Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Asked this the other day in a game thread but curious to see if there are any signs of Seiya making adjustments and/or is he still mostly doing the things that he does well during this slump?

 

Looking at my arbitrary sample size machine, Seiya has a line of .204/.257/.327/.584 over his last 26 games (105 PA), 0 HR, 34.3% K%, 6.7% BB%. Alarmingly, despite the .204 BA his BABIP over that time is .326. 105 PA is a lot but still not a large enough number to draw any permanent conclusions for a guy in his first 2 months in the MLB I guess. Just want to understand if he's showing positive signs outside of the raw numbers or if he's veering into Fukudome territory and will settle in as a .750s OPS hitter (or the equivalent in 2022 baseball)

Posted
Asked this the other day in a game thread but curious to see if there are any signs of Seiya making adjustments and/or is he still mostly doing the things that he does well during this slump?

 

Looking at my arbitrary sample size machine, Seiya has a line of .204/.257/.327/.584 over his last 26 games (105 PA), 0 HR, 34.3% K%, 6.7% BB%. Alarmingly, despite the .204 BA his BABIP over that time is .326. 105 PA is a lot but still not a large enough number to draw any permanent conclusions for a guy in his first 2 months in the MLB I guess. Just want to understand if he's showing positive signs outside of the raw numbers or if he's veering into Fukudome territory and will settle in as a .750s OPS hitter (or the equivalent in 2022 baseball)

 

 

Without getting too in the weeds on his peripherals(partially because I'm lazy, and partially because I hate small sample over-interpretations of stuff like plate discipline data), I think this tells a compelling story of Seiya crushing the ball for 2-3 weeks, pitchers adjusting and him cratering for 2-3 weeks, and now him adjusting back and hitting around his season line for 2ish weeks.

 

608a2aa82be48ca7e447ce85e6d3620c.png

 

I don't think that current equilibrium is necessarily his long term expectation, but it does help tell the tale with more nuance then him simply being good then bad.

Posted
I can’t find the tweet(s) but his chase rates are pretty good and he’s not just hacking and he’s also had some of the most balls called for strikes of any player in the league. We knew there was going to be an adjustment and him likely sucking for some sort of stretch but he’s been a little unlucky with some of the ball/strike stuff and the K% is a little over inflated.
Old-Timey Member
Posted

I don't know if anywhere has % of called strikes 3's, but I'd guess Seiya's at or damn near the top of the league. Many of them horsefeathers, but also many of them legit. Like the horsefeathers Reds starter on Monday got him bad in the first PA of the game.

 

But Seiya's contact rate is fine (53rd percentile), his contact quality is great (78th percentile for xwOBA on contact) and his eye is very good (92nd percentile in charge rate). So I think any approach issues, e.g. being too passive in 2-strike counts, is just part of the adjustment process. Just like you need at least a full season to consider that a pitcher is true talent better/worse than their FIP, you should probably do the same with hitters.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
It doesn't make any sense. You'd think if anything a player with Suzuki's reputation would be drawing blown called balls, not strikes.
Posted
I wonder where Schwarber is at in that. I feel like when Schwarber was on the Cubs that he gets a lot of blown calls on balls/strikes like Suzuki is so far this year. Am I remember that correctly? Seems like he got it worse than like Bryant, Rizzo, etc.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
I wonder where Schwarber is at in that. I feel like when Schwarber was on the Cubs that he gets a lot of blown calls on balls/strikes like Suzuki is so far this year. Am I remember that correctly? Seems like he got it worse than like Bryant, Rizzo, etc.

He probably did get some of that. I know I remember Jorge Soler was consistently hosed on those. It got to the point where "a Soler strike" was a pretty common term on this board.

Posted
That montage should one of the best arguments for robot umps; almost all of them are clearly the ump being duped by the catcher moving the glove back into or close enough to the zone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...