Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
I'm getting on a plane for the next four hours so obviously this will go down while I'm in the air. The Butler trade happened the same way.

 

wow, i have no idea where i was when the cubs got eddie butler.

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I'm getting on a plane for the next four hours so obviously this will go down while I'm in the air. The Butler trade happened the same way.

 

I'm not sure that flying during the NBA draft when it was by far the most likely time for Butler to be traded is proof that you have some sort of major news happening voodoo when flying.

 

(says the guy that loves to comment about things like 'team record when I attend games')

Posted
I keep reading articles regurgitating that the Brewers have been among the most aggressive in pursuing Darvish. Everyone's favorite say-nothing man, Heyman, had another article uttering something along those lines. What the hell does that even mean? Short of offering him the biggest offer (something we've heard nothing about yet), how are the Brewers any more aggressive than anyone else? Is Stearns calling him every few hours, asking if he's done washing his hair yet? Did someone put a horse head (with a Brewer's logo branded into the fur) in his bed?
Posted
This account broke the Cain and Yelich moves, fwiw. May just be that Brewer board insiders account.

 

 

Which would seem to make more sense, unless they are ready to go into a team-high payroll area.

 

I suppose they could still empty the farm and get Archer.

Posted
This account broke the Cain and Yelich moves, fwiw. May just be that Brewer board insiders account.

 

 

Which would seem to make more sense, unless they are ready to go into a team-high payroll area.

 

I suppose they could still empty the farm and get Archer.

Agree. Darvish or Jake put them at about their spending threshold historically under Antanosio. They have the pieces to do an Archer or lesser trade for Odorizzi, Corbin, Tehran, etc. and it’s probably the smarter move for them. Or they can wait until mid season/next offseason when the Jays realize they suck and want to move Stroman.

Posted
One of the MLB network guys mentioned a valid point last night. The Brewers along with every team in baseball got $50M from the sale of BAMTech which could help ease payroll constraints.
Posted
I'm getting on a plane for the next four hours so obviously this will go down while I'm in the air. The Butler trade happened the same way.

 

For a second I thought you meant Eddie Butler.

Posted
One of the MLB network guys mentioned a valid point last night. The Brewers along with every team in baseball got $50M from the sale of BAMTech which could help ease payroll constraints.

 

I think it was more like $70m. But that's a one time payment, so I'm not sure that matters in the least.

Posted
The next person who posts anything from that doofus should be banned from the Transaction thread for a year

 

agreed. i generally want to read every possibly useful rumor, but that guy can go to hell.

Posted

Neuby wrote:

One of the MLB network guys mentioned a valid point last night. The Brewers along with every team in baseball got $50M from the sale of BAMTech which could help ease payroll constraints.

 

 

I think it was more like $70m. But that's a one time payment, so I'm not sure that matters in the least.

 

 

https://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2017/12/15/16781058/every-mlb-owner-50-million-windfall-2018

 

$50M

 

The Brewers being a small market club could therotically use that coin to cover overages on a $$$ free agent starter deal that wasn't already in the budget.

Posted
i'm pretty sure when that news broke it was also said that this was entirely expected and that teams had already been accounting for it for a long time.
Posted

Neuby wrote:

One of the MLB network guys mentioned a valid point last night. The Brewers along with every team in baseball got $50M from the sale of BAMTech which could help ease payroll constraints.

 

 

I think it was more like $70m. But that's a one time payment, so I'm not sure that matters in the least.

 

 

https://www.bleedcubbieblue.com/2017/12/15/16781058/every-mlb-owner-50-million-windfall-2018

 

$50M

 

The Brewers being a small market club could therotically use that coin to cover overages on a $$$ free agent starter deal that wasn't already in the budget.

 

That's what was reported. Reality was they were expecting more like $70m. It's irrelevant to the pursuit oF free agents, unless, I suppose, they want to sign Darvish to a 1 year $50m deal.

 

$68m reported here.

Posted
Brewer insider guy says he thinks, based on what he’s heard, Archer will be a Brewer and Darvish will not and Cobb will be their FA addition.
Posted (edited)
Brewer insider guy says he thinks, based on what he’s heard, Archer will be a Brewer and Darvish will not and Cobb will be their FA addition.

 

Well, that’s not great.

I’m kinda low on Archer (recent velo dips, bicep or forearm issues I think, can’t get through and order 3 times, only has 2 pitches, gives up lots of hard contact), he’s no doubt good and makes them better but there’s some major red flags. Hopefully he costs them a ton like Santana and Hiura or Burnes or Woodruff and others prospects.

 

Should also add he mentioned the Brewers had a Darvish centered meeting today (internally, Darvish didn’t meet with them) with this news now about the targets/acquisitions I’d think they think they are out of it or are done pursuing him.

Edited by Cubswin11
Posted

I feel like the asking price for Archer is prohibitively high, otherwise he'd have been moved by now. I think it would cost the Brewers Santana plus 2-3 of their best remaining prospects. It would be a full buy-in move, and I don't believe it will happen.

 

Even if it did, I don't think it would change things a great deal.

Posted
I feel like the asking price for Archer is prohibitively high, otherwise he'd have been moved by now. I think it would cost the Brewers Santana plus 2-3 of their best remaining prospects. It would be a full buy-in move, and I don't believe it will happen.

 

Even if it did, I don't think it would change things a great deal.

Sterns and others in their FO did come from Tampa Bay so no doubt there’s some familiarity. But yes I’d guess it would be expensive and TB has been known to be tough to deal with in the past on guys on asking prices (which Sterns was there for a part of so I assume he knows what he’s getting in to/what makes them tick). Overall agree things don’t change a ton, it seems like they are trying to lock in last years performance with new guys this year that are knowing commodities. Yelich is a safe bet to make up Santana’s WAR, Cain is a safer bet than Broxton/Phillips in CF and Archer is a bet to make up for Nelson’s WAR since he’s hurt and/or Anderson regression.

Posted
I feel like the asking price for Archer is prohibitively high, otherwise he'd have been moved by now. I think it would cost the Brewers Santana plus 2-3 of their best remaining prospects. It would be a full buy-in move, and I don't believe it will happen.

 

Even if it did, I don't think it would change things a great deal.

 

That Brewer guy seems to be money, though. If he said Archer is going to be a Brewer, I believe him.

 

But, yeah, I would assume it will take some of their remaining top prospects. Interested to see how much they will spend on Cobb.

Posted
I feel like the asking price for Archer is prohibitively high, otherwise he'd have been moved by now. I think it would cost the Brewers Santana plus 2-3 of their best remaining prospects. It would be a full buy-in move, and I don't believe it will happen.

 

Even if it did, I don't think it would change things a great deal.

Sterns and others in their FO did come from Tampa Bay so no doubt there’s some familiarity. But yes I’d guess it would be expensive and TB has been known to be tough to deal with in the past on guys on asking prices (which Sterns was there for a part of so I assume he knows what he’s getting in to/what makes them tick). Overall agree things don’t change a ton, it seems like they are trying to lock in last years performance with new guys this year that are knowing commodities. Yelich is a safe bet to make up Santana’s WAR, Cain is a safer bet than Broxton/Phillips in CF and Archer is a bet to make up for Nelson’s WAR since he’s hurt and/or Anderson regression.

 

Stearns was never in Tampa, right?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...