Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Week 1/NFL Kickoff - Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears - Thursday 9/5 at 7:20 on NBC


  • Replies 226
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
If Trubisky continues to play poorly in Denver is it time to bench him?

No. Chase Daniel is hot garbage and there is no point in playing him. Make Mitch play all year, whether he sucks, struggles or improves.

Posted
Counterpoint to all the playcalling complaints:

 

Running the ball is dumb and pointless and you should only do it to run out the clock when you're winning. Passing is awesome and wins games, if you're good at it. And if you're not, you deserve to lose anyway so who cares.

 

It wasn't about just running it more. Many of the pass plays that were called were of basically the same concept. Look 10 yards down the field. If that pass isn't available, force it anyway or dump it. There was no attempt to spread the field in the entire first half. The safeties were leaning forward on every play call because every play that was called was in front of them. You brag about having all of this amazing speed (Cohen, Gabriel, Patterson) and you do absolutely nothing with it. Maybe the coach knows more about Trubisky than we do, and that spreading the field is just not an option with this QB. If that's the case, it's going to be a long season.

 

I'm not nearly enough of an expert to assign an exact percentage live, but I'm pretty sure that not going down the field wasn't playcalling but rather a combination of the offensive line not giving him any time and Trubisky panicking and checking down too early.

 

how good is GB's Dline anticipated to be? Was last night a harbinger of our Olines season ahead, or GB's Dline?

Posted

 

It wasn't about just running it more. Many of the pass plays that were called were of basically the same concept. Look 10 yards down the field. If that pass isn't available, force it anyway or dump it. There was no attempt to spread the field in the entire first half. The safeties were leaning forward on every play call because every play that was called was in front of them. You brag about having all of this amazing speed (Cohen, Gabriel, Patterson) and you do absolutely nothing with it. Maybe the coach knows more about Trubisky than we do, and that spreading the field is just not an option with this QB. If that's the case, it's going to be a long season.

 

I'm not nearly enough of an expert to assign an exact percentage live, but I'm pretty sure that not going down the field wasn't playcalling but rather a combination of the offensive line not giving him any time and Trubisky panicking and checking down too early.

 

how good is GB's Dline anticipated to be? Was last night a harbinger of our Olines season ahead, or GB's Dline?

They definitely sunk a lot of resources into improving it. This is an improved Packers D, and assuming Rodgers was also just dealing from the rust of no preseason as well, this Packers team will compete for the division crown again.

Posted
If Trubisky continues to play poorly in Denver is it time to bench him?

No. Chase Daniel is hot garbage and there is no point in playing him. Make Mitch play all year, whether he sucks, struggles or improves.

Yep.

 

Next year though, would be great to bring in a young QB behind Mitch. Don't need to spend 5M again on a coach in pads. Let's get a possible contingency plan to making an average QB one of the highest paid players in the game in 2 years. Replacing Mitch with cheap, but adequate QB play is probably the only way to extend the window if Mitch isn't making that leap.

Posted
If Trubisky continues to play poorly in Denver is it time to bench him?

No. Chase Daniel is hot garbage and there is no point in playing him. Make Mitch play all year, whether he sucks, struggles or improves.

Yep.

 

Next year though, would be great to bring in a young QB behind Mitch. Don't need to spend 5M again on a coach in pads. Let's get a possible contingency plan to making an average QB one of the highest paid players in the game in 2 years. Replacing Mitch with cheap, but adequate QB play is probably the only way to extend the window if Mitch isn't making that leap.

It sucks with such a lack of draft picks but it's almost a requirement to draft a QB in each of the next two drafts*

 

 

*assuming no dramatic turnaround from trubisky

Posted

No. Chase Daniel is hot garbage and there is no point in playing him. Make Mitch play all year, whether he sucks, struggles or improves.

Yep.

 

Next year though, would be great to bring in a young QB behind Mitch. Don't need to spend 5M again on a coach in pads. Let's get a possible contingency plan to making an average QB one of the highest paid players in the game in 2 years. Replacing Mitch with cheap, but adequate QB play is probably the only way to extend the window if Mitch isn't making that leap.

It sucks with such a lack of draft picks but it's almost a requirement to draft a QB in each of the next two drafts*

 

 

*assuming no dramatic turnaround from trubisky

Yup.

Posted

 

I'm not nearly enough of an expert to assign an exact percentage live, but I'm pretty sure that not going down the field wasn't playcalling but rather a combination of the offensive line not giving him any time and Trubisky panicking and checking down too early.

 

how good is GB's Dline anticipated to be? Was last night a harbinger of our Olines season ahead, or GB's Dline?

They definitely sunk a lot of resources into improving it. This is an improved Packers D, and assuming Rodgers was also just dealing from the rust of no preseason as well, this Packers team will compete for the division crown again.

 

It's improved however, there were plenty of openings to be exploited, average to good QB play would have put way more than 3 points on the scoreboard.

Posted

 

how good is GB's Dline anticipated to be? Was last night a harbinger of our Olines season ahead, or GB's Dline?

They definitely sunk a lot of resources into improving it. This is an improved Packers D, and assuming Rodgers was also just dealing from the rust of no preseason as well, this Packers team will compete for the division crown again.

 

It's improved however, there were plenty of openings to exploited, average to good QB play would have put way more than 3 points on the scoreboard.

10 points, maybe, with that play calling.

Posted
This whole thing where the ST coach tells Nagy a number for Pinero and he won't attempt kicks beyond that distance strikes me as incredibly bizarre. So if it was a 51 yard FG to win the game, they punt or go for it? What's the point on having this guy on the roster if you can't trust him to make a 51 yard kick in perfect conditions?
Posted
This whole thing where the ST coach tells Nagy a number for Pinero and he won't attempt kicks beyond that distance strikes me as incredibly bizarre. So if it was a 51 yard FG to win the game, they punt or go for it? What's the point on having this guy on the roster if you can't trust him to make a 51 yard kick in perfect conditions?

 

I missed that. Who is deciding what this number will be, and how are they making that determination?

Posted (edited)
This whole thing where the ST coach tells Nagy a number for Pinero and he won't attempt kicks beyond that distance strikes me as incredibly bizarre. So if it was a 51 yard FG to win the game, they punt or go for it? What's the point on having this guy on the roster if you can't trust him to make a 51 yard kick in perfect conditions?

Was just watching the presser. He clearly states there's of course variability, and brought up the game winning kick scenario as an obvious one where you bend the rule or whatever.

 

I don't know if it was perfect conditions. There was definitely some wind and according to Nagy, had it been in the other direction, 51 was in play, so they were going in the bad direction I guess.

 

However, if 49-50 was your limit they did a poor job of maybe setting up something more manageable (or conversely opening up your 3rd and 4th down playbooks instead of 4th and 10). I think there was a penalty too that pushed them back.

Edited by WrigleyField 22
Posted
This whole thing where the ST coach tells Nagy a number for Pinero and he won't attempt kicks beyond that distance strikes me as incredibly bizarre. So if it was a 51 yard FG to win the game, they punt or go for it? What's the point on having this guy on the roster if you can't trust him to make a 51 yard kick in perfect conditions?

 

I missed that. Who is deciding what this number will be, and how are they making that determination?

Tabor. Based on pregame prep/kicks.

Posted (edited)
This whole thing where the ST coach tells Nagy a number for Pinero and he won't attempt kicks beyond that distance strikes me as incredibly bizarre. So if it was a 51 yard FG to win the game, they punt or go for it? What's the point on having this guy on the roster if you can't trust him to make a 51 yard kick in perfect conditions?

 

I missed that. Who is deciding what this number will be, and how are they making that determination?

Tabor. Based on pregame prep/kicks.

 

I can see the value in that communication, ie the stc telling the hc what your kicker is good for based on wind, field conditions, rain, etc on a game-to-game basis especially at Soldier Field. It doesn't seem that weird to me, it seems prudent. Its probably done often throughout the league but it's being highlighted by the press because of the field goal issues the bears had last year.

Edited by minnesotacubsfan
Posted
This whole thing where the ST coach tells Nagy a number for Pinero and he won't attempt kicks beyond that distance strikes me as incredibly bizarre. So if it was a 51 yard FG to win the game, they punt or go for it? What's the point on having this guy on the roster if you can't trust him to make a 51 yard kick in perfect conditions?

Was just watching the presser. He clearly states there's of course variability, and brought up the game winning kick scenario as an obvious one where you bend the rule or whatever.

 

I don't know if it was perfect conditions. There was definitely some wind and according to Nagy, had it been in the other direction, 51 was in play, so they were going in the bad direction I guess.

 

However, if 49-50 was your limit they did a poor job of maybe setting up something more manageable (or conversely opening up your 3rd and 4th down playbooks instead of 4th and 10). I think there was a penalty too that pushed them back.

 

 

yup

Posted
I guess I had never heard that process articulated before. His comments from last night just kinda struck me as odd, like his hands were tied.

I don't think the though process is odd, he's just a much more open book than Lovie or Fox were. And Trestmam would have probably gotten very philosophical about it. So it's been a while since we had this mix of openness and straightforwardness than were used to as Bears fans.

 

His hands were tied only so much in he obviously wants to respect the autonomy of his coaches even though it's clearly his call to override what they say, if he wants.

Posted
What's extra fun is that since this was a Thursday game, we get a few extra days of bitching and moaning before we see more game action

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...