Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Derek had a monstrous year this year, and probably the best for the cub since sosa's MVP season. His value has never been higher, and i dont think it will ever be. He is way underpaid for his production, and a team that needs one big bat and a 1B for the next 4-5 years would salavate at a deal for him. I just dont think lee will ever hit as well as he did this year agian, maybe marginally higher than his career norms, a line like .300/.380/.550 might be a reality next season.

Id like to see wat a package of him and someone like hill or williams could bring in.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

No way, you don't trade away your best players, we have a 100 million dollar payroll, we can keep our All-Stars.

 

I want Lee signed to an extension this off-season...

Posted
No way, you don't trade away your best players, we have a 100 million dollar payroll, we can keep our All-Stars.

 

I want Lee signed to an extension this off-season...

 

What if trading Lee got you another All-Star, possibly one younger and more likely to stay at their current numbers than Lee? There's a lot of good hitting 1B, I'd explore the possiblity.

Posted
No way, you don't trade away your best players, we have a 100 million dollar payroll, we can keep our All-Stars.

 

I want Lee signed to an extension this off-season...

 

What if trading Lee got you another All-Star, possibly one younger and more likely to stay at their current numbers than Lee? There's a lot of good hitting 1B, I'd explore the possiblity.

 

The only way I would consider trading Lee is if maybe it is to Texas for Mench and Gonzalez who is gonna be a stud hitting 1B if you can give up Lee and a midlevel prospect for Mench, Gonzalez and another prospect maybe. Then they could have Texiera be the DH. But i dont see Texas doing this deal becasue they need pitching.

Posted
No way, you don't trade away your best players, we have a 100 million dollar payroll, we can keep our All-Stars.

 

I want Lee signed to an extension this off-season...

 

What if trading Lee got you another All-Star, possibly one younger and more likely to stay at their current numbers than Lee? There's a lot of good hitting 1B, I'd explore the possiblity.

 

The only way I would consider trading Lee is if maybe it is to Texas for Mench and Gonzalez who is gonna be a stud hitting 1B if you can give up Lee and a midlevel prospect for Mench, Gonzalez and another prospect maybe. Then they could have Texiera be the DH. But i dont see Texas doing this deal becasue they need pitching.

 

Lee to LA

Cubs prospect(s) to Milwaukee

LA prospects to Cincy

Dunn to Chicago

Overbay to Chicago

 

Just throwing it out there.

Posted
No way, you don't trade away your best players, we have a 100 million dollar payroll, we can keep our All-Stars.

 

I want Lee signed to an extension this off-season...

 

What if trading Lee got you another All-Star, possibly one younger and more likely to stay at their current numbers than Lee? There's a lot of good hitting 1B, I'd explore the possiblity.

I agree. I think Lee could get us a very good OFer and a pitching prospect or a reliever who can help the team next year. To fill the hole at 1B, Cubs can look into getting someone like Helton. If Lee was a couple years younger and was locked up for more than one more year, I'd be against it. It would be nice to see Hendry sell high. It seems like he hasn't done that in a while.

Posted

Why would you want to trade an underpaid 1b who has triple crown and gold glove potential? Lee is one of the few players on the whole team that actually has played consistently well.

 

I can understand why you would want to upgrade at other positions, but unless you are getting Pujols from the Cards is seems ill advised to get rid of him.

Posted
Derek had a monstrous year this year, and probably the best for the cub since sosa's MVP season. His value has never been higher, and i dont think it will ever be. He is way underpaid for his production, and a team that needs one big bat and a 1B for the next 4-5 years would salavate at a deal for him. I just dont think lee will ever hit as well as he did this year agian, maybe marginally higher than his career norms, a line like .300/.380/.550 might be a reality next season.

Id like to see wat a package of him and someone like hill or williams could bring in.

 

Not to nitpick, but Sosa's 2001 season was better than his MVP season.

 

As for Lee, I'd trade him, but only for a very good return. I may just be too tired, but I can't think of any teams that need a 1B who could give us an adequate young power bat in return. At least none that I would want to have Lee.

Posted
Why would you want to trade an underpaid 1b who has triple crown and gold glove potential? Lee is one of the few players on the whole team that actually has played consistently well.

 

I can understand why you would want to upgrade at other positions, but unless you are getting Pujols from the Cards is seems ill advised to get rid of him.

The thing is he won't be underpaid for long. It's kind of risky to give him Pujols-type money after one stellar season.

Posted

I think it would be a big mistake for the Cubs to offer Lee a mega money extension like some want them to. Since the all-star break he has hit .286 with a .381 OBP and .573 SLG for a .954 OPS. Still very good, but a far cry from his first half numbers.

 

I would wait and see what he does next season before pulling an Adrian Beltre or Carlos Beltran like the Mariners and Mets did based on basically one season and one post-season respectively.

 

I would only trade Lee if I could get half a team for him like the Brewers did with Sexson.

Posted
I think it would be a big mistake for the Cubs to offer Lee a mega money extension like some want them to. Since the all-star break he has hit .286 with a .381 OBP and .573 SLG for a .954 OPS. Still very good, but a far cry from his first half numbers.

 

I would wait and see what he does next season before pulling an Adrian Beltre or Carlos Beltran like the Mariners and Mets did based on basically one season and one post-season respectively.

 

I would only trade Lee if I could get half a team for him like the Brewers did with Sexson.

 

Correct.

There's a reason they call them "career years". Let's see if Lee's finally figured it all out, or if this was a fluke. I too say we give him the benefit of the doubt and see what happens - even at career numbers, he's a solid player. Besides, he's carried the team this season... the least we can do is give him a shot to repeat.

Posted

 

Lee to LA

Cubs prospect(s) to Milwaukee

LA prospects to Cincy

Dunn to Chicago

Overbay to Chicago

 

Just throwing it out there.

 

That works out as a straight up Lee for Dunn trade. While not a bad trade, I think we could do better. Id look to have LA also throw prospects to Washington to get Guillen.

 

Hairston

Overbay

ARAM

Dunn

Guillen/Nomar

Nomar/Guillen

Walker

Barrett

 

That lineup would undoubtedly lead the NL in OBP and be extremely extremely cheap.

Posted
Take Tex out of Texas and you have Ass. Just kidding, but seriously, he's not great out of that park. I'd really rather just keep Lee.
Posted
The only way I would consider trading Lee is if maybe it is to Texas for Mench and Gonzalez who is gonna be a stud hitting 1B if you can give up Lee and a midlevel prospect for Mench, Gonzalez and another prospect maybe. Then they could have Texiera be the DH. But i dont see Texas doing this deal becasue they need pitching.

 

Now a Lee for Mench/Gonzalez deal is very intriguing. But I would insist on a very good prospect be thrown in the deal.

Posted
Lee is a rare player that uses all 5 tools, plays first with a gold glove, stays healthy, and is an all around good guy with a reasonable contract. He has value because he is a rarity and trading such a rare player will only net us a bunch of less than remarkable players that we could pick up as free agents or through a non-D. Lee trade. I'd rather overpay $ to get position players at other positions than trade D. Lee.
Posted
Lee is a rare player that uses all 5 tools, plays first with a gold glove, stays healthy, and is an all around good guy with a reasonable contract. He has value because he is a rarity and trading such a rare player will only net us a bunch of less than remarkable players that we could pick up as free agents or through a non-D. Lee trade. I'd rather overpay $ to get position players at other positions than trade D. Lee.

 

The problem is the players aren't out there on the market to overpay for.

Posted
How many more errors is our infield going to have w/o DLee? I'd pencil in just Aramis for 10+ more easy.

 

It depends on who you get to replace Lee. In my hypothetical where we get Overbay as well, you don't lose much defense at 1B.

Posted

 

Not to nitpick, but Sosa's 2001 season was better than his MVP season.

 

Haha, I was thinking the exact same thing, but I didn't want to say anything.

 

sosa's 2001 season is probably one of the 10-15 greatest single seasons ever.

 

 

sosa's 2001 season is probably one of the 10-15 greatest single seasons during the steroid era.

 

Looking at relative numbers and eras, it's a long way from when Babe Ruth hit more homers than all the other AL teams combined.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...