Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
im telling you it wont continue.

 

yeah you told us it wouldn't happen last year, solid forecast there

 

It's a fair statement to expect some regression from someone with a BABIP above .340. As far as whether or not he should stick as a starter, there's no doubt, even if he regresses to league avg. (around .260 EqA for 2B), he'll be miles ahead of Cedeno, Theriot, and Fontenot.

 

But not Roberts. That's the person who will push him from the starting lineup. Cedeno, Theriot or Fontenot will not start at 2B. And I don't buy that DeRosa can play an acceptable SS.

Posted
I don't know, I like DeRosa, and I do think it's possible that he will play well again next year, but I don't think it's a given. I talked to a guy that does some private hitting lessons with DeRo, he said that DeRo is really not a very good baseball player, he's just a ridiculous athlete which helps him compensate for his lack of baseball ability. If you ask me, I'd rather have a guy who is a really good "baseball player" like Roberts than an "athlete" because the ball player is most likely going to out perform and be more consistent than the athlete.

 

Roberts is a much better athlete than Derosa (minus strength).

 

Even more reason to acquire him. My point was just that all DeRosa is is a pure athlete with not much baseball ability, I mean if you ever look at his swing technicalities they are not pretty.

Posted
Roberts would push him, although the improvements would be based more on having the higher OBP at the top ahead of the better hitters moreso than Roberts replacing Derosa's bat in the lineup. Plus, the Cubs have to get him, which I typically believe when I see.
Posted

 

Even more reason to acquire him. My point was just that all DeRosa is is a pure athlete with not much baseball ability, I mean if you ever look at his swing technicalities they are not pretty.

 

He has baseball abilities, just not real toolsy (not real fast, avg. arm, ok hands)

 

I tend to brush hitting mechanics to the side, if he can center the ball and drive it, which Derosa does well.

 

I don't mind them looking @ Roberts (depending on cost) as it gives the Cubs needed depth espec. as a bat off the bench and a good player who can play mult. positions. This team will suffer injuries next year and he will have value in that role.

Posted

 

Even more reason to acquire him. My point was just that all DeRosa is is a pure athlete with not much baseball ability, I mean if you ever look at his swing technicalities they are not pretty.

 

He has baseball abilities, just not real toolsy (not real fast, avg. arm, ok hands)

 

I tend to brush hitting mechanics to the side, if he can center the ball and drive it, which Derosa does well.

 

I don't mind them looking @ Roberts (depending on cost) as it gives the Cubs needed depth espec. as a bat off the bench and a good player who can play mult. positions. This team will suffer injuries next year and he will have value in that role.

 

I'm telling you that a guy who personally does training lessons with Mark DeRosa told me that he lacks a lot of the "baseball ability" and makes up for it with his athletic ability, this is not my quote this is a guy who personally trains him, so I'd say that it's gotta be pretty accurate.

Posted

To get to the majors, you have to be somewhat athletic.

 

I don't know the context of what he means by athletic. Does he mean athletic as far as hand eye coord., balance, etc. at the plate (which is baseball ability)? Or does he mean his ability to run, throw, etc?

 

In the context of every day life, he's def. more athletic and gifted than an avg. person. As far as a major league player, his physical abilities (speed, arm strength, agility) are not superior than most especially middle infielders.

Posted

 

Even more reason to acquire him. My point was just that all DeRosa is is a pure athlete with not much baseball ability, I mean if you ever look at his swing technicalities they are not pretty.

 

He has baseball abilities, just not real toolsy (not real fast, avg. arm, ok hands)

 

I tend to brush hitting mechanics to the side, if he can center the ball and drive it, which Derosa does well.

 

I don't mind them looking @ Roberts (depending on cost) as it gives the Cubs needed depth espec. as a bat off the bench and a good player who can play mult. positions. This team will suffer injuries next year and he will have value in that role.

 

I'm telling you that a guy who personally does training lessons with Mark DeRosa told me that he lacks a lot of the "baseball ability" and makes up for it with his athletic ability, this is not my quote this is a guy who personally trains him, so I'd say that it's gotta be pretty accurate.

 

 

Just FYI, let's just say Ping knows what he's talking about, too.

Posted

 

Even more reason to acquire him. My point was just that all DeRosa is is a pure athlete with not much baseball ability, I mean if you ever look at his swing technicalities they are not pretty.

 

He has baseball abilities, just not real toolsy (not real fast, avg. arm, ok hands)

 

I tend to brush hitting mechanics to the side, if he can center the ball and drive it, which Derosa does well.

 

I don't mind them looking @ Roberts (depending on cost) as it gives the Cubs needed depth espec. as a bat off the bench and a good player who can play mult. positions. This team will suffer injuries next year and he will have value in that role.

 

I'm telling you that a guy who personally does training lessons with Mark DeRosa told me that he lacks a lot of the "baseball ability" and makes up for it with his athletic ability, this is not my quote this is a guy who personally trains him, so I'd say that it's gotta be pretty accurate.

 

Is your friend in the majors?

Posted

 

Even more reason to acquire him. My point was just that all DeRosa is is a pure athlete with not much baseball ability, I mean if you ever look at his swing technicalities they are not pretty.

 

He has baseball abilities, just not real toolsy (not real fast, avg. arm, ok hands)

 

I tend to brush hitting mechanics to the side, if he can center the ball and drive it, which Derosa does well.

 

I don't mind them looking @ Roberts (depending on cost) as it gives the Cubs needed depth espec. as a bat off the bench and a good player who can play mult. positions. This team will suffer injuries next year and he will have value in that role.

 

I'm telling you that a guy who personally does training lessons with Mark DeRosa told me that he lacks a lot of the "baseball ability" and makes up for it with his athletic ability, this is not my quote this is a guy who personally trains him, so I'd say that it's gotta be pretty accurate.

 

Is your friend in the majors?

 

He's not a friend, his company trains pro prospects and the Houston Astros scouts help run it. He does lessons with a few MLB players, including DeRo. I worked with him until i had surgery to repair my labrum which I am rehabbing from atm.

Posted
To get to the majors, you have to be somewhat athletic.

 

I don't know the context of what he means by athletic. Does he mean athletic as far as hand eye coord., balance, etc. at the plate (which is baseball ability)? Or does he mean his ability to run, throw, etc?

 

In the context of every day life, he's def. more athletic and gifted than an avg. person. As far as a major league player, his physical abilities (speed, arm strength, agility) are not superior than most especially middle infielders.

 

hmm, the best way to describe the difference in DeRosa's athletic ability and other MLB players is that, DeRo is the kind of guy who could basically play any sport he wanted to at an extremely high level, a lot of MLB players are amazing baseball players but bad at other sports, DeRo may not be more naturally athletic but he's more of an athletic freak than your every day MLB player.

Posted

 

Even more reason to acquire him. My point was just that all DeRosa is is a pure athlete with not much baseball ability, I mean if you ever look at his swing technicalities they are not pretty.

 

He has baseball abilities, just not real toolsy (not real fast, avg. arm, ok hands)

 

I tend to brush hitting mechanics to the side, if he can center the ball and drive it, which Derosa does well.

 

I don't mind them looking @ Roberts (depending on cost) as it gives the Cubs needed depth espec. as a bat off the bench and a good player who can play mult. positions. This team will suffer injuries next year and he will have value in that role.

 

I'm telling you that a guy who personally does training lessons with Mark DeRosa told me that he lacks a lot of the "baseball ability" and makes up for it with his athletic ability, this is not my quote this is a guy who personally trains him, so I'd say that it's gotta be pretty accurate.

 

 

Just FYI, let's just say Ping knows what he's talking about, too.

 

When the Astros are consulting Ping about which prospects are legit then I will believe his opinion is more reliable than my guy.

Posted
DeRo may not be more naturally athletic but he's more of an athletic freak than your every day MLB player.

 

I have no idea what this sentence means.

 

I agree with the guy who works with/for the Stros as far as lacking baseball ability to an extent. Nothing stands out as far as his instinct & he's not Theriot as far as fundamentals. But, he's strong and knows how to center and drive the ball and with those qualities combined with his versatility to play several positions, he's a quality guy to have. Until they upgrade, he's their best 2B option.

Posted
DeRo may not be more naturally athletic but he's more of an athletic freak than your every day MLB player.

 

I have no idea what this sentence means.

 

I agree with the guy who works the Stros as far as lacking baseball ability to an extent. Nothing stands out as far as his instinct & he's not Theriot as far as fundamentals. But, he's strong and knows how to center and drive the ball and with those qualities combined with his versatility to play several positions, he's a quality guy to have. Until they upgrade, he's their best 2B option.

 

hmm, yeah, like i said i dont know how to explain it, i know what i mean but i cant think of how to say it, i guess i mean like he's not the top tier in terms of speed, jumping, strength, and whatnot, but he has an ability to just pick up anything and naturally be really good at it that most people don't have, eh I guess thats how i can explain it.

 

 

Edit: yeah I think your explanation about nothing standing out as a way to explain the lack of baseball ability thing.

Posted

 

When the Astros are consulting Ping about which prospects are legit then I will believe his opinion is more reliable than my guy.

 

 

Hmmm.... Irony

 

 

Well, actually, I'm not sure it's the Astros, but yea.

Posted

 

When the Astros are consulting Ping about which prospects are legit then I will believe his opinion is more reliable than my guy.

 

 

Hmmm.... Irony

 

 

Well, actually, I'm not sure it's the Astros, but yea.

 

Yeah that was awesome.

Posted

 

When the Astros are consulting Ping about which prospects are legit then I will believe his opinion is more reliable than my guy.

 

 

Hmmm.... Irony

 

 

Well, actually, I'm not sure it's the Astros, but yea.

 

Yeah that was awesome.

 

Haven't been here long enough to know what you mean, inform me, I'm curious.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...