Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
what does it matter a whole lot if his fastball MPH goes down? Power pitchers need to rely on placement and movement more then speed as their career stretches out longer.

 

It matters, because stuff matters, and when your stuff lessens, your effectiveness lessens. Guys can still be relatively effective with less stuff, but they won't be as effective. And less MPH can also suggest some sort of health issue, which could lead to much worse things in the near or long-term.

 

Probably just indicates age in Schmidt's case. He's 33 and pitched effectively last year for 200+ innings at that velocity. He's just getting old, but there's no reason he won't age gracefully.

  • Replies 760
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
shoulder injuries have destroyed many a young pitcher. I see his return to 2003 form as low probability for that reason. it can happen a la chris carpenter, but frequently doesn't.

 

Yeah but we dont even know what was wrong with that shoulder. Its not like he had a defined rotator cuff tear or something of that nature. It doesnt seem like he's had the type of injuries you cant come back from.

 

I'm not a doctor, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once. Anyway, there seems to be increasing evidence that everything in the shoulder is linked - ie rotator cuff injuries are linked to labrums etc. The fact that his injury is undefined makes me less confident of his future rather than more confident. Something isn't right.

Posted
Schmidt's velocity may be tailing off, but that's what happens to most pitchers at some point. He's been through some tough seasons already, and pitched a heck of a lot. My guess is, he'll do a slow burn down until he isn't effective anymore---and that point won't likely be reached until maybe 3 years from now.

 

He pitched another 200+ innings last year, and he was supposed to be broken down *then*. Had another 180 K's, went to the All-Star game again (yeah, yeah---means nothing, except it actually does).

 

I don't see him falling off the cliff like a Wood or Prior. I'd sign Schmitty to up to 4 years.

 

Unless your Roger Clemens then you miraculously get better with age. Wonder how he does that?

Posted
Schmidt's velocity may be tailing off, but that's what happens to most pitchers at some point. He's been through some tough seasons already, and pitched a heck of a lot. My guess is, he'll do a slow burn down until he isn't effective anymore---and that point won't likely be reached until maybe 3 years from now.

 

He pitched another 200+ innings last year, and he was supposed to be broken down *then*. Had another 180 K's, went to the All-Star game again (yeah, yeah---means nothing, except it actually does).

 

I don't see him falling off the cliff like a Wood or Prior. I'd sign Schmitty to up to 4 years.

 

Unless your Roger Clemens then you miraculously get better with age. Wonder how he does that?

 

B-12 shots....

Posted

 

Unless your Roger Clemens then you miraculously get better with age. Wonder how he does that?

 

Roger Clemens is actually Schmidt's #3 comp in PECOTA. There are some pretty impressive names in the top 20: Jack Morris, Roger Clemens, Bob Gibson, Steve Carlton, Tom Seaver, Curt Schilling, and David Cone. Many (if not all) of those guys pitched several very good seasons after their 33rd birthdays.

 

Of course, there are several guys on Schmidt's comp list that became ineffective after their 33rd birthday. Hideo Nomo was good at 34 (2003) for example, but when he turned 35 (2004), his ERA doubled.

Posted
what does it matter a whole lot if his fastball MPH goes down? Power pitchers need to rely on placement and movement more then speed as their career stretches out longer.

 

It matters, because stuff matters, and when your stuff lessens, your effectiveness lessens. Guys can still be relatively effective with less stuff, but they won't be as effective. And less MPH can also suggest some sort of health issue, which could lead to much worse things in the near or long-term.

 

Probably just indicates age in Schmidt's case. He's 33 and pitched effectively last year for 200+ innings at that velocity. He's just getting old, but there's no reason he won't age gracefully.

 

There's no reason he can't age gracefully, but there's plenty of reasons why he might not. Schmidt wasn't any good in 2005, was it a fluke or the signs of a guy nearing decline.

 

None of us knows what the future holds for him. There are plenty of comparisons that would seem to indicate he could really stink in just 2 or 3 years. There is some reason to believe he could last another 5-6. Let's not pretend there's no chance of serious setbacks here. He's not an unblemished pitcher.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

Trading for starters instead of free agents is looking better every minute.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

Ted Lilly you say.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

How much do you want to bet?

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

How much do you want to bet?

 

i'd like to take that too.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

Carlos Lee got 17M a year after putting up an average of under 120 OPS+ over the last 4 years, Schmidt has put up an average of over 130 ERA+ over the same period. While Schmidt is older, Lee dresses up like the State Puff Marshmallow man for Halloween and every other day of the year and signed to a longer term contract than Schmidt is rumor to be signed for.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

Carlos Lee got 17M a year after putting up an average of under 120 OPS+ over the last 4 years, Schmidt has put up an average of over 130 ERA+ over the same period. While Schmidt is older, Lee dresses up like the State Puff Marshmallow man for Halloween and every other day of the year and signed to a longer term contract than Schmidt is rumor to be signed for.

 

The way this market is going with such low depth at all positions, I wouldn't doubt he would recieve an offer in that range. I just hope Hendry is smart enough to not offer him a contract that exceeds 45 million.

Posted
I dont understand the concept that Schmidt isnt worth 15 million when Lilly is being offered 10 million per. Thats insane. He's worth the extra five and then some.
Posted (edited)

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

Carlos Lee got 17M a year after putting up an average of under 120 OPS+ over the last 4 years, Schmidt has put up an average of over 130 ERA+ over the same period. While Schmidt is older, Lee dresses up like the State Puff Marshmallow man for Halloween and every other day of the year and signed to a longer term contract than Schmidt is rumor to be signed for.

 

The way this market is going with such low depth at all positions, I wouldn't doubt he would recieve an offer in that range. I just hope Hendry is smart enough to not offer him a contract that exceeds 45 million.

I would also doubt that he receives an offer in that range.

 

Also, I think he would receive an offer in that range.

Edited by sethuel1
Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

Carlos Lee got 17M a year after putting up an average of under 120 OPS+ over the last 4 years, Schmidt has put up an average of over 130 ERA+ over the same period. While Schmidt is older, Lee dresses up like the State Puff Marshmallow man for Halloween and every other day of the year and signed to a longer term contract than Schmidt is rumor to be signed for.

 

The way this market is going with such low depth at all positions, I wouldn't doubt he would recieve an offer in that range. I just hope Hendry is smart enough to not offer him a contract that exceeds 45 million.

 

So are you saying the Cubs won't offer Schmidt 60-70 million or that he won't get that much. In your first post, it appears that you are saying he won't get that much. Now, it appears you're contradicting yourself saying he will get that offer, but you hope it's not from the Cubs. So which is it?

 

I'm certain he could get 60 million. I'm just not sure it will be from the Cubs.

Posted

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

Carlos Lee got 17M a year after putting up an average of under 120 OPS+ over the last 4 years, Schmidt has put up an average of over 130 ERA+ over the same period. While Schmidt is older, Lee dresses up like the State Puff Marshmallow man for Halloween and every other day of the year and signed to a longer term contract than Schmidt is rumor to be signed for.

 

The way this market is going with such low depth at all positions, I wouldn't doubt he would recieve an offer in that range. I just hope Hendry is smart enough to not offer him a contract that exceeds 45 million.

I would also doubt that he receives an offer in that range.

 

Also, I think he would receive an offer in that range.

 

I also do not doubt that I am doubting that someone will offer Schmidt a $60 million contarct.

 

But I don't doubt it can happen.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

I doubt Schmidt will get an offer in the 60-70 million range.

 

Carlos Lee got 17M a year after putting up an average of under 120 OPS+ over the last 4 years, Schmidt has put up an average of over 130 ERA+ over the same period. While Schmidt is older, Lee dresses up like the State Puff Marshmallow man for Halloween and every other day of the year and signed to a longer term contract than Schmidt is rumor to be signed for.

 

The way this market is going with such low depth at all positions, I wouldn't doubt he would recieve an offer in that range. I just hope Hendry is smart enough to not offer him a contract that exceeds 45 million.

 

So are you saying the Cubs won't offer Schmidt 60-70 million or that he won't get that much. In your first post, it appears that you are saying he won't get that much. Now, it appears you're contradicting yourself saying he will get that offer, but you hope it's not from the Cubs. So which is it?

 

I'm certain he could get 60 million. I'm just not sure it will be from the Cubs.

 

Does he deserve 60-70 million at this point in his career? NO. Paying anything in the range of 70 million for a declining 34 year old pitcher is not a smart move. The only way I see him getting that much money is if some team has to offer him that much to get him out of the west coast.

 

I see Hendry offering him a contract, but I dont see him offering anything close to 70 million. Specially if he goes out at signs Lilly to a contract.

Posted
I dont understand the concept that Schmidt isnt worth 15 million when Lilly is being offered 10 million per. Thats insane. He's worth the extra five and then some.

 

because what can be done with the extra 5M could possibly improve the team more than just having Schmidt.

 

I also have seen nothing on Lilly being offered 10M, more in the 8-9 range. his agent is on the record as saying he wants Washburn money, ie 9M/year.

Posted
The Cardinals plan to meet with the agent for Jason Schmidt during the winter meetings.

It's believed Schmidt would prefer to play for a West Coast team, but if he's not locked into that, St. Louis would have to be appealing, assuming the Cards can put the same kind of offer on the table as the other top bidders. In this market, Schmidt should go for no less than $60 million for four years or $70 million for five.

 

This alone should be more inspiration to put a nice offer out there for him, 3 years isn't going to get it done, and the last thing you want is for the Cardinals to end up with him. Start thinking like the Sox and Yankees. You gotta block what the other teams that are in your division are trying to do. You get better while they do not. You sign Schmidt and they are forced to sign the Lillys and Padillas.

Posted
I dont understand the concept that Schmidt isnt worth 15 million when Lilly is being offered 10 million per. Thats insane. He's worth the extra five and then some.

 

because what can be done with the extra 5M could possibly improve the team more than just having Schmidt.

 

I also have seen nothing on Lilly being offered 10M, more in the 8-9 range. his agent is on the record as saying he wants Washburn money, ie 9M/year.

 

While in a normal offseason year i'd tend to agree with you, this year, the player talent available in free agency is pretty thin. The drop off between the A free agents and the B free agents is pretty steep. I also dont see where you'd make up for the talent difference between Lilly and Schmidt in free agency elsewhere.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...