Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
We're just awful against small teams.

 

Illinois isnt really a small team, but they arent big, either. They have a lot of 2s and 3s.

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
We're just awful against small teams.

 

Illinois isnt really a small team, but they arent big, either. They have a lot of 2s and 3s.

 

Considering that they rarely have more than 1 guy on the floor I'd consider a true 4 or 5, yeah they're a "small" team. If not stature wise then style wise. When Hill is the 4 a majority of the time he's on the floor, you're playing small.

Posted
We're just awful against small teams.

 

Illinois isnt really a small team, but they arent big, either. They have a lot of 2s and 3s.

 

Considering that they rarely have more than 1 guy on the floor I'd consider a true 4 or 5, yeah they're a "small" team. If not stature wise then style wise. When Hill is the 4 a majority of the time he's on the floor, you're playing small.

 

eh, they don't have a real 1 or a real 5, they are a stretch team. They can play long and fast. Hill regularly brings the ball up court and initiates the offense, so he can play anywhere between 1-4.

Posted
We're just awful against small teams.

 

Illinois isnt really a small team, but they arent big, either. They have a lot of 2s and 3s.

 

Small in relation to Purdue I should say. Hammons trying to chase Finke around the perimeter. 6' 9" Swanigan trying to chase a wing around. Vince Evans trying to chase a guard around. Illinois was the first team to shoot over 50% against Purdue in 37 games. Some of that just comes down to Illinois making some shots they usually don't make (shooting almost 20% better from 3 than their season average) but a lot of it was our bigger guys not being able to defend the smaller Illinois guys.

 

Illinois was great at triple teaming our centers and our shooters couldn't make them pay, shooting 32% from three. Add in a [expletive] load of turnovers (16!) which we have a propensity for and 28 personal fouls and you get a blowout. It's the same recipe that Butler used to great effect and is the obvious blueprint for beating our size. If Painter can't adjust to smaller teams and we can't impose our will it's going to be a quick tournament run when we draw a smaller team.

Posted
Can't believe they'd keep us out of the SEC tournament this year, that really cuts to the core.
Posted
And illinois is too good not to get a tourney bid
Posted
But for reals on MSU, are they good? I haven't seen them outside of the 2 games with Iowa.

 

They are really good but I don't think Valentine is 100% yet and they clearly aren't the same team without him at his best.

 

All that said, Iowa looks really good and I am not looking forward to the potential ass kicking in Iowa City tomorrow with or without Levert.

Posted

kenpom attempts to quantify home-court advantage

http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/tiers_of_joy

It turns out those adjustments are important. Beating the 90th-ranked team on the road is about as difficult as beating the 50th-best team on a neutral floor, which is roughly as difficult as beating the 20th-best team on one’s home floor. (The exact relationship can vary by season.) So it’s poor form to ignore this when some teams in college never go on the road in non-conference and others rarely get to play a non-conference game at home.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...