Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I would have loved Jose Cruz over Cesar Izturis... and quite obviously, I think we could have had him, plus maybe a mid-grade prospect.
Posted

someone's going to get a nice little player.

\\and it won 't be the Cubs. Too bad. He'd make a nice platoon partner w/ Jacque. Then again, so would Murton.

 

Oh well. We've always got Bynum.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Cubs already have a player similar to Cruz Jr, Angel Pagan.

 

you couldn't be more incorrect.

The real question is do the Cubs currently have any outfielder that's actually better than Jose Cruz Jr.

Posted
Cubs already have a player similar to Cruz Jr, Angel Pagan.

 

you couldn't be more incorrect.

The real question is do the Cubs currently have any outfielder that's actually better than Jose Cruz Jr.

 

What were Pagan's numbers like in thne minors?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Cubs already have a player similar to Cruz Jr, Angel Pagan.

 

you couldn't be more incorrect.

The real question is do the Cubs currently have any outfielder that's actually better than Jose Cruz Jr.

 

What were Pagan's numbers like in thne minors?

The first words that come to mind are "quite bad."

 

.282/.344/.373. And he struck out over twice as many times as he walked.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Matt Murton 2006 (I'll leave out his 2005 stats because he faced more lefties than righties): .282/.350/.375

 

Jacque Jones 2004: .254/.315/.427

Jacque Jones 2005: .249/.319/.438

Jacque Jones 2006: .285/.315/.489

 

Jose Cruz Jr. 2004: .242/.333/.433

Jose Cruz Jr. 2005 (370 ABs): .251/.364/.473

Jose Cruz Jr. 2006: .233/.353/.381

 

 

I'd expect Cruz's BA to rise a bit and Jones' SLG to drop the rest of the way. A case could be made for Cruz.

Posted
Matt Murton 2006 (I'll leave out his 2005 stats because he faced more lefties than righties): .282/.350/.375

 

Jacque Jones 2004: .254/.315/.427

Jacque Jones 2005: .249/.319/.438

Jacque Jones 2006: .285/.315/.489

 

Not to change the topic, but isn't it incredible that his average increased this year 31 and 36 points from his previous two seasons, yet his OBP remained the same as '04 and dropped from last year?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Matt Murton 2006 (I'll leave out his 2005 stats because he faced more lefties than righties): .282/.350/.375

 

Jacque Jones 2004: .254/.315/.427

Jacque Jones 2005: .249/.319/.438

Jacque Jones 2006: .285/.315/.489

 

Not to change the topic, but isn't it incredible that his average increased this year 31 and 36 points from his previous two seasons, yet his OBP remained the same as '04 and dropped from last year?

It actually got up to .340 on July 3rd, but when you put up a .237/.260/.419 line in the month of July, that OBP is going to take a hit. But his walk rate is down this season. He's on pace for 21 walks this season compared to 40 and 51 in 2004 and 2005 respectively (weighted to the 523 ABs he had in 2005).

Posted
Matt Murton 2006 (I'll leave out his 2005 stats because he faced more lefties than righties): .282/.350/.375

 

Jacque Jones 2004: .254/.315/.427

Jacque Jones 2005: .249/.319/.438

Jacque Jones 2006: .285/.315/.489

 

Not to change the topic, but isn't it incredible that his average increased this year 31 and 36 points from his previous two seasons, yet his OBP remained the same as '04 and dropped from last year?

 

14 walks on the season, which is obviously pathetic.

Posted
Matt Murton 2006 (I'll leave out his 2005 stats because he faced more lefties than righties): .282/.350/.375

 

Jacque Jones 2004: .254/.315/.427

Jacque Jones 2005: .249/.319/.438

Jacque Jones 2006: .285/.315/.489

 

Not to change the topic, but isn't it incredible that his average increased this year 31 and 36 points from his previous two seasons, yet his OBP remained the same as '04 and dropped from last year?

 

14 walks on the season, which is obviously pathetic.

 

I think there was speculation that the only reason his walks were up in '04 and '05 was an increase in intentional walks issued to him given the Twins lack of hitting around him.

Posted

In regards to my last post, in 2004 Jones was HBP 10 times, whereas his previous high was 5. In 2005 he had 12 IBB, whereas his previous high was 4.

 

Although 5-8 extra times on base due to anything but a hit or error shouldn't inflate your OBP too much, in Jones' case it does. His OBP historically is so close to his BA that those slight increases those two years gave him a much larger difference in BA to OBP than he had ever had before.

 

A difference we're not seeing this year because he's not been IBB'd or hit much.

Posted

Absolutely perfect 4th OF. Can play all 3 OF positions at a gold glove level. Kills LHP, good to great throwing arm. Will get on base. Has a good power . Has above average speed.

 

I would love if the Cubs had Jose Cruz Jr. on the 2007 team, and he actually was the 4th best OF.

Posted
vs lhp, 2006

 

67 at bats

313/420/522

 

vs lhp, 2003-2005

 

374 at bats

291/392/497

 

 

someone's going to get a nice little player.

 

for those who didn't notice, I've been standing on my head the past three weeks saying this is the guy the Cubs should target in the Maddux trade. the perfect platoon player for Jones, can play all outfield positions, etc. etc. etc. he's the perfect player to have around if the Cubs are going to keep Jones.

 

edit - depending on the condition of Lowell's foot, how about Cruz to Cubs, Nevin to RedSox, RedSox whatever to Dodgers.

Posted
Cubs already have a player similar to Cruz Jr, Angel Pagan.

 

you couldn't be more incorrect.

 

I used the word "similar". Which means, they have have SOME things in common. Speed, defense, and possibly the same kind of average. They both will strikeout alot also.

Posted
Cubs already have a player similar to Cruz Jr, Angel Pagan.

 

you couldn't be more incorrect.

 

I used the word "similar". Which means, they have have SOME things in common. Speed, defense, and possibly the same kind of average. They both will strikeout alot also.

 

one has a history of getting on base at a decent clip and hitting for decent power. the other has a history of not getting on base at a decent clip and not hitting for decent power. the former has done so in the majors, the other has done so in the minors.

 

sure there are similarities, but your post in this context really conotates that pagan would be just as good a fourth outfielder as Cruz. I'm beginning to like Pagan actually, but as a fifth, not a fourth, outfielder.

Posted
Cruz received his release from the Dodgers today. They are now on the hook for the rest of his salary. Cruz would be a better reserve outfielder than Pagan right now. He'd be worth a look as he could be a decent bench option for next season.
Posted
Cruz received his release from the Dodgers today. They are now on the hook for the rest of his salary. Cruz would be a better reserve outfielder than Pagan right now. He'd be worth a look as he could be a decent bench option for next season.

 

Why would we want to get rid of Pagan right now for a 32 year old who Pagan has outproduced this year in limited at bats? I'm not saying Pagan is going to be anything special-we should give him some more at bats to find out what he is though. Why give up on him to get a player who is almost 100 points worse in OPS this season and 7 years older in a lost season?

Posted
Cruz received his release from the Dodgers today. They are now on the hook for the rest of his salary. Cruz would be a better reserve outfielder than Pagan right now. He'd be worth a look as he could be a decent bench option for next season.

 

I'd imagine he'd join a contender. RedSox?

 

edit or Anaheim as suggested above.

Posted
Cruz received his release from the Dodgers today. They are now on the hook for the rest of his salary. Cruz would be a better reserve outfielder than Pagan right now. He'd be worth a look as he could be a decent bench option for next season.

 

I'd imagine he'd join a contender. RedSox?

 

edit or Anaheim as suggested above.

 

You're probably right. I wouldn't rule him out joining Houston.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...