Bradley could be a free agent???

[DesMoinesCub]

From:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AlnYBhHEHpuD3ivFFK4hUIYRvLYF?slug=cnnsi-ontheblock&prov=cnnsi&type=lgns

 

Milton Bradley He's had issues in the past with fans, the media, the law, his teammates, other players, front offices, his family, the dog across the street, the guy at the corner burger joint and just about everyone else he's ever met. He's also coming off knee surgery. But, hey, the guy is still young and he has plenty of talent (.290, 13 homers in 75 games) and he can play any outfield position. Any team that trades for him -- and he's been linked to anyone that needs an outfielder, including the Cubs, Pirates (who hired former L.A. manager Jim Tracy), Tigers, Nationals, Cubs and Yankees -- can probably get him for practically nothing. But then they'll have to offer him a contract for '06 and, most likely, go through salary arbitration. If a trade isn't pulled off, the Dodgers aren't expected to offer him a contract, which will make him a free agent. PREDICTION: He won't be traded, the Dodgers won't offer him a contract and he'll become a free agent in December.

 

 

 

Does anyone think the Cubs will wait to see if he becomes a free agent?

Obviously, if they trade for him, they will get a contract worked out for the next year.

[YearofDaCubs]

The listed the Cubs twice. It could be a good omen. :lol:

[wastra]

From:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AlnYBhHEHpuD3ivFFK4hUIYRvLYF?slug=cnnsi-ontheblock&prov=cnnsi&type=lgns

 

Milton Bradley He's had issues in the past with fans, the media, the law, his teammates, other players, front offices, his family, the dog across the street, the guy at the corner burger joint and just about everyone else he's ever met. He's also coming off knee surgery. But, hey, the guy is still young and he has plenty of talent (.290, 13 homers in 75 games) and he can play any outfield position. Any team that trades for him -- and he's been linked to anyone that needs an outfielder, including the Cubs, Pirates (who hired former L.A. manager Jim Tracy), Tigers, Nationals, Cubs and Yankees -- can probably get him for practically nothing. But then they'll have to offer him a contract for '06 and, most likely, go through salary arbitration. If a trade isn't pulled off, the Dodgers aren't expected to offer him a contract, which will make him a free agent. PREDICTION: He won't be traded, the Dodgers won't offer him a contract and he'll become a free agent in December.

 

 

 

Does anyone think the Cubs will wait to see if he becomes a free agent?

Obviously, if they trade for him, they will get a contract worked out for the next year.

 

 

Aren't we just one year removed from Hendry's unequivocable assertion that Chemistry wins pennants?

[YearofDaCubs]

From:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AlnYBhHEHpuD3ivFFK4hUIYRvLYF?slug=cnnsi-ontheblock&prov=cnnsi&type=lgns

 

Milton Bradley He's had issues in the past with fans, the media, the law, his teammates, other players, front offices, his family, the dog across the street, the guy at the corner burger joint and just about everyone else he's ever met. He's also coming off knee surgery. But, hey, the guy is still young and he has plenty of talent (.290, 13 homers in 75 games) and he can play any outfield position. Any team that trades for him -- and he's been linked to anyone that needs an outfielder, including the Cubs, Pirates (who hired former L.A. manager Jim Tracy), Tigers, Nationals, Cubs and Yankees -- can probably get him for practically nothing. But then they'll have to offer him a contract for '06 and, most likely, go through salary arbitration. If a trade isn't pulled off, the Dodgers aren't expected to offer him a contract, which will make him a free agent. PREDICTION: He won't be traded, the Dodgers won't offer him a contract and he'll become a free agent in December.

 

 

 

Does anyone think the Cubs will wait to see if he becomes a free agent?

Obviously, if they trade for him, they will get a contract worked out for the next year.

 

 

Aren't we just one year removed from Hendry's unequivocable assertion that Chemistry wins pennants?

Yeah, like Hendry has any idea about that..

[soapy]

From:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AlnYBhHEHpuD3ivFFK4hUIYRvLYF?slug=cnnsi-ontheblock&prov=cnnsi&type=lgns

 

Milton Bradley He's had issues in the past with fans, the media, the law, his teammates, other players, front offices, his family, the dog across the street, the guy at the corner burger joint and just about everyone else he's ever met. He's also coming off knee surgery. But, hey, the guy is still young and he has plenty of talent (.290, 13 homers in 75 games) and he can play any outfield position. Any team that trades for him -- and he's been linked to anyone that needs an outfielder, including the Cubs, Pirates (who hired former L.A. manager Jim Tracy), Tigers, Nationals, Cubs and Yankees -- can probably get him for practically nothing. But then they'll have to offer him a contract for '06 and, most likely, go through salary arbitration. If a trade isn't pulled off, the Dodgers aren't expected to offer him a contract, which will make him a free agent. PREDICTION: He won't be traded, the Dodgers won't offer him a contract and he'll become a free agent in December.

 

 

 

Does anyone think the Cubs will wait to see if he becomes a free agent?

Obviously, if they trade for him, they will get a contract worked out for the next year.

 

 

Aren't we just one year removed from Hendry's unequivocable assertion that Chemistry wins pennants?

 

Yeah, but that was last year. Now catching the ball wins pennants.

 

Okay, that joke is probably "played" at this point.

[vance_the_cubs_fan]

It would be smarter to try to trade for him assuming the Dodgers are reasonable in their demands. If he does become a FA, I'd hope the Cubs at least make him an offer. He's productive inspite of his problems.

[rawaction]

I'd trade for him. But it would be interesting to see who he would "choose" to play for as a FA.

[CubinNY]

I'd trade for him. But it would be interesting to see who he would "choose" to play for as a FA.

 

The Yankees. Then he would magically become a great guy to have around.

 

How sick would that be

 

Godzilla LF

Bradley CF

Giles RF

Shef DH

[Andy]

The listed the Cubs twice. It could be a good omen. :lol:

I agree! :)

[goonys evil twin]

I'd trade for him. But it would be interesting to see who he would "choose" to play for as a FA.

 

The Yankees. Then he would magically become a great guy to have around.

 

How sick would that be

 

Godzilla LF

Bradley CF

Giles RF

Shef DH

 

I'm pretty sure Giambi will be their primary DH this year.

[Guest]

I'd trade for him. But it would be interesting to see who he would "choose" to play for as a FA.

 

The Yankees. Then he would magically become a great guy to have around.

 

How sick would that be

 

Godzilla LF

Bradley CF

Giles RF

Shef DH

With an infield of

 

C - Posada

1B - Giambi

SS - Jeter

3B - ARod

2B - Does it really matter?

[sethuel1]

From:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AlnYBhHEHpuD3ivFFK4hUIYRvLYF?slug=cnnsi-ontheblock&prov=cnnsi&type=lgns

 

Milton Bradley He's had issues in the past with fans, the media, the law, his teammates, other players, front offices, his family, the dog across the street, the guy at the corner burger joint and just about everyone else he's ever met. He's also coming off knee surgery. But, hey, the guy is still young and he has plenty of talent (.290, 13 homers in 75 games) and he can play any outfield position. Any team that trades for him -- and he's been linked to anyone that needs an outfielder, including the Cubs, Pirates (who hired former L.A. manager Jim Tracy), Tigers, Nationals, Cubs and Yankees -- can probably get him for practically nothing. But then they'll have to offer him a contract for '06 and, most likely, go through salary arbitration. If a trade isn't pulled off, the Dodgers aren't expected to offer him a contract, which will make him a free agent. PREDICTION: He won't be traded, the Dodgers won't offer him a contract and he'll become a free agent in December.

 

 

 

Does anyone think the Cubs will wait to see if he becomes a free agent?

Obviously, if they trade for him, they will get a contract worked out for the next year.

 

 

Aren't we just one year removed from Hendry's unequivocable assertion that Chemistry wins pennants?

 

Yeah, but that was last year. Now catching the ball wins pennants.

 

Okay, that joke is probably "played" at this point.

 

I still like it.

 

And by "like it", I mean makes me smirk and then immediately want to shoot myself.

[Andy]

From:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AlnYBhHEHpuD3ivFFK4hUIYRvLYF?slug=cnnsi-ontheblock&prov=cnnsi&type=lgns

 

Milton Bradley He's had issues in the past with fans, the media, the law, his teammates, other players, front offices, his family, the dog across the street, the guy at the corner burger joint and just about everyone else he's ever met. He's also coming off knee surgery. But, hey, the guy is still young and he has plenty of talent (.290, 13 homers in 75 games) and he can play any outfield position. Any team that trades for him -- and he's been linked to anyone that needs an outfielder, including the Cubs, Pirates (who hired former L.A. manager Jim Tracy), Tigers, Nationals, Cubs and Yankees -- can probably get him for practically nothing. But then they'll have to offer him a contract for '06 and, most likely, go through salary arbitration. If a trade isn't pulled off, the Dodgers aren't expected to offer him a contract, which will make him a free agent. PREDICTION: He won't be traded, the Dodgers won't offer him a contract and he'll become a free agent in December.

 

 

 

Does anyone think the Cubs will wait to see if he becomes a free agent?

Obviously, if they trade for him, they will get a contract worked out for the next year.

 

 

Aren't we just one year removed from Hendry's unequivocable assertion that Chemistry wins pennants?

 

Yeah, but that was last year. Now catching the ball wins pennants.

 

Okay, that joke is probably "played" at this point.

 

I still like it.

 

And by "like it", I mean makes me smirk and then immediately want to shoot myself.

I use it the same way. And I probably will use it on and off until the Cubs finally win it all.

[beowulf28]

To this I say, who cares? I don't. I really don't want Milton Bradley on the Cubs. I don't care how good Dusty is supposedly is in keeping the peace. I don't want Milton Bradley on the Cubs!!!!

[DesMoinesCub]

Why??? Is it because of his "problems". Please explain more in depth as to your reasoning behind this.

 

 

I think his bat is much needed in the Cubs lineup. I don't know what the guy is like and from all accounts, it is not good, but let's see. If he can hit, get on base, and CATCH THE BALL ( I am even a Hendry backer and it fit in so well there), then he can be on the Cubs. As a teacher and coach myself, you always hear horror stories about how this kid is a pain in the butt, but until you actually see or meet the kid, you don't know. I have had many wonderful experiences with kids who were "trouble" and had terrible experiences with kids who are "good". Until someone proves me wrong, I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt. That being said, I would love to have Bradley on the Cubs.

 

Could we put something in his contract that says something about his behavior?

[beowulf28]

Why??? Is it because of his "problems". Please explain more in depth as to your reasoning behind this.

 

 

I think his bat is much needed in the Cubs lineup. I don't know what the guy is like and from all accounts, it is not good, but let's see. If he can hit, get on base, and CATCH THE BALL ( I am even a Hendry backer and it fit in so well there), then he can be on the Cubs. As a teacher and coach myself, you always hear horror stories about how this kid is a pain in the butt, but until you actually see or meet the kid, you don't know. I have had many wonderful experiences with kids who were "trouble" and had terrible experiences with kids who are "good". Until someone proves me wrong, I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt. That being said, I would love to have Bradley on the Cubs.

 

Could we put something in his contract that says something about his behavior?

 

Mostly, it's what I've heard or read about him in the media. Not that the media are always to be believed. Mostly, yes, it's his behavior. I wish I knew more about his offensive/defensive skills, but mostly, it's his behavior that scares me away from him. I guess it could be situational, but why take the chance on him being disruptive?

[Keener98]

Why??? Is it because of his "problems". Please explain more in depth as to your reasoning behind this.

 

 

I think his bat is much needed in the Cubs lineup. I don't know what the guy is like and from all accounts, it is not good, but let's see. If he can hit, get on base, and CATCH THE BALL ( I am even a Hendry backer and it fit in so well there), then he can be on the Cubs. As a teacher and coach myself, you always hear horror stories about how this kid is a pain in the butt, but until you actually see or meet the kid, you don't know. I have had many wonderful experiences with kids who were "trouble" and had terrible experiences with kids who are "good". Until someone proves me wrong, I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt. That being said, I would love to have Bradley on the Cubs.

 

Could we put something in his contract that says something about his behavior?

 

Mostly, it's what I've heard or read about him in the media. Not that the media are always to be believed. Mostly, yes, it's his behavior. I wish I knew more about his offensive/defensive skills, but mostly, it's his behavior that scares me away from him. I guess it could be situational, but why take the chance on him being disruptive?

 

1) Because he would be very cheap.

2) Because of the numbers that this "chance" is capable of putting up.

3) Because Dusty is our manager and this is supposed to be what he is good at, and he might as well do 1 thing he's good at because we all know in game managing, bullpen use, and lineup making arent what hes good at.