Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Thinking the org feels like the raw material they're optimizing for is bat control, and they can help squeeze some better outcomes through mechanics and swing decisions better than they can keep guys on barrel(especially against MLB stuff and gameplans).

  • Like 2
  • Replies 226
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

North Side Contributor
Posted

I kind of wonder if the Cubs were in a rock and a hard place. If, for example, you wanted to take Young and Flemming and they went back-to-back, Kepley is likely a slot-value high floor type, and you can re-assess into the third to find the higher ceiling prospect you were coveting at the 2nd. 

Kepley almost feels like a "fall back" plan.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
6 minutes ago, Hrubes20 said:

So…….Jack Bauer?

Still on the board. Teams probably skittish about a HS arm that gained so much velocity in one year, the injury risk there skyrockets. Also, he was used mostly sparingly this season, and any time he went more than an inning, subsequent innings he'd sit low to mid 90s. He's a high risk high ceiling pick.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I could be convinced on Conrad pretty easily, but I just don't see it on Kepley. Excellent defense but a poor arm, excellent speed but little to no power.  I mean this is like a Nick Madrigal type ceiling unless there's something that's missing.

He has way more speed and we'll have more value defensively than Madrigal, plus Kepley actually walks it seems, but the no pop seems to track.

Posted

I have a hard time bagging on drafts. I'm sure I could turn the clock back to threads from the last 20 years where I was praying the Cubs wouldn't take future HOFers and hoping beyond hope they'd take guys who flamed out in AA.

Except Hayden Simpson. horsefeathers that pick.

  • Like 2
Old-Timey Member
Posted
5 minutes ago, Outshined_One said:

I have a hard time bagging on drafts. I'm sure I could turn the clock back to threads from the last 20 years where I was praying the Cubs wouldn't take future HOFers and hoping beyond hope they'd take guys who flamed out in AA.

Except Hayden Simpson. horsefeathers that pick.

Yeah, MLB drafts especially are hard to project and hard to analyze until basically 5 years later and depend a lot on organizational development. 

Posted

So. I like these picks in a vacuum. If you told me the Cubs took these three guys individually, I'd be okay with each one. Conrad, Kepler, and Reid all make sense as Cubs picks.

But, together? It doesn't look fantastic on paper.

North Side Contributor
Posted

I'll go back to my idea that Kepler was the fallback. Reid is underslot. I think this is a "regroup, work the phones, big guys come tomorrow" type of a deal.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Like Reid physically- 6'3, 201  lbs and athletic. Very projectable... Also like this from MLB:

"Reid does a nice job of moving his running fastball around the strike zone, working at 91-94 mph and reaching 96 with the ability to get carry at the letters or sink at the knees. He throws his best pitch, an 82-84 mph changeup with fade and sink, nearly as much as his heater and will double and triple up on it, even against right-handers. He led all NCAA Division I pitchers with 66 strikeouts via the cambo."

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

I'll go back to my idea that Kepler was the fallback. Reid is underslot. I think this is a "regroup, work the phones, big guys come tomorrow" type of a deal.

I agree, this is about the Big Picture, but in the moment, it's disappointing.

  • Like 2
Old-Timey Member
Posted

 

Cubs are pretty good at coaxing out velo.  Get Reid living more up towards the top end of his current range and he's probably very suddenly a guy.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
15 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

Zumach thinks Reid compares favorably to Bremner, FWIW

That's good, but the FB isn't the same. I can the Cubs thinking they can get his FB up (he's very projectable and the Cubs have had success increasing velocity), but as of today they have different FBs.

Posted

There's definitely some slot savings from Conrad and Reid. Maybe Kepley too. Maybe they've saved $1-$1.4 million today to spread out tomorrow.

Wonder if the Cubs cash in some of that overslot money in the 4th round tomorrow after making some calls tonight. And then another push in the 11th round when the loss of pool space risk drops off. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...