one ***** look from Phil Jackson..lol.

 

he can go suck an egg. what's the big deal anyway? I never heard of such an unwritten rule. does it hurt Phil Jackson in anyway if the rookie runs in and slams it through the win?

 

I agree. Rookie mistake. Skiles quickly corrected him on it as well.

[CaliforniaRaisin]

That was one ***** look from Phil Jackson..lol.

 

Please don't swear on the boards. Thanks.

[David]

Bulls up 5 with 10 secs to go.....Anybody else catch that stat about all 3 teams in Chicago being over .500 at the same time since 1985. Thats crazy

 

 

 

How is that even possible?? The Blackhawks were in the playoffs for a bunch of years in a row before that finally ended 7 or 8 years ago. They were definitely a stron gteam in the early 90's. The Bulls obviously were.

 

Were the Bears never above .500 at any moment while the other two were during those years? Weren't they a playoff team in 91? Were they ever any good from 90-93??

 

I have no proof, but that just seems like it can't be right (aside from the fact that the Hawks aren't really above .500 right now).

[Andy]

Woo! Go Bulls! Looks like I missed a good one (although I've been very good about not missing many games this year).

[UMFan83]

Bulls up 5 with 10 secs to go.....Anybody else catch that stat about all 3 teams in Chicago being over .500 at the same time since 1985. Thats crazy

 

 

 

How is that even possible?? The Blackhawks were in the playoffs for a bunch of years in a row before that finally ended 7 or 8 years ago. They were definitely a stron gteam in the early 90's. The Bulls obviously were.

 

Were the Bears never above .500 at any moment while the other two were during those years? Weren't they a playoff team in 91? Were they ever any good from 90-93??

 

I have no proof, but that just seems like it can't be right (aside from the fact that the Hawks aren't really above .500 right now).

 

It was 1995

[Keener98]

Bulls up 5 with 10 secs to go.....Anybody else catch that stat about all 3 teams in Chicago being over .500 at the same time since 1985. Thats crazy

 

 

 

How is that even possible?? The Blackhawks were in the playoffs for a bunch of years in a row before that finally ended 7 or 8 years ago. They were definitely a stron gteam in the early 90's. The Bulls obviously were.

 

Were the Bears never above .500 at any moment while the other two were during those years? Weren't they a playoff team in 91? Were they ever any good from 90-93??

 

I have no proof, but that just seems like it can't be right (aside from the fact that the Hawks aren't really above .500 right now).

 

I agree, I found it to be really hard to believe. Maybe they said 1995. although I couldve sworn they said 85. I really dont know, but who cares the Bulls just won, and now I can stop hearing about how the Bulls havent beaten anybody above .500. And just for kicks and giggles....Hit the road Kobe!

[Keener98]

Bulls up 5 with 10 secs to go.....Anybody else catch that stat about all 3 teams in Chicago being over .500 at the same time since 1985. Thats crazy

 

 

 

How is that even possible?? The Blackhawks were in the playoffs for a bunch of years in a row before that finally ended 7 or 8 years ago. They were definitely a stron gteam in the early 90's. The Bulls obviously were.

 

Were the Bears never above .500 at any moment while the other two were during those years? Weren't they a playoff team in 91? Were they ever any good from 90-93??

 

I have no proof, but that just seems like it can't be right (aside from the fact that the Hawks aren't really above .500 right now).

 

It was 1995

 

Get out of my head lol. Thats what I get for trying to type, watch Bulls game, watch Il game, and eat supper at the same time lol.

[David]

Bulls up 5 with 10 secs to go.....Anybody else catch that stat about all 3 teams in Chicago being over .500 at the same time since 1985. Thats crazy

 

 

 

How is that even possible?? The Blackhawks were in the playoffs for a bunch of years in a row before that finally ended 7 or 8 years ago. They were definitely a stron gteam in the early 90's. The Bulls obviously were.

 

Were the Bears never above .500 at any moment while the other two were during those years? Weren't they a playoff team in 91? Were they ever any good from 90-93??

 

I have no proof, but that just seems like it can't be right (aside from the fact that the Hawks aren't really above .500 right now).

 

It was 1995

 

Makes a lot more sense... Thanks

 

EDIT - The Cubs were above .500 in 1995 too...(although that wouldn't exactly apply since we're talking about all teams being .500 at the same time)..

[Flames24Rulz]

This definitely made up for the NIU loss tonight. It was nice to hold Kobe in check for once and nice to get a win against a top Western Conference team.

[Keener98]

What the hell is this thread doing on page 3? lol Bulls take on the Knicks and the pathetic Isiah Thomas. Lets hope for a real beatdown.

[YearofDaCubs]

I'll be going to the game tomorrow, I can't wait.

[Derwood]

I thought a lot of games were supposed to be on national TV this year. Outside of WGN Saturdays and like 2 other games, there hasn't been much

[da bears]

Go Bulls! Hopefully they can continue the hot streak and pull within a game of Detroit tonight.

[Jon]

What the heck was that, Curry?

[Jon]

Has anyone seen this team's three-point shooting?

[Jon]

Not to mention Hinrich and their rebounding.

 

Down 54-51 at the half...

Edited December 23, 2006 by Jon

[da bears]

Nocioni needs to STOP SHOOTING THREE's. He's shooting terrible. Drive to the damn basket.

[soccer10k]

Can somebody remind the Bulls that they are playing the Knicks today and make sure that they actually show up in the second half? Because that would be great.

[da bears]

Can somebody remind the Bulls that they are playing the Knicks today and make sure that they actually show up in the second half? Because that would be great.

 

Yes it would be. They're playing terrible right now.

[Jon]

This is embarrassing.

[Flames24Rulz]

I swear, sometimes I get the feeling that this damn team just does this to me deliberately.

 

How the HELL can you be losing by 11 to the KNICKS?

[soccer10k]

How can you be losing to the Knicks, especially after the suspensions, by 14...

 

Unlike Denver, the Knicks didn't really lose anybody important because of the brawl. Robinson, Collins and Jeffries are all backups so the only thing they lost was depth.

[Jon]

How can you be losing to the Knicks, especially after the suspensions, by 14...

 

Unlike Denver, the Knicks didn't really lose anybody important because of the brawl. Robinson, Collins and Jeffries are all backups so the only thing they lost was depth.

And those guys who'd otherwise not see the court at all are in there in this joke of a game by the Bulls.

 

Can't box out on defense, nor can they shoot. Sigh.

[Jon]

Are the Bulls intentionally trying to see how many offensive boards they can allow?