Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Community Moderator
Posted
I think we're going to look back and be really pissed off they beat Houston.

 

I'm mostly worried about the teams that will want a QB. Granted, everyone in the top 5-10 probably has to consider taking a QB. But IDK if Houston would or not, since Mills isn't terrible. But ideally, the Bears would be a prime trade up target to a team wanting a QB. Or if the QB needy teams are worse, let them take a QB and let guys like Will Anderson fall (and yes, I do take an elite prospect DE over a non-elite WR prospect).

 

Carolina probably finishes pretty close to the top. Right now, Pittsburgh, Vegas, Arizona, Philly (Saints pick), Jags, and maybe Houston (x2- own & Browns pick) are ahead of the Bears of the teams who likely won't take QB. Losing to Detroit a couple times will probably be most important if high pick is the biggest goal.

  • Replies 434
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I used to be all on team 'tank for better picks' but right now we're talking about the difference of 5 or 6 draft spots....which shouldn't be a make or break for putting together a roster. The team is gonna have a top 10 pick regardless.

 

I care less about where they pick than having confidence they know where they're weak on the roster and what talent can help them. And I'm not feeling....overly confident right now.

Posted
I used to be all on team 'tank for better picks' but right now we're talking about the difference of 5 or 6 draft spots....which shouldn't be a make or break for putting together a roster. The team is gonna have a top 10 pick regardless.

 

I care less about where they pick than having confidence they know where they're weak on the roster and what talent can help them. And I'm not feeling....overly confident right now.

I hate tanking myself, in almost every circumstance, but it's the route Poles took, so I hope they at least execute it well. Them being pitiful but losing out on a top pick due to a SOS tie breaker would be the worst of both worlds.

Posted

I mean how many more games will the Bears win this season? 2-3? 4-13 will get them a top 5 pick at worst, 5-12 should get them in the 6-8 range.

 

Split with the Lions and maybe beat the Falcons. Don't beat a resting Vikings squad that probably will have their #2 or #3 seed locked up.

Community Moderator
Posted
I used to be all on team 'tank for better picks' but right now we're talking about the difference of 5 or 6 draft spots....which shouldn't be a make or break for putting together a roster. The team is gonna have a top 10 pick regardless.

 

I care less about where they pick than having confidence they know where they're weak on the roster and what talent can help them. And I'm not feeling....overly confident right now.

 

Yeah, as much as I'd love to finish with the #2 pick and trade down for multiple firsts to just load this team up with high level talent, ultimately the best thing for this franchise would be for Fields to stay healthy and figure a bunch of things out this year and for them to win some games. The Bears have been in all but 1 game and were a questionable non-TD call away from being in that one. They probably aren't going to be wiped off the field in any game other than Philly and Buffalo. And they won't lose all the games they'll play close.

 

I do have confidence that Poles will attack where they are weak on the roster and add to them. Based on who he's worked under and how KC has done things in recent years, I'd imagine they'll hit OL and WR pretty hard this offseason.

Posted
I mean how many more games will the Bears win this season? 2-3? 4-13 will get them a top 5 pick at worst, 5-12 should get them in the 6-8 range.

 

Split with the Lions and maybe beat the Falcons. Don't beat a resting Vikings squad that probably will have their #2 or #3 seed locked up.

 

Every year bad teams accidentally beat good teams. The Jets are famous for killing their draft positioning by winning games they shouldn't. The 3-14 Jags beat the Bills last year. As long as Eberflus keeps the players bought in and playing hard, I bet they'll surprise at least 1 team that should beat us this year. And I think he will have them playing hard considering how much of the roster is fringe NFL players and guys on 1 year contracts.

 

5-12 sounds about right to me.

Posted

This is pretty unscientific, but if every team played their remaining games to the "expected W-L" record through 6, then you'd finish with Carolina and Pitt as 1-2 and then a 4 way tie with Bears, Arizona, Detroit, and Washington at 6 wins. Bears would then pick 5th under current SOS standing.

 

I think expected W-L is gonna overshoot actual on the low end. The worst teams in the league will undershot their expected W-L. Worst team isn't gonna be a 5 win team.

 

So little variances will make big jumps, but whatever in tier the Bears end at, they are gonna likely fall at the bottom due to SOS.

Posted
This is pretty unscientific, but if every team played their remaining games to the "expected W-L" record through 6, then you'd finish with Carolina and Pitt as 1-2 and then a 4 way tie with Bears, Arizona, Detroit, and Washington at 6 wins. Bears would then pick 5th under current SOS standing.

 

I think expected W-L is gonna overshoot actual on the low end. The worst teams in the league will undershot their expected W-L. Worst team isn't gonna be a 5 win team.

 

So little variances will make big jumps, but whatever in tier the Bears end at, they are gonna likely fall at the bottom due to SOS.

 

FWIW, Football Outsiders has the Bears currently with the 4th highest odds of getting the #1 pick, but the 2nd highest odds of getting a Top 5 pick. So yeah I think to your point the tiebreakers at this point don't look to be doing the Bears any favors.

Posted
This is pretty unscientific, but if every team played their remaining games to the "expected W-L" record through 6, then you'd finish with Carolina and Pitt as 1-2 and then a 4 way tie with Bears, Arizona, Detroit, and Washington at 6 wins. Bears would then pick 5th under current SOS standing.

 

I think expected W-L is gonna overshoot actual on the low end. The worst teams in the league will undershot their expected W-L. Worst team isn't gonna be a 5 win team.

 

So little variances will make big jumps, but whatever in tier the Bears end at, they are gonna likely fall at the bottom due to SOS.

 

FWIW, Football Outsiders has the Bears currently with the 4th highest odds of getting the #1 pick, but the 2nd highest odds of getting a Top 5 pick. So yeah I think to your point the tiebreakers at this point don't look to be doing the Bears any favors.

I won't survive Bears Twitter from Jan to April if the Bears get the number one pick lol. Even top 2 I may need to delete my account.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...