Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Ok, so all of Dempster's 5 runs were unearned today. I want to know how that's possible since he gave up a home run to Dunn. Maybe he's not responsible for the baserunner that was on during the home run, but it's ridiculous that he isn't responsible for the ball traveling approximately 500 feet. I don't see how that can be justified, even if it happened after what was supposed to be the 3rd out.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Ok, so all of Dempster's 5 runs were unearned today. I want to know how that's possible since he gave up a home run to Dunn. Maybe he's not responsible for the baserunner that was on during the home run, but it's ridiculous that he isn't responsible for the ball traveling approximately 500 feet. I don't see how that can be justified, even if it happened after what was supposed to be the 3rd out.

God am I glad I didn't get this game on tv today

Posted
I don't remember what game I was watching, but this exact scenario came up with the 2 out HR after the error, and the pitcher was charged with an earned run for the HR. I thought they changed the rule to count HRs as earned no matter what.
Posted
Because the inning should have been over.

 

Keep in mind though that if a reliever came in and gave up a home run in that situation, the run would be earned to the relief pitcher and unearned to the team.

Community Moderator
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

Community Moderator
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

Why should he get off scott free? He still gave up the tater.

Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

Why should he get off scott free? He still gave up the tater.

 

He also did what he needed to do to get out of the inning, and the defense let him down.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

right, it's a team game, and the team lost because Dempster coughed up a 2 mile bomb to Dunn. but according to his ERA, he was totally awesome, so we get to win the game, right?

Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

right, it's a team game, and the team lost because Dempster coughed up a 2 mile bomb to Dunn. but according to his ERA, he was totally awesome, so we get to win the game, right?

 

The team lost because the defense, baserunning, and the offense let us down. Dempster wasn't bad last night.

Edited by C.C.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

right, it's a team game, and the team lost because Dempster coughed up a 2 mile bomb to Dunn. but according to his ERA, he was totally awesome, so we get to win the game, right?

what does winning the game have to do with with this discussion?

 

NOTHING

 

Community Moderator
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

Why should he get off scott free? He still gave up the tater.

 

He also did what he needed to do to get out of the inning, and the defense let him down.

 

I'm not asking that unearned runs go away, but I just don't see a homer as unearned. Count the runner that got on because of there error unearned, fine, but Dunn should've been earned IMO.

 

How many times do guys save pitchers earned runs with spectacular plays on balls that should have been hits? You don't see them saying "Well that SHOULD have been a run scoring triple, but so and so just made a great diving catch, but we'll count it on my ERA because it SHOULD have fallen in."

Old-Timey Member
Posted
But ERA is the only stat that it doesn't reflect upon. He still got the loss, which most people in baseball value over ERA, and his other stats remain effected by the "unearned" HR. I don't think it's that big of a deal one way or the other.
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

Why should he get off scott free? He still gave up the tater.

 

He also did what he needed to do to get out of the inning, and the defense let him down.

 

I'm not asking that unearned runs go away, but I just don't see a homer as unearned. Count the runner that got on because of there error unearned, fine, but Dunn should've been earned IMO.

 

How many times do guys save pitchers earned runs with spectacular plays on balls that should have been hits? You don't see them saying "Well that SHOULD have been a run scoring triple, but so and so just made a great diving catch, but we'll count it on my ERA because it SHOULD have fallen in."

 

There are also times where a pitcher induces a ground ball for a double play to get out of an inning, the defense only manages to get one out instead of two without an error being charged, and an earned run ends up scoring either on that play or soon after. It tends to balance out.

Posted (edited)
Let's not forget that Dempster did get the loss. It is called EARNED run average for a reason. If he didn't earn the run by pitching badly, he shouldn't be held responsible. Edited by Wilson A2000
Old-Timey Member
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

because theoretically, wouldn't he just give up that home run the next inning?

Community Moderator
Posted
Let's not forget that Dempster did get the loss. It is called EARNED run average for a reason. If he didn't earn the run by pitching badly, he shouldn't be held responsible.

 

But he did. He threw a meatball to Dunn.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Let's not forget that Dempster did get the loss. It is called EARNED run average for a reason. If he didn't earn the run by pitching badly, he shouldn't be held responsible.

 

But he did. He threw a meatball to Dunn.

That was a meatball too. Man Dun hit that ball far.

Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

 

I thought the runner was offsides and the home run should have been called back.

Posted
But ERA is the only stat that it doesn't reflect upon. He still got the loss, which most people in baseball value over ERA, and his other stats remain effected by the "unearned" HR. I don't think it's that big of a deal one way or the other.

 

Yepper. It's an oddity, but that's about all it is. This doesn't mean ERA is meaningless, it means it doesn't tell you everything. But there's plenty of other things to tell you how a guy pitched. Not that big of a deal.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
why not spread this idea to other sports? i think football should have unearned interceptions when the ball hits a guy in the chest and bounces to the defender or is tipped at the line of scrimmage
Posted
I'm glad someone started this thread, because I thought this rule was pretty ridiculous. Calling a homer unearned is just dumb...no matter what happen prior to it.

I don't think so. Baseball is a team game unless the pitcher strikes out 27 guys and gives up no hits. If a player makes an error in the field (non pitcher) and the next guy comes up and hits a tater why should the pitcher bear the brunt?

 

right, it's a team game, and the team lost because Dempster coughed up a 2 mile bomb to Dunn. but according to his ERA, he was totally awesome, so we get to win the game, right?

 

Dempster was totally awesome last night. He gave up 2 bombs, that's it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...