Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Guest
Guests
Posted
Well, we were all pretty stoked about the return they were going to get for Dempster before the NTC fiasco, so without that obstacle I would think you could expect value along those lines if you're wanting to connect the two.
  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted
And fairly or not, I think Garza is perceived much more positively than Dempster.
Posted

Give me Skaggs, Bradley, Eaton, Holmberg, and Davidson. Assuming Arizona laughs, just extend him and be happy. Then go get him some longterm rotation help.

 

I'd say there's about a 0.0001% chance Shark gets dealt, because it'd likely take something fairly close to that to make us trade him.

Posted

 

what's so bad about this? samardzija isn't really good enough/young enough to say that you absolutely don't trade him. you listen to offers, and if they start throwing around names like bradley and skaggs then maybe there's something to work on.

Posted
Give me Skaggs, Bradley, Eaton, Holmberg, and Davidson. Assuming Arizona laughs, just extend him and be happy. Then go get him some longterm rotation help.

 

I'd say there's about a 0.0001% chance Shark gets dealt, because it'd likely take something fairly close to that to make us trade him.

 

 

What if they come back with Skaggs/Bradley and one of the other 3 whoever you prefer? That's pretty tempting to me.

Posted

 

what's so bad about this? samardzija isn't really good enough/young enough to say that you absolutely don't trade him. you listen to offers, and if they start throwing around names like bradley and skaggs then maybe there's something to work on.

 

His age is relative given how different his pitching career has been to this point; there's less wear and tear. And he's looking to be good enough that, yes, unless they're going to give away the farm you're not going to trade him. It's a bad article for bringing him up in the first place because it's simply not realistic that he would be traded.

Posted
The first of many last starts, no doubt.

 

Speaking of which!

 

@georgeofman: If Garza pitches well today, don't be shocked if he's traded over the weekend. Rangers really want him.

 

Martin Perez or Leonys Martin would make me irrationally happy. Of course I'd be pretty happy with Roughned Odor as a secondary piece as well.

Posted
Who would we be targeting in a trade with the Rangers? I really don't know their system.

For me, the top target is clear, C Jorge Alfaro. After that, Luke Jackson would be nice. Cody Buckel seems to have completely forgotten how to pitch, so buying low on him would be nice. Those three for Garza wouldn't be bad at all. Don't know if the Rangers are desperate enough to give up Alfaro though.

Posted
This morning from PSD's ABTY -

Hearing first domino will fall prior to 7/7... Multiple talks in advanced stages including Villanueva deal to an NL Central team...

 

My $'s on the Bucs. With 3/5 of their starting rotation DL'd he's the perfect guy to fill in, and if/when everyone's back, he's a nice long reliever. The same could be said for the Reds, but for Carlos' sake, I hope not.

Posted
Give me Skaggs, Bradley, Eaton, Holmberg, and Davidson. Assuming Arizona laughs, just extend him and be happy. Then go get him some longterm rotation help.

 

I'd say there's about a 0.0001% chance Shark gets dealt, because it'd likely take something fairly close to that to make us trade him.

 

 

What if they come back with Skaggs/Bradley and one of the other 3 whoever you prefer? That's pretty tempting to me.

 

I come back and ask for 2 more. Maybe offer to toss them one of our scraps along with him. There's 0.000 reason to trade Smardz, and it's in our best interest to hang on to him. This being said, full leverage is a wonderful thing, so there's no harm in a bit of dialogue.

Posted
I still would rather trade Garza for Skaggs or something along those lines and keep Shark.

 

It's not that simple. A good chunk of Smardz' value is tied to his having 2 full years under team control. If the D Backs are willing to give up Skaggs for 2-3 months of Garza, then nice work if you can get it.

Posted
I still would rather trade Garza for Skaggs or something along those lines and keep Shark.

 

It's not that simple. A good chunk of Smardz' value is tied to his having 2 full years under team control. If the D Backs are willing to give up Skaggs for 2-3 months of Garza, then nice work if you can get it.

 

Well they were willing to give up Bauer for a whole lot less. Unless people actually think Didi Gregorius is the 2nd coming of Derek Jeter like the D-Backs do.

Posted (edited)
The first of many last starts, no doubt.

 

Speaking of which!

 

@georgeofman: If Garza pitches well today, don't be shocked if he's traded over the weekend. Rangers really want him.

 

Martin Perez or Leonys Martin would make me irrationally happy. Of course I'd be pretty happy with Roughned Odor as a secondary piece as well.

 

 

I dunno, I think a lot of luster has worn off Martin Perez.

Edited by Elrhino
Guest
Guests
Posted
I still would rather trade Garza for Skaggs or something along those lines and keep Shark.

 

It's not that simple. A good chunk of Smardz' value is tied to his having 2 full years under team control. If the D Backs are willing to give up Skaggs for 2-3 months of Garza, then nice work if you can get it.

 

Well they were willing to give up Bauer for a whole lot less. Unless people actually think Didi Gregorius is the 2nd coming of Derek Jeter like the D-Backs do.

 

Less than Samardzija or less than 2-3 months of Garza?

 

Either way, I made fun of them like everyone else, but Gregorius is pretty damn good.

Posted (edited)
I still would rather trade Garza for Skaggs or something along those lines and keep Shark.

 

It's not that simple. A good chunk of Smardz' value is tied to his having 2 full years under team control. If the D Backs are willing to give up Skaggs for 2-3 months of Garza, then nice work if you can get it.

 

Well they were willing to give up Bauer for a whole lot less. Unless people actually think Didi Gregorius is the 2nd coming of Derek Jeter like the D-Backs do.

 

Less than Samardzija or less than 2-3 months of Garza?

 

Either way, I made fun of them like everyone else, but Gregorius is pretty damn good.

 

Gregorius has been pretty good this year, I'll admit. But that trade was pure lunacy. Trading away one of the best pitching prospects in all of baseball for a guy who just popped up on the Top 100 at #80? Obviously the D-Backs didn't agree with Bauer's methods and they wanted him gone, but they could've gotten a much better package and everyone knew it, but they were blinded by their gritty grit grit grit team building approach.

 

But everything is coming out smelling like roses for them at the moment, so... more power to em

 

EDIT: That being said, the D-Backs have a glut of pitching prospects. Skaggs has been less than stellar during the starts they've given him, and the D-Backs are 1st in their division and in need of a serious arm. Their collective ERA of all their starters not named Patrick Corbin is 4.82. That's awful. Corbin's ERA is bringing the team total down to 4.15. Only Milwaukee's rotation ERA is worse than that 4.82. D-Backs need a big arm, and I'd be willing to bet they'd let Skaggs go for someone like Garza given that they can fall back on guys like Bradley, Holmberg, Delgado, etc. Giving up Skaggs to fill a huge hole in your rotation with Garza might be something they would be willing to do if they get desperate enough/start to slip a bit.

Edited by The Logan
Posted
I'm pretty sure I said at the time the the cackling at the Diamondbacks was overdone. MLB teams don't use public farm system rankings.

 

Yes, I know. That didn't make it any less ridiculous at the time.

Guest
Guests
Posted
It's also very easy to have that hindsight when Gregorius goes from a .267/.319/.375/.694 MiLB line(including .243/.288/.427 at AAA) to .291/.355/.427/.782 at the MLB level. I think he's more Alex Cintron than Elvis Andrus, personally.
Posted

It is a baseball front office's job at a fundamental level to find things that consensus rankings and slash lines don't.

 

Looks to me like it's possible the Diamondbacks did a good job of selling high and buying low.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...