Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

The number being floated around for the Marlins projected target payroll is about 75MM. I'm sure they'd like to keep a couple of good players, at least.

 

why would they do that? They suck balls and have no money. They'd be much better off ripping off the bandaid and losing every game for two years to stock up on prospects and high draft picks and slowly start to build a real team. There's value in an expansion or newly moved team to actually try to win some games and garner support from the new fans, but Miami has been here for 3 decades now and they are what they are, an afterthought. Why spend $75m to win 70 when you can spend $30m to win 68?

  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
So the Cardinals are probably not getting Stanton, and it honestly has to sting that a top player doesn't want to go there.

 

It's not just Stanton, but Price, Heyward, Ohtani (not that the Cards showed a ton of interest in Ohtani, but he did eliminate them right off the bat), etc.

 

The reputation of STL as a "baseball heaven" where virtually all players would like to be has taken a pretty sound thrashing over the past few seasons. The gripe among Cards fans was that DeWitt wouldn't spend the money. Now it appears players don't want it even when it is offered.

Posted

The number being floated around for the Marlins projected target payroll is about 75MM. I'm sure they'd like to keep a couple of good players, at least.

 

why would they do that? They suck balls and have no money. They'd be much better off ripping off the bandaid and losing every game for two years to stock up on prospects and high draft picks and slowly start to build a real team. There's value in an expansion or newly moved team to actually try to win some games and garner support from the new fans, but Miami has been here for 3 decades now and they are what they are, an afterthought. Why spend $75m to win 70 when you can spend $30m to win 68?

 

It doesn't make sense to me, either. Of course they'd be better off tanking. But that rumor was making the rounds.

 

Maybe the thought process is like some here had in the early stages of our rebuild, where they preferred the futile pretense of "trying" half-assedly rather than tanking full on.

Posted
So the Cardinals are probably not getting Stanton, and it honestly has to sting that a top player doesn't want to go there.

 

It's not just Stanton, but Price, Heyward, Ohtani (not that the Cards showed a ton of interest in Ohtani, but he did eliminate them right off the bat), etc.

 

The reputation of STL as a "baseball heaven" where virtually all players would like to be has taken a pretty sound thrashing over the past few seasons. The gripe among Cards fans was that DeWitt wouldn't spend the money. Now it appears players don't want it even when it is offered.

 

Well, certain players don't want to play there, while other, more wholesome types still probably do.

Posted
The Cardinals have really become a second rate organization

 

 

You would think with their awesome local cuisine, being a second rate organization would never happen

 

9781933370705_p0_v1_s600x595.jpg

Posted

 

Seriously, tho, if they do this, this makes them less of a threat against us for Harper right?

I would think this almost certainly would take them out of it. It just wouldn't make much sense to have $600+ million tied up in outfielders. I think they'd be more in on Machado than Harper anyways (move Turner to 1B and Bellinger to the OF for 1-2 years until Tuner is gone, move Turner to 2B or Seagar to 2B and Machado at 3B/SS).

Posted
Seriously, tho, if they do this, this makes them less of a threat against us for Harper right?

 

It's the old "bird in hand," right. At the very least, the Cubs, Nats, and Yankees will be pushing all their chips in to try to get Harper. Probably other teams as well. The Dodgers might have a 1 in 4 shot to get Harper for who knows how much money, probably something pretty similar to, if not more expensive than, Stanton's contract.

 

They know Stanton wants to play for them. They know what his contract costs. If they can convince the Marlins to take one or both of their bad contracts (Kazmir and Gonzalez) which would defer the Marlin's salary relief for a year, but would enable the Dodgers to take the entire Stanton contract. Send Gonzalez and/or Kazmir, Puig, $10-15M, and some b-list prospects and call it a deal.

Posted
Dee Gordon just went to the Mariners. No idea if Stanton gets moved soon or not. But, its going to be fun seeing how they drop payroll, if its not Stanton.
Posted (edited)
if you knew we had no chance at harper, would you want stanton?

Yes, but it would have to be some sort of super trade where we got Stanton, Yelich + bad contract (Volquez, Tazawa, Ziegler, etc.) too and they’d get like 1 of Almora or Happ, Seal Boy, Alzolay and Zagunis

Edited by Cubswin11
Posted

We don't even want the guy, but he'd approve a deal to us and he tells the Cards no, despite them begging him.

 

Their fans are going to go nuts lol.

Posted
My god, him in the line up would be sick. That contract becomes an albatross in the last 5 years ($140M - $150M). That’s a lot of jack for what could be some unproductive years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...