Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted (edited)
Buster Olney on Mike & Mike right now, saying Andy MacPhail has agreed in principle to become the Chief Operating Officer of the Baltimore Orioles. Also speculated that Joe Girardi might come aboard as the manager, pending Sam Perlozzo's fate. Edited by 3Dog

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Yikes. MacPhail keeps getting by based on his heritage and not his organizational ability.

 

I don't see Girardi taking the Orioles job mid-season. He'll probably wait until the off-season to see what the Yankees do with Torre before moving onto another team.

Posted

I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

Posted
I feel sorry for the Orioles. It just keeps getting worse for them.

 

That franchise has been down for what, ten years now? What track record does MacPhail that makes them think he can get them back in the race with Yanks and Sox? For a dozen years he had a high payroll team that could have spent more but he apparently refused to approve it. Now he has to keep up with two 200 million dollar payrolls, one on the rise (Jays), and a young team with talent whose arrow is pointing up (Rays).

 

Best of luck, Andy.

Posted
I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

 

Maybe because he was only the GM for two years of his tenure here? Get your facts straight.

Posted
I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

 

Maybe because he was only the GM for two years of his tenure here? Get your facts straight.

 

Wow, sorry. Maybe if you try you can be a jackass about it next time.

 

I meant President, not GM.

Posted
I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

 

Maybe because he was only the GM for two years of his tenure here? Get your facts straight.

 

You definetly work for the Tribune company.

Posted
Call him up, Jim. Ask for Tejada!!!

 

I'm sure there are a few knuckleheads in our system that MacPhail is in love with.

 

Dopirak, Harvey, and Luke Hagerty for Tejada? :lol:

 

Doesn't the OPS drop (100 pts) YTD vs previous two years norms and the fact that he's owed $31MM over the next two season's bother anyone?

 

I'm just not sure the cost that it would take to acquire him at this stage of his career would be a wise move to make.

Posted
Call him up, Jim. Ask for Tejada!!!

 

I'm sure there are a few knuckleheads in our system that MacPhail is in love with.

 

Dopirak, Harvey, and Luke Hagerty for Tejada? :lol:

 

Doesn't the OPS drop (100 pts) YTD vs previous two years norms and the fact that he's owed $31MM over the next two season's bother anyone?

 

I'm just not sure the cost that it would take to acquire him at this stage of his career would be a wise move to make.

 

Not when that OPS is 200+ points higher than our current SS rotation sits at.

Posted (edited)
I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

 

Maybe because he was only the GM for two years of his tenure here? Get your facts straight.

 

Wow, sorry. Maybe if you try you can be a jackass about it next time.

 

I meant President, not GM.

 

EH? I made a comment.

Edited by RedIvyCub
Posted
I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

 

Maybe because he was only the GM for two years of his tenure here? Get your facts straight.

 

You definetly work for the Tribune company.

 

Why, because I told him to get his facts straight? Those are the facts. MacPhail was Cubs GM from July 2000 to July 2002...TWO years. I just happen to pay more attention to the business side of the game because it fascinates me.

 

That doesn't mean that I work for Tribune Company.

 

I think the responses to my post shows why I don't have a lot of posts for the number of years that I have been a member of this community.

Posted
I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

 

Maybe because he was only the GM for two years of his tenure here? Get your facts straight.

 

You definetly work for the Tribune company.

 

Why, because I told him to get his facts straight? Those are the facts. MacPhail was Cubs GM from July 2000 to July 2002...TWO years. I just happen to pay more attention to the business side of the game because it fascinates me.

 

That doesn't mean that I work for Tribune Company.

 

I think the responses to my post shows why I don't have a lot of posts for the number of years that I have been a member of this community.

 

And why is that exactly?

Posted
I was just reading the story on ESPN, and in the third paragraph it mentions that "MacPhail won two World Series championships with the Twins in 1987 and 1991."

 

I find it curious that it makes no mention of his failures as Cubs GM for an approximate 10 year period of time.

 

Maybe because he was only the GM for two years of his tenure here? Get your facts straight.

 

You definetly work for the Tribune company.

 

Why, because I told him to get his facts straight? Those are the facts. MacPhail was Cubs GM from July 2000 to July 2002...TWO years. I just happen to pay more attention to the business side of the game because it fascinates me.

 

That doesn't mean that I work for Tribune Company.

 

I think the responses to my post shows why I don't have a lot of posts for the number of years that I have been a member of this community.

I just seems that everytime there is bashing of old Andy around here, you show up. Regardless of how much time he served as GM, Andy Failure was a disgrace to this organization, whether as President or GM, and I find it hillarious that another organization would give him anything better than a mop job.

Posted
Call him up, Jim. Ask for Tejada!!!

 

I'm sure there are a few knuckleheads in our system that MacPhail is in love with.

 

Dopirak, Harvey, and Luke Hagerty for Tejada? :lol:

 

Doesn't the OPS drop (100 pts) YTD vs previous two years norms and the fact that he's owed $31MM over the next two season's bother anyone?

 

I'm just not sure the cost that it would take to acquire him at this stage of his career would be a wise move to make.

 

It's worth it as long as he plays SS. He was a bargain playing the way he has the past 2 seasons. He's still hitting .302 with a .355 OBP. His major drop has been in SLG (over 80 points), and his OPS is still over .750. There just aren't a lot of shortstops that are good or even mediocre hitters.

 

That said, it would take a lot to get Tejada. I think you'd have to get the O's to take one of Marquis/Lilly to make the salarys work for 08 and 09. What else it would take to get him, I don't know? I imagine they will want a lot, maybe more than the Cubs have to give. If they'd take a deal of Murton, Guzman, and Lilly or Marquis, I'd probably do it.

 

The deal also would preclude the signing of Zambrano, one would think, which raises the possibility of something like Tejada for Zambrano and Izturis. The O's need pitching in the worst way to compete in that division, and probably will have the money to re-up Zambrano. A trade like this would probably only work if the O's could reach an agreement on an extension with Z prior to the trade. The deal would basically be a wash in the payroll department, as Z/Izturis make similar to what Tejada does this year, and Z figures to cost about the same as Tejada in his new deal. The Cubs would end up spending about what they would have spent to resign Z on a per year basis, but have fewer years committed. I would definitely approve of a deal like this.

Posted
It's worth it as long as he plays SS. He was a bargain playing the way he has the past 2 seasons. He's still hitting .302 with a .355 OBP. His major drop has been in SLG (over 80 points), and his OPS is still over .750. There just aren't a lot of shortstops that are good or even mediocre hitters.

 

That said, it would take a lot to get Tejada. I think you'd have to get the O's to take one of Marquis/Lilly to make the salarys work for 08 and 09. What else it would take to get him, I don't know? I imagine they will want a lot, maybe more than the Cubs have to give. If they'd take a deal of Murton, Guzman, and Lilly or Marquis, I'd probably do it.

 

The deal also would preclude the signing of Zambrano, one would think, which raises the possibility of something like Tejada for Zambrano and Izturis. The O's need pitching in the worst way to compete in that division, and probably will have the money to re-up Zambrano. A trade like this would probably only work if the O's could reach an agreement on an extension with Z prior to the trade. The deal would basically be a wash in the payroll department, as Z/Izturis make similar to what Tejada does this year, and Z figures to cost about the same as Tejada in his new deal. The Cubs would end up spending about what they would have spent to resign Z on a per year basis, but have fewer years committed. I would definitely approve of a deal like this.

 

First, Baltimore needs to decide on a direction for their organization. The past couple of years, it's been a piecemeal attempt at respectability. They either need to commit to spending (ala the 2007 Cubs) or rebuilding (ala the 2003 Indians).

 

If it's the former, then a Z + Izturis trade for Tejada would be feasible, but not overly beneficial to the Cubs. With the way Z has pitched in his past couple of outings, Tejada's offense won't counteract Z's absence.

 

However, if they commit to rebuilding, I would be willing to part with Marshall + EPatt + another pitching prospect for Tejada.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...