Patrick Kane Rape Investigation

[Wilson A2000]

@SWhyno

 

Hamburg Police says in statement that its handling of evidence and chain of custody "is unassailable" in Kane case.

 

Except for it ending up on the mother's doorstep

[Sammy Sofa]

This is now not only officially a Law & Order "ripped from the headlines" episode; this is officially a [expletive] crossover between the mothership, Criminal Intent and SVU.

 

If it was an SVU episode, it'd be too unrealistic.

 

Stabler would have already punched through, like, six walls.

 

Also:

 

http://i.onionstatic.com/avclub/5541/72/16x9/960.jpg

[UMFan83]

@SWhyno

 

Hamburg Police says in statement that its handling of evidence and chain of custody "is unassailable" in Kane case.

 

Seriously? Then how did the evidence end up on the doorstep? Are they saying its fake? Because if its not fake, there is definitely a hole in their handling of the evidence, whether a fellow cop did it or someone else.

[Wilson A2000]

@SWhyno

 

Hamburg Police says in statement that its handling of evidence and chain of custody "is unassailable" in Kane case.

 

Seriously? Then how did the evidence end up on the doorstep? Are they saying its fake? Because if its not fake, there is definitely a hole in their handling of the evidence, whether a fellow cop did it or someone else.

 

Unless "handling" doesn't mean someone else breaking into the evidence room and stealing it. "Handling" is just what the people who were supposed to have the evidence did with it.

[Guest]

Who goes through a dumpster and finds a tampered with rape kit, and then delivers it to the mother of the victim? How many people even know who the victim is? How many people know who the victim is and knows where her mother lives? Why would someone just toss a rape kit into a dumpster where it could be found at all? How does the person who found the rape kit know to go dumpster diving to look for one?

 

Forget Law and Order and SVU. It's time for a new season of True Detective.

[Wilson A2000]

Has the DA admitted he doesn't have it yet?

[Wilson A2000]

Who goes through a dumpster and finds a tampered with rape kit, and then delivers it to the mother of the victim? How many people even know who the victim is? How many people know who the victim is and knows where her mother lives? Why would someone just toss a rape kit into a dumpster where it could be found at all? How does the person who found the rape kit know to go dumpster diving to look for one?

 

Forget Law and Order and SVU. It's time for a new season of True Detective.

 

Bad cop tampered. Good cop heard about it and delivered it to the mother of the accuser?

[biittner77]

Is it also possible that they wrote her name on a rape kit, forgot to seal something inside, tore it open and then sealed it in a new envelope? That would explain the torn envelope ending up in the trash. It doesn't explain why anyone would dumpster dive for it though.

[Wilson A2000]

Is it also possible that they wrote her name on a rape kit, forgot to seal something inside, tore it open and then sealed it in a new envelope? That would explain the torn envelope ending up in the trash. It doesn't explain why anyone would dumpster dive for it though.

 

Who is they "they"? Why would they be so stupid?

[Guest]

Is it also possible that they wrote her name on a rape kit, forgot to seal something inside, tore it open and then sealed it in a new envelope? That would explain the torn envelope ending up in the trash. It doesn't explain why anyone would dumpster dive for it though.

 

Who is they "they"? Why would they be so stupid?

 

You can't tell who they is from the context?

[Wilson A2000]

Accuser's lawyer says he confirmed this is the original rape kit

[biittner77]

I meant the person administering the kit accidentally forgot to seal something in the envelope so that person tore it opened and put everything in a new envelope. Maybe they threw it in the trash thinking that it wouldn't be worth noting that they threw away the empty envelope.

[Wilson A2000]

Is it also possible that they wrote her name on a rape kit, forgot to seal something inside, tore it open and then sealed it in a new envelope? That would explain the torn envelope ending up in the trash. It doesn't explain why anyone would dumpster dive for it though.

 

Who is they "they"? Why would they be so stupid?

 

You can't tell who they is from the context?

 

You can't tell that I wasn't sure? Didn't know if he meant the nurse or who stole it.

Edited September 23, 2015 by Wilson A2000

[RammyFanny]

Now Kane's lawyer is saying there was a mixture of DNA below the waist from people not named Kane.

 

Fairly certain the victim's lawyer had just said that rumor wasn't true towards the end of his Q&A. Pretty sure someone asked "are you denying that there was multiple men's DNA found?" and he said they were in fact denying.

 

I don't know what's going on. That seems fairly obvious to answer.

[Sammy Sofa]

You can't tell that I wasn't sure? Didn't know if he meant the nurse or who stole it.

 

Ugh, you'd definitely be the Serena.

[Banedon]

All Kane's lawyer has to do is make this messier and messier. The more that facts get obscured, the easier it is for Kane to walk. And that's his job here.

 

So far, he's doing a pretty damn good job.

[Wilson A2000]

Would you put Kane being involved in stealing the rape kit past him?

[Sammy Sofa]

Would you put Kane being involved in stealing the rape kit past him?

 

Uh, yeah, pretty sure Patrick Kane himself didn't steal the damn evidence envelope. What the hell are you even talking about.

[Wilson A2000]

Would you put Kane being involved in stealing the rape kit past him?

 

Uh, yeah, pretty sure Patrick Kane himself didn't steal the damn evidence envelope. What the hell are you even talking about.

 

Involved doesn't mean doing it himself. Maybe paying or talking to a cop. Wasn't he paying one to be his bodyguard already?

[Sammy Sofa]

People use police officers for security all the time. If tampering or whatever actually occurred I'd think it would likely be someone doing it thinking they were helping him as opposed to being ordered to do so by Kane or his lawyer. I mean, yeah, Kane seems like a raging moron of the highest order, but I don't think he's a COMPLETE monster of stupidity.

[USSoccer]

Would you put Kane being involved in stealing the rape kit past him?

 

Uh, yeah, pretty sure Patrick Kane himself didn't steal the damn evidence envelope. What the hell are you even talking about.

 

Involved doesn't mean doing it himself. Maybe paying or talking to a cop. Wasn't he paying one to be his bodyguard already?

 

To what end? Render evidence that helps him in court inadmissible?

[Wilson A2000]

Would you put Kane being involved in stealing the rape kit past him?

 

Uh, yeah, pretty sure Patrick Kane himself didn't steal the damn evidence envelope. What the hell are you even talking about.

 

Involved doesn't mean doing it himself. Maybe paying or talking to a cop. Wasn't he paying one to be his bodyguard already?

 

To what end? Render evidence that helps him in court inadmissible?

 

We don't know what the rape kit said yet, only Kane's attorney's claim

[Banedon]

Oh ffs....fix your quotes.

[Wilson A2000]

Oh ffs....fix your quotes.

 

Me? Sorry. The app messes the quotes up still I guess.

[RammyFanny]

[tweet]

[/tweet]