Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Then say that instead of making condescending statements about people not learning from last year when that draft goes completely against your point.

 

no it doesn't. people jumped to conclusions too early about the draft last year when all the signs were that the cubs were going to bring in at least one overslot. now all the signs are that the cubs will bring in at least one overslot. they're clearly going to spend as much as they can without losing a first round pick, since that's what they've done every year since the new rules came in.

 

That's not entirely true either. They left close to 300K on the table in 2013. Not saying I blame them, it's tough to know who's going to be out there for you, and to nail the number you can get each of your draftees signed for.

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
As a side note, the 2010 draft looks bad at the top ... but there's a chance four guys from that draft could see decent MLB careers (Szczur, Jokisch, Beeler, and Aaron Kurcz is actually doing okay in the upper levels as a pen arm). No studs from that draft, but honestly ... getting 4 guys up the AAA with a shot at the bigs ... isn't bad. Not great, but not bad.

 

I think that's pretty unequivocally bad, myself.

 

That said, the 2011 draft is a good example, there's a bunch of guys who were cause for draft day excitement and then again when they were able to be signed. Gretzky, Lockhart, Dunston, Martin, Maples, Shoulders, the Cubs absolutely won the day(s) of the draft. The certainty about what prospects are better than others after the first...5 picks(not rounds, picks) or so, and sometimes not even then(Schwarber) is vastly, vastly overstated.

 

I don't think it's an unfair assessment to say that's bad. I just feel differently. I think it's much harder than fans acknowledge to get guys up to AAA (hence why we see so many re-treads at AAA hanging around) and close to a cup of tea in the bigs. 3 of the 4 from 2010 have gotten big league time. If I dug around, I could probably find multiple draft years where teams haven't gotten anyone to the bigs.

 

By no means am I saying it's a good draft. I guess it comes down to what one views as a win.

Posted

Then say that instead of making condescending statements about people not learning from last year when that draft goes completely against your point.

 

no it doesn't. people jumped to conclusions too early about the draft last year when all the signs were that the cubs were going to bring in at least one overslot. now all the signs are that the cubs will bring in at least one overslot. they're clearly going to spend as much as they can without losing a first round pick, since that's what they've done every year since the new rules came in.

 

That's not entirely true either. They left close to 300K on the table in 2013. Not saying I blame them, it's tough to know who's going to be out there for you, and to nail the number you can get each of your draftees signed for.

 

i wonder how much of that was earmarked for daniel poncedeleon.

Posted
[tweet]
[/tweet]

 

I really hope that Dewees can play CF up the ladder. The idea of him in LF is very unappetizing. He's not going to RF on a 35 arm, that's for sure.

 

Has anyone ever developed a stronger OF arm through working on form? Mind you I'm not talking about going from 35 to 60; just maybe 35 to 40.

 

According to Diamond Mines, the first scouting report on Larry Walker listed him as a 4/8 for arm strength, with a future potential of a 5/8. I think history has shown that to be drastically incorrect.

Guest
Guests
Posted
[tweet]
[/tweet]

 

I really hope that Dewees can play CF up the ladder. The idea of him in LF is very unappetizing. He's not going to RF on a 35 arm, that's for sure.

 

Has anyone ever developed a stronger OF arm through working on form? Mind you I'm not talking about going from 35 to 60; just maybe 35 to 40.

 

According to Diamond Mines, the first scouting report on Larry Walker listed him as a 4/8 for arm strength, with a future potential of a 5/8. I think history has shown that to be drastically incorrect.

Welcome!

Posted
"Cubs go with 3B Matt Rose in the 11th round. I guess they're really unhappy with Bryant's defense." -Harold Reynolds, probably
Old-Timey Member
Posted
"Cubs go with 3B Matt Rose in the 11th round. I guess they're really unhappy with Bryant's defense." -Harold Reynolds, probably

 

Bryant can't play forever.

Guest
Guests
Posted

 

At least Pawelek had upside at one point.

Are you suggesting Happ doesn't?

 

I was referring to Hayden Simpson. I posted the 2010 draft as an example of a poop draft, Raisin posted 2005.

 

Happ was my top choice this year (of guys who would reasonably be available at 9).

Gotcha

Posted
Cubs drafting some Indiana University buddies of Schwarber's. RHP's Jake Kelzer and Scott Effross. Kelzer is 6-7, was also in the IU swim team.
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Cubs haven't signed an overslot guy after round 13 in any of the previous three drafts. Unless Wilson ends up not signing for some reason, I doubt that will change this year either.

 

I think their $$$ was basically invested after round 4 with Wilson. Hopefully Berg or some $100-slot guy emerges eventually as a big-league contributor.

 

Good scouting, development, and luck can sometimes get a guy for $0.1 or less. But I think this was pretty much a 4-round draft. Hopefully some of the four $$ guys work out.

Posted

With the way all these intriguing prep guys are dropping, it's fairly clear that signability was a factor. Looking at it with the knowledge that these guys aren't likely to sign ... this draft was ridiculously thin. It'll likely still turn out quality players, but man, it was thin.

 

Every once in awhile, a depth draft is needed. I imagine this draft will probably fill some holes in the system and provide some useful system pieces, and maybe a couple guys that reach the majors.

Guest
Guests
Posted
That's a whole bunch of college kids
Posted
Don't mind the strategy going college picks and guys that could move faster and may be a little safer but have lower ceilings, I guess. Since our window is just opening now for long-term contention (and we already have guys up and in the minors that are/could be roster cornerstones) it will be nice to, hopefully, have some quick movers to provide MLB help as role players. If you want to look at it from a glass half full standpoint
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Finally an overslot guy - in the 26h round. Jared Padgett (Florida HS lefty) is a longshot to sign drafted that late, but the Cubs certainly should have some money and he is about a 4th-round talent. I sure hope all this extra money isn't targeted for Wilson, because I don't think he's worth it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...