Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Kintzler has a $10 million team option next year and if it’s declined can exercise a $5 million player option, fwiw.

 

So he’ll back next year, right? There’s pretty much no way Kintzler turns down the $5M player option, right?

 

Don’t know if that makes the trade better or worse.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I like it, depending on the prospect.

 

He's not flashy or exiting but gets results. The fact that he gets groundballs and soft contact really helps with our defense. Also nice that he has a low walk rate, considdering some of our other pitchers.....

Posted

This trade deadline screams "in the playoffs we're fine with the guys already on the team who will get 99% of the innings, we just need to bridge all the 4th-7th innings until then".

 

I'm good with that, I just hope they're right about the health of Edwards and Morrow in particular to make sure that's still true in October.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Report is Jhon Romero going the other way. Lots of strikeouts, but also a 23-year-old reliever in A ball.
Posted
This trade deadline screams "in the playoffs we're fine with the guys already on the team who will get 99% of the innings

 

I've never been more convinced that Theo has a real drinking problem

Posted
Kintzler has a $10 million team option next year and if it’s declined can exercise a $5 million player option, fwiw.

 

So he’ll back next year, right? There’s pretty much no way Kintzler turns down the $5M player option, right?

 

Don’t know if that makes the trade better or worse.

If he pitches well/doesn’t get hurt I’m guessing he can get a decent multi year deal. Especially because he has “closing experience.” He could probably get 3 years at $5-8 mil aav

Posted
This trade deadline screams "in the playoffs we're fine with the guys already on the team who will get 99% of the innings

 

I've never been more convinced that Theo has a real drinking problem

 

Is this move the result of his drinking problem or because he wants to force himself to keep drinking?

Posted
Nice to see we are addressing our problem of too many mediocre pitchers by ... *checks notes* ... stockpiling more mediocre pitchers.

 

Justin Wilson has a 32% K rate and a 3.10 ERA, with an ERA under 2.5 since his crummy April. He's the 5th best reliever in the pen, with none of the 4 above him being flukish. Montgomery, Chavez, and Kintzler are all worthwhile relievers to have by any definition, and they would join the 5 in a postseason pen. The Cubs don't have a shortage of good pitchers. Would it have been better to get someone better than Kintzler? Sure, I would've loved Yates, but this is also the nadir of the trade value of the farm system until the college SP start reaching AA en masse so I can understand it not being worth it when you've got a pen deep enough to shorten the game that much.

Posted
This trade deadline screams "in the playoffs we're fine with the guys already on the team who will get 99% of the innings

 

I've never been more convinced that Theo has a real drinking problem

 

Is this move the result of his drinking problem or because he wants to force himself to keep drinking?

 

Posted
Nice to see we are addressing our problem of too many mediocre pitchers by ... *checks notes* ... stockpiling more mediocre pitchers.

 

Justin Wilson has a 32% K rate and a 3.10 ERA, with an ERA under 2.5 since his crummy April. He's the 5th best reliever in the pen, with none of the 4 above him being flukish. Montgomery, Chavez, and Kintzler are all worthwhile relievers to have by any definition, and they would join the 5 in a postseason pen. The Cubs don't have a shortage of good pitchers. Would it have been better to get someone better than Kintzler? Sure, I would've loved Yates, but this is also the nadir of the trade value of the farm system until the college SP start reaching AA en masse so I can understand it not being worth it when you've got a pen deep enough to shorten the game that much.

 

Add “stats if you take out the times he sucked” to my strike through list.

Posted

Starters (4):

Lester

Yu

Hendricks

Q

 

Relievers (8):

Morrow

CJ

Strop

Cishek

Chavez

Monty

Wilson

Kintzler

 

This is a good staff for the playoffs. I suppose you could find a way to squeeze in Hamels if you really wanted to (dropping TLS or Bote, which I probably wouldn't do) or if Yu somehow isn't healthy by then. We already know what the offense is capable of, so let's just get healthy and see what happens.

Posted

That’s a great staff for the 2016 playoffs. We already won that one. It’s kinda pukey for the 2018 playoffs.

 

The best FIP or xFIP among that projected playoff rotation is 3.94. If that was happening to a rival we would be all over it.

Posted
he's a little too amped about this but posting it for the info either way

 

 

 

[tweet]

[/tweet]

 

Soft contact and low ground ball rate, so he's the anti-Hamels

Low walk rate, so he's the anti-Chatwood

Posted
That’s a great staff for the 2016 playoffs. We already won that one. It’s kinda pukey for the 2018 playoffs.

 

The best FIP or xFIP among that projected playoff rotation is 3.94. If that was happening to a rival we would be all over it.

 

Yeah its a bit of a gamble but I don't think the Cubs could have gotten a difference making starter without having to trade Happ/Russell/etc. They didn't want to so instead pivoted to having the best and deepest offense combined with a very deep bullpen that can hold the fort down if the starters can't get it together. Also, the starters getting it together is still a legit possibility when you consider their track records, age and in the case of Darvish return from injury. I think its a smart play albeit not completely ideal.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
That’s a great staff for the 2016 playoffs. We already won that one. It’s kinda pukey for the 2018 playoffs.

 

The best FIP or xFIP among that projected playoff rotation is 3.94. If that was happening to a rival we would be all over it.

 

not striking anybody out and giving up soft contact for an elite defense is the new market inefficiency

 

(i'm only 97% kidding)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...