Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
A pinch hitter is really no different than a player being traded from a team out of contention (the bench) to a team in contention (the lineup) so really we should all expect them to get better when pinch hitting.
  • Replies 657
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Castellanos has a .607 OPS as a pinch hitter, can't keep him.

 

Rizzo is at .478, might be time to put him out to pasture too.

 

Baez is at .542, definitely pump the breaks on his extension.

 

Bryant is at .583, the gutless choking dog.

 

Thankfully, the MLB leader in pinch hitting the last 3 years(min 10 PA of course) is going to be available, so we can snap up Adam Jones and fill that gaping hole in the roster.

Posted
I still think the best move is to sign Castellanos and listen to offers for Schwarber. He's fun to watch when he's on a roll, but he can't hit lefties, can't pinch hit, and needs to be replaced defensively in close games. He's a great option for being a DH/platoon OF in the AL.

Why can’t he pinch hit?

 

 

His track record as a PH is atrocious.

 

Significantly better than your track record as a poster

Posted

 

That all arguably applies to Castellanos, too, except against righties.

 

 

Schwarber against lefties - .195/.306/.351/.657

 

 

Castellanos against righties - .268/.315/.450/.765

 

You post this like those are good numbers.

 

 

They're way better than Schwarber's.

Posted
Castellanos has a .607 OPS as a pinch hitter, can't keep him.

 

Rizzo is at .478, might be time to put him out to pasture too.

 

Baez is at .542, definitely pump the breaks on his extension.

 

Bryant is at .583, the gutless choking dog.

 

Thankfully, the MLB leader in pinch hitting the last 3 years(min 10 PA of course) is going to be available, so we can snap up Adam Jones and fill that gaping hole in the roster.

 

The guy I would go after to replace Zobrist and pinch hit is Howie Kendrick.

Posted
Even Edith Cox would be embarrassed by worrying about PH numbers, B2B. What the hell.

 

 

My point is that while he's great at what he does (mash HRs against RH pitching), he has many flaws - lefties, defense, etc.

Posted
Castellanos has a .607 OPS as a pinch hitter, can't keep him.

 

Rizzo is at .478, might be time to put him out to pasture too.

 

Baez is at .542, definitely pump the breaks on his extension.

 

Bryant is at .583, the gutless choking dog.

 

Thankfully, the MLB leader in pinch hitting the last 3 years(min 10 PA of course) is going to be available, so we can snap up Adam Jones and fill that gaping hole in the roster.

 

The guy I would go after to replace Zobrist and pinch hit is Howie Kendrick.

 

What does that have to do with Schwarber?

Posted

 

 

Schwarber against lefties - .195/.306/.351/.657

 

 

Castellanos against righties - .268/.315/.450/.765

 

You post this like those are good numbers.

 

 

They're way better than Schwarber's.

 

THEY'RE STILL BAD NUMBERS.

 

And they're against the type of pitcher players see a lot more of, so how are you possibly seeing this as an argument in favor of keeping Castellanos and getting rid of Schwarber?

 

Schwarber in his career against righties: .239 .344 .515 .859 (1435 PA)

 

Castellanos, again, in his career against righties: .268 .315 .450 .765 (2718 PA)

 

Unless you're buying in to some kind of Hendry-like idea that you need to try and make the team better at hitting lefties, what the hell are you even talking about.

Posted
Assuming the Cubs need to make trades to fill some of their holes, Schwarber and Caratini are the only somewhat valuable assets on the roster. I don't think any of the core 4 will be traded, so that leaves the top prospects (Amaya, Hoerner, etc.) or players on the roster.
Posted
Even Edith Cox would be embarrassed by worrying about PH numbers, B2B. What the hell.

 

 

My point is that while he's great at what he does (mash HRs against RH pitching), he has many flaws - lefties, defense, etc.

 

So now we're dropping the whole pinch hitting thing into an all encompassing "etc" huh? Telling.

 

Castellanos hits lefties better than Schwarber hits righties. Castellanos hits righties better than Schwarber hits lefties. Schwarber has been much better defensively than Castellanos. How you want to weigh all those is up to you. Also worth noting that Schwarber for the next 2 years will cost about as much as Castellnos for about 4 months.

Posted
Even Edith Cox would be embarrassed by worrying about PH numbers, B2B. What the hell.

 

 

My point is that while he's great at what he does (mash HRs against RH pitching), he has many flaws - lefties, defense, etc.

 

"Besides him being good at hitting the prevelant type of pitcher in the game, he's simply not that good, you guys."

 

And Castellanos is HUGELY worse defensively. And, since you brought up the PH nonsense, as a PH he has a .250 .294 .313 .607 line.

Posted (edited)
Castellanos has a .607 OPS as a pinch hitter, can't keep him.

 

Rizzo is at .478, might be time to put him out to pasture too.

 

Baez is at .542, definitely pump the breaks on his extension.

 

Bryant is at .583, the gutless choking dog.

 

Thankfully, the MLB leader in pinch hitting the last 3 years(min 10 PA of course) is going to be available, so we can snap up Adam Jones and fill that gaping hole in the roster.

 

The guy I would go after to replace Zobrist and pinch hit is Howie Kendrick.

With the year he’s having I’m guessing Kendrick. gets a near everyday job somewhere next year and I don’t think we’d give it to him/hope we’d aim higher for an everyday guy as idk how much of what he’s doing is real. The goal should be to find the next 2019 Kendrick (or 2018 Descalso) on the cheap before they have a big year like this instead of paying for the guy after he has the big year that may be flukey for a bench/role spot.

Edited by Cubswin11
Posted
Like, why would anyone look at the Cubs OF and think that signing a guy like Castellanos should lead to them getting rid of Schwarber instead of getting rid of Heyward by any means necessary?
Posted
I think for me the Schwarber question is really a juiced ball question. If you think the 2019 ball is the new normal, that makes his prodigious power much less valuable and he simply doesn't do enough other stuff to make him more than an average player. And that comes with some pretty annoying limitations like his defensive range and his trouble with lefties. But if you think we're going to go back to the no-juice 2014 ball, or more likely the 2018 sort-of-juiced ball, I think his power will take less of a hit than 99% of guys and his value rises commensurately.

 

This is underselling his approach. He's cut his Ks again, walks a ton, and is hitting with more power...Without looking at anything else those are breakout ingredients

 

Yeah, dude is hitting for the whole package right now. Not to harp on Heyward (well, no; let's harp on him), but THERE'S the guy clearly benefiting from the juiced ball and absolutely nothing else.

Posted
I think for me the Schwarber question is really a juiced ball question. If you think the 2019 ball is the new normal, that makes his prodigious power much less valuable and he simply doesn't do enough other stuff to make him more than an average player. And that comes with some pretty annoying limitations like his defensive range and his trouble with lefties. But if you think we're going to go back to the no-juice 2014 ball, or more likely the 2018 sort-of-juiced ball, I think his power will take less of a hit than 99% of guys and his value rises commensurately.

 

This is underselling his approach. He's cut his Ks again, walks a ton, and is hitting with more power...Without looking at anything else those are breakout ingredients

 

If this last month+ is a real breakout, then absolutely. More likely though is it's just a nice hot streak. He's cut his K rate to 25% this year, which is great, but if homeruns continue to be as cheap in 2020 as they have been in 2019, at 25% his offensive ceiling is still limited to like a 120 wrc+. That's certainly nothing to complain about, but from a left fielder with his defense that's merely a solid regular.

Posted
I think for me the Schwarber question is really a juiced ball question. If you think the 2019 ball is the new normal, that makes his prodigious power much less valuable and he simply doesn't do enough other stuff to make him more than an average player. And that comes with some pretty annoying limitations like his defensive range and his trouble with lefties. But if you think we're going to go back to the no-juice 2014 ball, or more likely the 2018 sort-of-juiced ball, I think his power will take less of a hit than 99% of guys and his value rises commensurately.

 

This is underselling his approach. He's cut his Ks again, walks a ton, and is hitting with more power...Without looking at anything else those are breakout ingredients

 

If this last month+ is a real breakout, then absolutely. More likely though is it's just a nice hot streak. He's cut his K rate to 25% this year, which is great, but if homeruns continue to be as cheap in 2020 as they have been in 2019, at 25% his offensive ceiling is still limited to like a 120 wrc+. That's certainly nothing to complain about, but from a left fielder with his defense that's merely a solid regular.

 

Maybe I'm not thinking about this right, but I don't see how the juiced ball really impacts his value relative to other players. Everyone is playing with it. He was 37th in baseball in home runs last year, this year he's getting more ABs and he's 20th. Everyone else is hitting more home runs, but so is he, so I don't get how his value drops. To use non-specific numbers, hitting 125% of the league average is equally valuable is the league average is 15 or 20.

Posted
Assuming the Cubs need to make trades to fill some of their holes, Schwarber and Caratini are the only somewhat valuable assets on the roster. I don't think any of the core 4 will be traded, so that leaves the top prospects (Amaya, Hoerner, etc.) or players on the roster.

 

Soler was traded like 3 years ago

Posted (edited)

 

This is underselling his approach. He's cut his Ks again, walks a ton, and is hitting with more power...Without looking at anything else those are breakout ingredients

 

If this last month+ is a real breakout, then absolutely. More likely though is it's just a nice hot streak. He's cut his K rate to 25% this year, which is great, but if homeruns continue to be as cheap in 2020 as they have been in 2019, at 25% his offensive ceiling is still limited to like a 120 wrc+. That's certainly nothing to complain about, but from a left fielder with his defense that's merely a solid regular.

 

Maybe I'm not thinking about this right, but I don't see how the juiced ball really impacts his value relative to other players. Everyone is playing with it. He was 37th in baseball in home runs last year, this year he's getting more ABs and he's 20th. Everyone else is hitting more home runs, but so is he, so I don't get how his value drops. To use non-specific numbers, hitting 125% of the league average is equally valuable is the league average is 15 or 20.

 

Schwarber's HR/FB rates the last three years:

 

2017 - 24.0

2018 - 24.5

2019 - 24.1

 

Edit: For context, league wide HR/FB the last three years is 13.7, 12.7, 15.4

 

He's NOT getting the big boost from the ball. His well struck balls were always dongs, but now they are just going another 10-15 feet. Schwarber's .844 OPS this year isn't that notable because the league average is .760. But if the ball reverts, and the league average OPS goes back to last year's. 728 or (god forbid) 2014's .700, suddenly he's back to being a feared slugger.

 

Honestly I think this is the primary reason the shine is off the apple for most of our offensive core, but that's a whole other thing.

Edited by Bertz
Posted
Castellanos has a .607 OPS as a pinch hitter, can't keep him.

 

Rizzo is at .478, might be time to put him out to pasture too.

 

Baez is at .542, definitely pump the breaks on his extension.

 

Bryant is at .583, the gutless choking dog.

 

Thankfully, the MLB leader in pinch hitting the last 3 years(min 10 PA of course) is going to be available, so we can snap up Adam Jones and fill that gaping hole in the roster.

 

The guy I would go after to replace Zobrist and pinch hit is Howie Kendrick.

 

viewtopic.php?p=364499#p364499

Posted
Like, why would anyone look at the Cubs OF and think that signing a guy like Castellanos should lead to them getting rid of Schwarber instead of getting rid of Heyward by any means necessary?

 

 

Good luck with that plan.

Posted
Like, why would anyone look at the Cubs OF and think that signing a guy like Castellanos should lead to them getting rid of Schwarber instead of getting rid of Heyward by any means necessary?

 

 

Good luck with that plan.

 

Yes, if only we could find other examples of teams doing what needs to be done to dump bad long term contracts. SURELY IT HAS NEVER HAPPENED.

Posted
Castellanos has a .607 OPS as a pinch hitter, can't keep him.

 

Rizzo is at .478, might be time to put him out to pasture too.

 

Baez is at .542, definitely pump the breaks on his extension.

 

Bryant is at .583, the gutless choking dog.

 

Thankfully, the MLB leader in pinch hitting the last 3 years(min 10 PA of course) is going to be available, so we can snap up Adam Jones and fill that gaping hole in the roster.

 

The guy I would go after to replace Zobrist and pinch hit is Howie Kendrick.

With the year he’s having I’m guessing Kendrick. gets a near everyday job somewhere next year and I don’t think we’d give it to him/hope we’d aim higher for an everyday guy as idk how much of what he’s doing is real. The goal should be to find the next 2019 Kendrick (or 2018 Descalso) on the cheap before they have a big year like this instead of paying for the guy after he has the big year that may be flukey for a bench/role spot.

 

 

He's having a great season, but he's been really good over his whole career. IDK what he'll get in the off season, but he could get quite a few AB by filling the Zobrist role.

Posted
Like, why would anyone look at the Cubs OF and think that signing a guy like Castellanos should lead to them getting rid of Schwarber instead of getting rid of Heyward by any means necessary?

 

 

Good luck with that plan.

 

Yes, if only we could find other examples of teams doing what needs to be done to dump bad long term contracts. SURELY IT HAS NEVER HAPPENED.

 

 

Except we don't need another bad contract or some nothing "prospect" plus it gives us one more hole to fill on the field.

Posted
Barring the juiciness continuing, Heyward IS a already a hole to fill. The dude got a reprieve from his declining defensive value because of the power boost. Work out ye olde swap a bad long term contract for a bad short term contract that's more expensive per year and be done with it. horsefeathers the Ricketteseseseseseses' money. Either you get rid of him or relegate him as a 4th OFer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...