6/24 CUBS (Marshall) @ White Sox (Contreras), 1:05pm, WGN-TV

[Sarcastic]

Milwaukee ties it 3-3 in the bottom of the ninth, one out. :x

[cjbucks]

Corey Hart just tied the brewers game :cry:

[98navigator]

Hart just homered to tie the Brewers game in the 9th. It was off the defender's glove and over the wall on a 3-2 count. :x

[Fred Hornkohl]

Sunday 21 June 2007

CUBS @ white sox

13:05

 

 

                1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9              R  H  E
CUBS            0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0              3 12  0
white sox       0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0              0  7  0



CUBS
                     ab   r   h rbi  bb   k lob  sb  cs sac gdp   e  2b  3b  hr  sf  hb
Soriano       lf       5   1   3   1   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   1   0   0
Fontenot      2b       4   0   2   0   1   0   2   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Lee           1b       5   0   0   0   0   0   6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Ramirez       dh       5   1   2   0   0   0   2   0   0   0   0   0   1   0   0   0   0
Floyd         rf       3   0   2   0   0   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Pie           cf       0   1   0   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Pagan         cf-rf    4   0   1   1   0   1   3   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
DeRosa        3b       4   0   1   0   0   1   3   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
K Hill        c        3   0   1   1   0   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   1   0
Izturis       ss       4   0   0   0   0   0   2   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

totals                37   3  12   3   2   3  20   1   0   0   0   0   1   0   1   1   0



white sox
                     ab   r   h rbi  bb   k lob  sb  cs sac gdp   e  2b  3b  hr  sf  hb
Podsednik     lr       3   0   1   0   1   0   2   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Gonzalez      rf-cf    4   0   0   0   0   1   3   0   0   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0
Thome         dh       4   0   0   0   0   1   2   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Konerko       1b       4   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Pierzynski    c        3   0   0   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Iguchi        2b       4   0   3   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Fields        3b       4   0   0   0   0   3   4   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Terrero       cf       2   0   1   0   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Mackowiak     ph-rf    1   0   0   0   1   1   2   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
Uribe         ss       3   0   2   0   0   0   2   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

totals                32   0   7   0   3   7  15   0   0   0   1   0   0   0   0   0   0



CUBS
                 IP   H   R  ER  BB   K  HR  Pit
Marshall         6.3   5   0   0   1   3   0   81
Marmol           0.7   1   0   0   1   1   0   19
Ohman            1.0   0   0   0   0   1   0   17
Howry            1.0   1   0   0   1   2   0   20

totals           9.0   7   0   0   3   7   0  137


white sox
                 IP   H   R  ER  BB   K  HR  Pit
Contreras        7.0  10   2   2   0   3   1  106
Logan            1.0   2   1   1   1   0   0   18
MacDougal        1.0   0   0   0   1   0   0   20

totals           9.0  12   3   3   2   3   1  144



Home runs:
CUBS: Soriano (15)
white sox: none

W: Marshall (4-2)
S: Howry (2)
L: Contreras (5-8)

T: 3:08
A: 39,194

 

 

http://www.wfrfire.com/website/misc/tools/broom_big.jpg

[Soul]

No way the Royals win it now. Damn.

[TruffleShuffle]

somebody remind corey hart that he's not this good

[98navigator]

In case it hasn't already been mentioned, today's Cubs sweep of the Sox is the first, at the Cell, in their history (both teams have swept at Wrigley Field). :D

 

Now, it would be nice for the Royals and Phillies to win!

[cubscausestress]

somebody remind corey hart that he's not this good

 

the problem is, he is. watched him a ton last year here in nashville. he's good.

[TruffleShuffle]

somebody remind corey hart that he's not this good

 

the problem is, he is. watched him a ton last year here in nashville. he's good.

 

not .940 OPS good

[PackLandVA]

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j207/Jon148/w.gif

 

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j207/Jon148/sweep.gifhttp://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j207/Jon148/sweep.gifhttp://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j207/Jon148/sweep.gif

[pitchcs]

Like 8 people just posted that Corey Hart hit a HR.

[Omar]

Ozzie is giving hte Cubs credit.

 

"How many runs we score?"... "Wow, we really kill deh ball."

 

"We didnt play bad, they play really goo."

[Bruno7481]

I'm still more concerned about the Cubs winning ballgames then what Milwaukee is doing right now. Sure it would be nice for them to drop some games, but it doesn't matter much until the Cubs get above .500.

[BigSlick]

Go Royals go! Man on first no outs in the top of the 11th

[Soul]

Go Royals go! Man on first no outs in the top of the 11th

 

Too bad it's the Royals. :cry:

[RonnieWooWooSanto]

Bill Melton seems flustered on the postgame show.

[jjgman21]

I'm still more concerned about the Cubs winning ballgames then what Milwaukee is doing right now. Sure it would be nice for them to drop some games, but it doesn't matter much until the Cubs get above .500.

 

when the Cubs do reach .500, some of us would like them to be 5 or 6 games out, not 8-9 games out. not exactly a silly concept.

[Soul]

I'm still more concerned about the Cubs winning ballgames then what Milwaukee is doing right now. Sure it would be nice for them to drop some games, but it doesn't matter much until the Cubs get above .500.

 

when the Cubs do reach .500, some of us would like them to be 5 or 6 games out, not 8-9 games out. not exactly a silly concept.

 

I must also admit to be a little confused with the whole "let the Brewers win all they want until we're over .500" concept.

[Bruno7481]

I'm still more concerned about the Cubs winning ballgames then what Milwaukee is doing right now. Sure it would be nice for them to drop some games, but it doesn't matter much until the Cubs get above .500.

 

when the Cubs do reach .500, some of us would like them to be 5 or 6 games out, not 8-9 games out. not exactly a silly concept.

 

I must also admit to be a little confused with the whole "let the Brewers win all they want until we're over .500" concept.

 

Yeah, thats exactly what I said.

 

:roll:

[David]

I'm still more concerned about the Cubs winning ballgames then what Milwaukee is doing right now. Sure it would be nice for them to drop some games, but it doesn't matter much until the Cubs get above .500.

 

Actually, it does. It matters a whole lot more than getting to .500.

[Coach C]

KC wins, 4-3 in the 11th.

[Bruno7481]

The idea is the Cubs getting back to respectability. What does it say about the Cubs if they are 5-6 games back and still under .500? It means they aren't very good.

 

I don't want Milwaukee to win all their games, but it isn't going to mean crap if the Cubs aren't winning.

[jjgman21]

I'm still more concerned about the Cubs winning ballgames then what Milwaukee is doing right now. Sure it would be nice for them to drop some games, but it doesn't matter much until the Cubs get above .500.

 

when the Cubs do reach .500, some of us would like them to be 5 or 6 games out, not 8-9 games out. not exactly a silly concept.

 

I must also admit to be a little confused with the whole "let the Brewers win all they want until we're over .500" concept.

 

Yeah, thats exactly what I said.

 

:roll:

 

what you implied is we are more concerned with the Brewers losing than the Cubs winning. I don't think there is any evidence here that we are more concerned about the Brewers than the Cubs. check the length of the Cubs threads vs. 'other games' threads for evidence of exactly what is concerning us more.

 

you also said it doesn't matter, which it most certainly does, that is unless winning the division is not the objective here, and I think it is.

[Bruno7481]

I'm still more concerned about the Cubs winning ballgames then what Milwaukee is doing right now. Sure it would be nice for them to drop some games, but it doesn't matter much until the Cubs get above .500.

 

when the Cubs do reach .500, some of us would like them to be 5 or 6 games out, not 8-9 games out. not exactly a silly concept.

 

I must also admit to be a little confused with the whole "let the Brewers win all they want until we're over .500" concept.

 

Yeah, thats exactly what I said.

 

:roll:

 

what you implied is we are more concerned with the Brewers losing than the Cubs winning. I don't think there is any evidence here that we are more concerned about the Brewers than the Cubs. check the length of the Cubs threads vs. 'other games' threads for evidence of exactly what is concerning us more.

 

 

I did not imply that. Your welcome to do whatever you want, but personally I'll start paying more attention to the standings when the Cubs are a serious threat.

[CubColtPacer]

The idea is the Cubs getting back to respectability. What does it say about the Cubs if they are 5-6 games back and still under .500? It means they aren't very good.

 

I don't want Milwaukee to win all their games, but it isn't going to mean crap if the Cubs aren't winning.

 

Right now, I just care about the Cubs winning the division (or the WC). If it takes 90, fine. If it takes 85 or less, I'm plenty happy with that as well. How the Brewers do over the next month has a big impact on if the Cubs are in the race or out of the race at the deadline (of course, what the Cubs do has a bigger impact).