Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

Posted
Newcomb that inning threw 24 pitches that inning, 17 cutters. Including 14 of the first 17 pitches. Clearly that's the pitch Hottovy is eying for him to work on.
Posted
Leiter out of the pen. Don’t think Miley or Mills are ready yet. Killian coming up?

 

Thompson relieved Leiter's last start so my money would be on trying to get 4-5 out of him before Kilian. But Kilian's last start did line up with Leiter's so it's not impossible.

Posted
Leiter out of the pen. Don’t think Miley or Mills are ready yet. Killian coming up?

 

Thompson relieved Leiter's last start so my money would be on trying to get 4-5 out of him before Kilian. But Kilian's last start did line up with Leiter's so it's not impossible.

 

With off days Monday and Thursday my guess is they're just skipping the #5 spot this go around. From there I believe Miley's set for a rehab start, maybe they think he only needs one?

Posted
Guess we aren’t going to be able to trade Kyle for anything good huh?

 

If the FO office would have admitted that we were rebuilding instead of retooling, we could have gotten something pretty good for him during the off season.

Posted
Guess we aren’t going to be able to trade Kyle for anything good huh?

 

If the FO office would have admitted that we were rebuilding instead of retooling, we could have gotten something pretty good for him during the off season.

 

Well this is just made up nonsense, he was a mess last year.

 

Kyle had two problems last year: he basically stopped being able to miss bats, and while he still was a soft contact guy a higher proportion of the hard contact he did allow was in the air. Combine those two factors and he got donged into oblivion.

 

This year he's missing bats again, but his groundball rate is evaporating and he's giving up hard contact at a little more than a league average rate. IMO the former is more encouraging than the latter is discouraging, but not by a lot and I was already really worried about him coming into the year.

Posted
Guess we aren’t going to be able to trade Kyle for anything good huh?

 

If the FO office would have admitted that we were rebuilding instead of retooling, we could have gotten something pretty good for him during the off season.

 

Well this is just made up nonsense, he was a mess last year.

 

Kyle had two problems last year: he basically stopped being able to miss bats, and while he still was a soft contact guy a higher proportion of the hard contact he did allow was in the air. Combine those two factors and he got donged into oblivion.

 

This year he's missing bats again, but his groundball rate is evaporating and he's giving up hard contact at a little more than a league average rate. IMO the former is more encouraging than the latter is discouraging, but not by a lot and I was already really worried about him coming into the year.

 

With all of the teams needing pitching help and signing and/or trading for pitchers with arm problems and lesser success, I can't believe someone wouldn't have traded for him.

Posted

 

If the FO office would have admitted that we were rebuilding instead of retooling, we could have gotten something pretty good for him during the off season.

 

Well this is just made up nonsense, he was a mess last year.

 

Kyle had two problems last year: he basically stopped being able to miss bats, and while he still was a soft contact guy a higher proportion of the hard contact he did allow was in the air. Combine those two factors and he got donged into oblivion.

 

This year he's missing bats again, but his groundball rate is evaporating and he's giving up hard contact at a little more than a league average rate. IMO the former is more encouraging than the latter is discouraging, but not by a lot and I was already really worried about him coming into the year.

 

With all of the teams needing pitching help and signing and/or trading for pitchers with arm problems and lesser success, I can't believe someone wouldn't have traded for him.

 

Taking a flyer on him because he can at least give innings and giving up something good for him are two very different things

Posted

 

Well this is just made up nonsense, he was a mess last year.

 

Kyle had two problems last year: he basically stopped being able to miss bats, and while he still was a soft contact guy a higher proportion of the hard contact he did allow was in the air. Combine those two factors and he got donged into oblivion.

 

This year he's missing bats again, but his groundball rate is evaporating and he's giving up hard contact at a little more than a league average rate. IMO the former is more encouraging than the latter is discouraging, but not by a lot and I was already really worried about him coming into the year.

 

With all of the teams needing pitching help and signing and/or trading for pitchers with arm problems and lesser success, I can't believe someone wouldn't have traded for him.

 

Taking a flyer on him because he can at least give innings and giving up something good for him are two very different things

 

I think a team needing a #4 starter would have given us something "pretty good" (which is what I said). Now we're stuck with him and Heyward on the books for next year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...