Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The hopeful Cub fan side of me still says Lester will age more gracefully than Scherzer and handle a decline in stuff better. Scherzer gives up so many fly balls and so few homers. That won't last as he gets older and loses a little velo.

 

Not saying I wouldn't rather have Scherzer right now, but that's how I'll rationalize it. Plus, maybe Donnie Dewees will be awesome!

Posted

i wouldn't have a problem with this being so utterly wrong if it wasn't stated so confidently as if it originated from a legitimate authority on the subject

 

*shrug* believe what you want. Historically, pitchers don't show the same steady rise through their first few years in the big leagues that hitters do, and while there is a decline phase for those who make it that far, many don't last long enough for it to come up.

 

So while there is still a bit of a curve to it, the pitching aging "curve" is much flatter.

 

Meanwhile, pitchers tend to show sudden leaps and declines in performance more often than hitters. The leaps are usually correlated with an overnight improvement in command, the declines with arm attrition.

 

Our whole organizational philosophy is based around these ideas.

Posted
what i believe is that you're just making this up as you go. if the age curve is flatter, why don't we see the volatility you describe in older pitchers, say age 30+?
Posted
what i believe is that you're just making this up as you go. if the age curve is flatter, why don't we see the volatility you describe in older pitchers, say age 30+?

 

I honestly don't care in the slightest what you believe, and it is not my job to alleviate your ignorance.

Posted

hey hey no need to get emotional. after all, it's not like i'm asking you to cite an article

 

's comments section you aped your unsupportable "insights" from

Old-Timey Member
Posted
what i believe is that you're just making this up as you go. if the age curve is flatter, why don't we see the volatility you describe in older pitchers, say age 30+?

 

I honestly don't care in the slightest what you believe, and it is not my job to alleviate your ignorance.

 

You guys should stop being so emotionally abusive to Kyle. Why are you all out to get him?

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
Guests
Posted

http://www.bleachernation.com/2015/07/19/if-you-werent-paying-attention-jon-lesters-been-a-top-20-pitcher-this-year-and-other-bullets/

 

Lester’s numbers in his last 7 starts: 1.97 ERA, 2.19 FIP, 3.03 xFIP over 45.2 innings with 46 strikeouts and just 11 walks and 28 hits.

 

Lester’s 3.06 FIP is 21st best in baseball (just ahead of Michael Wacha) and his 3.11 xFIP is 15th best in baseball (just ahead of Carlos Martinez). By WAR (2.5), Lester has been the 19th most valuable starter in baseball this year.
Posted
http://www.bleachernation.com/2015/07/19/if-you-werent-paying-attention-jon-lesters-been-a-top-20-pitcher-this-year-and-other-bullets/
Lester’s 3.06 FIP is 21st best in baseball (just ahead of Michael Wacha) and his 3.11 xFIP is 15th best in baseball (just ahead of Carlos Martinez). By WAR (2.5), Lester has been the 19th most valuable starter in baseball this year.

barely top-100 if you care about actual runs given up

Posted
that's because bWAR sucks

did you see this on a bumper sticker?

 

it's irritatingly Pollyannaish (and typical Brett) to make the claim "Jon Lester's Been a Top-20 Pitcher This Year" willfully ignoring major components to the job of a pitcher, most of which he's been bad or terrible at

 

FIP is ignorant of these facts:

- Lester has been 32nd percentile amongst qualified starters in strand rate

- Lester has been 37th percentile amongst qualified starters in babip (41st percentile in hard-hit rate / 29th percentile in LD%)

- Lester has allowed the 2nd-most SB for pitchers

 

by the same stupid theoretical logic, Raisel Iglesias has been really swell/ginchy, too

Guest
Guests
Posted
just because FIP misses on some guys doesn't mean it's always wrong when there's a disparity between it and actual runs allowed. i mean that's the whole [expletive] point of defensive independent stats.
Posted

the point of defensive independent stats is to have better (E)RA prediction, but that matters not one iota for purposes of a conversation purely focused on describing past events

 

unless you're making some argument that there was highly anomalous defensive performance, i guess

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...