Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Mooney says the team is looking into John Axford, presumably as the nominal closer: http://www.csnchicago.com/cubs/cubs-looking-axford-search-potential-closer

 

Axford is interesting. His K rate has declined a bit from his glory years in Milwaukee, but so has his walk rate, and his velocity is still pretty great. From a superficial look, it seems like he's had some extreme swings in HR rate that have led him to either be dominant(early Milwaukee, St. Louis) or downright bad(late Milwaukee). If he can settle his HR/FB rate somewhere between the 4% and 18% extremes, he'd be a very good candidate for a couple million bucks.

Recommended Posts

Posted
Mooney says the team is looking into John Axford, presumably as the nominal closer: http://www.csnchicago.com/cubs/cubs-looking-axford-search-potential-closer

 

Axford is interesting. His K rate has declined a bit from his glory years in Milwaukee, but so has his walk rate, and his velocity is still pretty great. From a superficial look, it seems like he's had some extreme swings in HR rate that have led him to either be dominant(early Milwaukee, St. Louis) or downright bad(late Milwaukee). If he can settle his HR/FB rate somewhere between the 4% and 18% extremes, he'd be a very good candidate for a couple million bucks.

 

His swinging strike percentage last year was actually the highest its been since 2010. I wouldn't be shocked at all to see the strikeout rate climb back up a bit.

 

On the negative side of things, his first pitch strike percentage last year was his lowest of his career. So I'm not sure the improved walk rate isn't a mirage.

Posted
Both of those ticked up a good bit in his brief time in St. Louis, so hopefully they found something or Milwaukee was holding him back from making those improvements.
Posted
@FeinsandNYDN Source: Cubs and Royals are among the suitors for Joba Chamberlain. Doesn't sound like anything is imminent with either, however.

 

Joba's an interesting acquisition, but I just don't see how he fits with what the Cubs are trying to do this offseason.

Posted
@FeinsandNYDN Source: Cubs and Royals are among the suitors for Joba Chamberlain. Doesn't sound like anything is imminent with either, however.

 

Joba's an interesting acquisition, but I just don't see how he fits with what the Cubs are trying to do this offseason.

 

How so? Because he's not team controlled?

 

I thought one thing they'd do is aggressively restock the bullpen and try to improve by not being horrible at the back end. I think he fits.

Posted
@FeinsandNYDN Source: Cubs and Royals are among the suitors for Joba Chamberlain. Doesn't sound like anything is imminent with either, however.

 

Joba's an interesting acquisition, but I just don't see how he fits with what the Cubs are trying to do this offseason.

 

How so? Because he's not team controlled?

 

I thought one thing they'd do is aggressively restock the bullpen and try to improve by not being horrible at the back end. I think he fits.

 

Because he's neither very cheap nor reasonably certain to be an effective reliever. I'm cool with them taking on castoffs that might have a shot to improve upon past performance, and I'm cool with paying a couple million bucks to get a decent reliever to stabilize the pen. But unless the payroll is going to be a good bit higher than it was last year, I'm not a huge fan of paying the money for a guy without the "certainty" that he'll be any good.

Posted

Seems like the bullpen is where they're going to spin vets off this year. I like it considering we have a good young group of back-end guys to slide into those roles.

 

Not a fan of Joba, however.

Posted

Consolidating a bit here:

 

@GDubCub Cubs looking at reliever trade market. Eyeing Nats' Storen, Clippard among others.

 

@AdamKilgore The Cubs have interest in Drew Storen to fill open closer role, source said. Nats would listen. Schierholtz, Russell are pieces that fit.

 

Storen would do very nicely as the nominal closer who's also a good reliever. I get why he's expendable in a pen that has Soriano, Stammen, and Clippard, but I'm not sure I get the Cubs angle. Russell makes a bit of sense since they're light on LH RP, but Russell for Storen as principals doesn't make sense. Schierholtz I guess would be a 4th OF, but they aren't platooning Werth and Span & Harper are LH, so there aren't a ton of ABs out there for him.

Posted
Either this is overkill, or the Cubs aren't as sold on the Cabrera/Grimm/Rosscup/Ramirez/whomever else tier of guys that would seem to need jobs in the pen.

 

My best guess is that they believe in those guys as much as we do(at least in the aggregate), but that they have less faith in Strop/Parker being all that different from them compared to us.

Posted
@AdamKilgoreWP Seems as though talks btw Nats & Cubs about Clippard and Storen never went anywhere. Told that one is dead.
Posted
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/chi-chicago-cubs-closer-role-20131210,0,1403833.story

 

Sounds like even signing a closer is too expensive for the poor Cubs.

 

Respect your opinion, but I didn't come away from that story thinking that.

If they are even considering a closer by committee approach for next year, that just tells me they don't want to spend money on a closer. B/c they are spending so much money on the roster elsewhere? Just tired of the lack of improvement to the big league roster.

Posted
I can understand that, but why spend BIG money on a guy that's not likely to get enough chances to make a real difference anyway. I'd prefer to create a closer or to sign a cheaper type, like an Axford anyway. At any rate, I expect us to go into the year with a clear 9th inning guy and it won't be Strop or anyone else currently on the roster.
Posted
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/chi-chicago-cubs-closer-role-20131210,0,1403833.story

 

Sounds like even signing a closer is too expensive for the poor Cubs.

 

Respect your opinion, but I didn't come away from that story thinking that.

If they are even considering a closer by committee approach for next year, that just tells me they don't want to spend money on a closer. B/c they are spending so much money on the roster elsewhere? Just tired of the lack of improvement to the big league roster.

 

They shouldn't be doing what you're suggesting even if they had gobs of money to spend.

 

Overpaying for a guy with the closer label (be it money or assets) is the type of dumb thing we should be happy won't be happening anymore.

Posted
I know it will be a lost season, but lets not make it worse by letting the bullpen blow every save in games we're actually winning. And I wouldnt expect them to throw gobs of money to sign someone. Is there any FA that could be signed for a one year deal? Balfour, Rodney, Benoit, or Veras? I would rather start with a known than watch them play musical chairs with the closer role.
Posted
They're going to do that, the only thing that's been more telegraphed is that Samardzija is getting traded. That's why you've seen rumors for a half dozen or more reliever options they're looking to choose from. You're overreacting from Renteria talking up the existing players in response to a specific question.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...