Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Cubs to put in for 2014 All-Star Game


shnsajax
 Share

Recommended Posts

For the 100 year anniversary of Wrigley. I can't foresee any reason why they would not get it.

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=4608426

The AL/NL rotation currently has the AL hosting the ASG in 2014...

 

This should qualify for a special exception. To make it up to the AL we will give them the Brewers back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the 100 year anniversary of Wrigley. I can't foresee any reason why they would not get it.

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=4608426

The AL/NL rotation currently has the AL hosting the ASG in 2014...

 

This should qualify for a special exception. To make it up to the AL we will give them the Brewers back.

Screw the AL over twice? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the 100 year anniversary of Wrigley. I can't foresee any reason why they would not get it.

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=4608426

The AL/NL rotation currently has the AL hosting the ASG in 2014...

 

This should qualify for a special exception. To make it up to the AL we will give them the Brewers back.

Screw the AL over twice? :)

 

It should be more than that for letting them have the stupid "DH".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've read online, the competition for 2014 is the new Twins stadium. But I can't see MLB not giving the game to Wrigley since they gave it to Fenway to celebrate its 100th and to Yankee Stadium to celebrate its closing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the 100 year anniversary of Wrigley. I can't foresee any reason why they would not get it.

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=4608426

The AL/NL rotation currently has the AL hosting the ASG in 2014...

 

They doubled up the NL a few years back cause the NL was opening new taxpayer funded stadiums faster than the AL was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
From what I've read online, the competition for 2014 is the new Twins stadium. But I can't see MLB not giving the game to Wrigley since they gave it to Fenway to celebrate its 100th and to Yankee Stadium to celebrate its closing.

 

The ASG in Fenway was in 1999...not the 100th anniversary. And when they gave that game to Boston, it had been 38 years in between All Star games at Fenway. It was 31 years in between ASGs at Yankee Stadium when they had it last year. It will only have been 24 years in between ASGs for Wrigley.

 

I hope they get it, but I'm not holding my breath. If Ricketts/Kenny can sell Selig on this "Wrigley 2014" project with the ASG being the centerpiece/showcase for the plan, maybe they'd have a decent shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selig is a douche.

 

I'm sure the spirit of competitive balance is what is keeping him from making that decision. It didn't seem to bother him in 2006 and 2007 when the game was played in NL parks.

 

He should really think about what he says before he says it because his statement is a walking contradiction. And seriously, he's worried about HFA for the All Star game? Who cares. I know it "counts", but no small/mid market team is planning it's rebuilding plan around a year when their league has HFA for the All Star game so they have a .00000001% better chance of getting an extra World Series game at their stadium. With interleague play, everyone has pretty much played in every ballpark so is there really an advantage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really care if the Cubs get it or not, but the Cubs last hosted an All-Star game in 1990. The Cardinals hosted in 2009 for the first time since 1966. Yankee Stadium hosted in 2008, for the first time since 1977.

 

The Last time each team has hosted an All-Star Game

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_All-Star_Game_venues#Ballparks_that_have_hosted_more_than_one_All-Star_Game

 

I'm not saying you guys shouldn't get the All-Star game, but unless the owners plan to build a new stadium (like Steinbrenner did), the Cubs may not jump ahead of anybody.

 

Teams that have waited the longest

# New York Mets, 1964

# Kansas City Royals, 1973

# Los Angeles Dodgers, 1980

# Washington Nationals, 1982 (as Montreal Expos – the last All-Star Game held in Washington, DC was in 1969, hosted by the present-day Texas Rangers franchise)

# Minnesota Twins, 1985

# Oakland Athletics, 1987

# Cincinnati Reds, 1988

# Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, 1989 (scheduled to host in 2010)

# Chicago Cubs, 1990

 

And Chicago is second in number of All-Star games hosted all time. And the White Sox hosted the All-Star game in 2003. The Mets are hosting it in 2013.

http://www.nj.com/mets/index.ssf/2009/07/new_york_mets_citi_field_to_ho.html

And the Royals in 2012

http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/1439/k-c-set-to-host-2012-all-star-game

 

That leaves the Dodgers, Nationals, Twins, A's, Reds, and Angels ahead of you (as far as when they last hosted the All-Star Game). 2014 will probably be an AL year anyway. And the Twins have bid for 2014.

http://twincities.bizjournals.com/twincities/stories/2008/09/08/daily27.html

 

I'd say let go of the idea for 2014 because a) the Twins are opening a new ballpark and b) it will be an AL year, unless the Cubs do something drastic (like plan to build a new stadium.

 

I'm just saying, I wouldn't print the All-Star game tickets yet. There's a few teams that could be ahead of the Cubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really care if the Cubs get it or not *long post full of reasons the Cubs shouldn't get the All Star game*

 

How about the Cubs should get the All Star game because Chicago is the greatest city ever? There, that's reason enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selig is a douche.

 

I'm sure the spirit of competitive balance is what is keeping him from making that decision. It didn't seem to bother him in 2006 and 2007 when the game was played in NL parks.

Is it really too much to ask for the commissioner of the league to realize that one league has two more teams than the other? I can understand fans not grasping this, but the supposed leader of MLB should know this by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...