Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
count me as one who absolutely doesn't want to play green bay in the playoffs. go giants.

Would we play the Giants then?

 

It's crucial that we don't. We can't block them.

 

No doubt the Giants pass rush is by far the best that we could face, but I think our O-line and our gameplan is much much better since we played them. Plus I'd guess the Giants would come into that game overconfident that they are going to sack the [expletive] out of Cutler all game. It's human nature to believe that.

  • Replies 775
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
count me as one who absolutely doesn't want to play green bay in the playoffs. go giants.

Would we play the Giants then?

 

It's crucial that we don't. We can't block them.

 

i don't see a repeat of that game at all. we're a different offense than we were then. i'll take on the giants again.

I don't think we are. Giants really bring it - more than others.

Posted
Can one of you explain to me why Soldier Field's turf is so much worse than Lambeau's? Not trying to be an [expletive], just curious.

 

because the parks department is [expletive] with the team.

 

that's not a problem in GB because the city is the team and if you have problem with the parks department, just go down the hallway and smack old ron, john, or duane right upside the head or take a wiz on their mower.

Posted
Can one of you explain to me why Soldier Field's turf is so much worse than Lambeau's? Not trying to be an [expletive], just curious.

 

because the parks department is [expletive] with the team.

 

that's not a problem in GB because the city is the team and if you have problem with the parks department, just go down the hallway and smack old ron, john, or duane right upside the head or take a wiz on their mower.

 

You never cease to entertain me Sulley.

Posted
Someone will have to confirm this but I believe that if the Packers win this game, the Bears cannot play the Giants in the first round.
Posted
And some of you wanted the Bears to just ignore Revis' side of the field.
Posted
Someone will have to confirm this but I believe that if the Packers win this game, the Bears cannot play the Giants in the first round.

 

 

No. If the Saints lose tomorrow and next week, Eagles win their next two, and the Bears lose to the Pack, it ends up

 

1. Falcons

2. Eagles

3. Bears

4. Who cares

5. Pack

6. Giants

 

 

If the Giants lose today, and the Eagles lose on Tuesday, the Bears clinch the 2 seed.

Posted
Someone will have to confirm this but I believe that if the Packers win this game, the Bears cannot play the Giants in the first round.

 

 

No. If the Saints lose tomorrow and next week, Eagles win their next two, and the Bears lose to the Pack, it ends up

 

1. Falcons

2. Eagles

3. Bears

4. Who cares

5. Pack

6. Giants

 

Forgot about the Saints. I was looking at it as Bears win they are the 2 seed. Bears lose the Packers are in the playoffs as the 6 seed. It's a legit possibility too with the Saints last 2 games. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

If the Giants lose today, and the Eagles lose on Tuesday, the Bears clinch the 2 seed.

Posted

We're going to be playing GB in the WC round. I don't see anyway we beat GB in Lambeau next week, meaning we can only avoid GB if Philly loses one of their two games or if the Saints lose both of their remaining games. Neither of those will happen.

 

The only thing that is making me feel better is that GB will most likely have to beat us twice to advance to the divisonal round, and that is tough for any team to do.

 

But they will because that stuff happens to Sulley's teams.

Posted
That was the best quarter by a Bear QB I have ever seen. That's why the Bears traded for Cutler. Were any of the TDs against Revis?

 

And to think people were still calling into the post game show bitching about that one Cutler interception.

Posted

1) We could beat the Packers if we have something to play for.

2) Philly could easily lose to Dallas coming off a short week and with the Cowboys having extra rest

3) New Orleans could conceivably lose to Atlanta (likely) and Tampa (remote, not impossible)

Posted
We're going to be playing GB in the WC round. I don't see anyway we beat GB in Lambeau next week, meaning we can only avoid GB if Philly loses one of their two games or if the Saints lose both of their remaining games. Neither of those will happen.

 

The only thing that is making me feel better is that GB will most likely have to beat us twice to advance to the divisonal round, and that is tough for any team to do.

 

But they will because that stuff happens to Sulley's teams.

 

 

wtf? why?

Posted
1) We could beat the Packers if we have something to play for.

2) Philly could easily lose to Dallas coming off a short week and with the Cowboys having extra rest

3) New Orleans could conceivably lose to Atlanta (likely) and Tampa (remote, not impossible)

 

#2 seemed a lot more likely before Kitna went down. Some guy named Stephen McGee will not lead Dallas to a road win in Philly, although I'll admit he didn't look too bad last night.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...