Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 656
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
5 minutes ago, cwood218 said:

To the shock of no one I think that list should have zero names on it.

Eric Dickerson is the text book example of why you don't take a running back in the first round.

Here is a list of Dickerson's draft class. DIckerson went 1.2

HOF QB:

1.14 HOF Jim Kelly

1.27 HOF Dan Marino

HOF OT:

1.6 HOF Jimbo Covert

1.9 HOF Bruce Matthews

HOF CB:

1.28 HOF Darrell Green

All five were better players at more important positions.

They weren’t as important positions back then. 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

Sometimes I wonder where a guy like Payton would be drafted these days, or if he even would be at all. 

Would Payton have been in the same situation in this era than he was in the '70's as far as scholarships, training, coaching, etc....

Posted
12 hours ago, minnesotacubsfan said:

fify

If your happy with Vince Ferragamo instead of Dan Marino then sure go ahead and draft Dickerson instead.

Posted
14 hours ago, Derwood said:

How much longer are we going to get SNF on NBC? Seems destined for Peacock

I doubt it happens anytime soon. Sunday night too good for the local NBC affiliates

Posted
1 hour ago, Brian707 said:

I doubt it happens anytime soon. Sunday night too good for the local NBC affiliates

I don’t think the US’s highest rated show year-after-year that makes bank for NBC and the NFL is moving to streaming anytime soon

Posted
On 9/13/2024 at 8:08 AM, raw said:

Is this before or after they are prepared to be eaten?

I won't put up the remix song, you've all seen it I'm sure

Good stuff, but nowhere near the all time classic "dead giveaway" remix

 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, cwood218 said:

If your happy with Vince Ferragamo instead of Dan Marino then sure go ahead and draft Dickerson instead.

Dickerson 1-0 SB

Marino 0-1 SB

 

 

Edited by minnesotacubsfan
  • Haha 2
Posted
57 minutes ago, Wilson A2000 said:

I don’t think the US’s highest rated show year-after-year that makes bank for NBC and the NFL is moving to streaming anytime soon

I wouldn't have thought that Thursday Night Football would move to streaming, but here we are

Posted
17 hours ago, cwood218 said:

To the shock of no one I think that list should have zero names on it.

Eric Dickerson is the text book example of why you don't take a running back in the first round.

Here is a list of first round Hall Of Fame players Dickerson's draft class. DIckerson went 1.2

QB:

1.14 Jim Kelly

1.27 Dan Marino

OT:

1.6 Jimbo Covert

1.9 Bruce Matthews

CB:

1.28 Darrell Green

All five were better players at more important positions.

So ED should have gone 1.8? Okay.

Posted
22 minutes ago, minnesotacubsfan said:

I dont think TNF ever had the ratings SNF has had tho

 

 

Maybe, but if the move from NBC to Peacock, they still get ad dollars PLUS the subscription. It's where sports is going

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, minnesotacubsfan said:

Dickerson 1-0 SB

Marino 0-1 SB

 

 

It’s such a dumb argument. Todays NFL and the way the game was played 20 years ago are not analogous. Running backs were a significant percentage of offensive production, now, for the most part they are not. 
 

End of Story. 

Edited by CubinNY
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, CubinNY said:

It’s such a dumb argument. Todays NFL and they way the game was played 20 years ago are not analogous. Running backs were a significant percentage of offensive production, now, for the most part they are not. 
 

End of Story. 

Even back then there are plenty of examples of teams not using first round picks on running backs and getting the same or better production out of the running back position. Usually with a running back by committee approach.

Some like the 49ers and Redskins even won the Super Bowl.

Edited by cwood218
Posted
2 hours ago, Tim said:

So ED should have gone 1.8? Okay.

No, ALL Running Backs are off the board until at best the second round. In a perfect world it would be third round or later. 

And to answer the question that probably just popped into your head after reading that sentence.

No, I'm not high.

It is my position, even back then, that most NFL GM's and Head Coaches were fumbling along as if trying to apply a Dusty Baker like strategy to football.

Drafting a running back in the first round. Is like having Neifi Perez lead off the game and then sacrificing him over to second base. Sure, there were times when it worked out and they hit on a player who racked up 1400-1600 yards or so on around 4.5-5.5 yards per carry. And then everyone gets to look on approvingly as if they had just witnessed Joe Morgan discussing the value of the RBI.

After Pittsburgh's victory in Super Bowl 14 ( 1979 season ) the old era essentially came to a close.  With a few exceptions here and there the Super Bowl started to be regularly won by teams that had embraced this new reality.

Ultimately, after the NFL had first implemented a salary cap. And then later mandated that all Quarterbacks wear skirts, it was over for the value of any individual Running Back. It's all about building that group with less valuable draft capital and only on cheap contracts. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, minnesotacubsfan said:

i think you're high. the NFC had several RB led teams win the SB after 1979; Bears, Redskins, Giants

 

 

Yes, as I wrote in the post above there are exceptions.

( 1 of 1 ) Bears - yes

( 1 of 3 ) Redskins - yes

( 2 of 3 ) Redskins - No

( 2 of 4 ) Giants - Yes

( 2 of 4 ) Giants - No

I never said teams couldn't have production from one or a group of RB's.

If you get one stud like Terrell Davis for a sixth rounder then excellent.

if you spend a second rounder for two years of Clinton Portis fine.

If you sign John Riggins as a free agent fine. Especially since there was no salary cap then.

Otherwise use less valuable draft picks ( never a first rounder ) or UDFA's or trades or sign free agent's.

Maybe it's mainly one back maybe it's a committee approach like the teams mark with a no above.

Also, after the salary cap started in 1993 ( or 4? ) be cheap with free agent RB's.

Edited by cwood218

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...