Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
This draft has been so vastly different than the last two. Two years ago we pretty much knew we were taking Almora by this point and last year we knew it would be 1 of 3. This year it could end up being 1 of about 10 different guys and I wouldn't be the least bit shocked. I just have no idea what to expect and the draft is only 8 days away.
  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted
My reason for not wanting Nola is that he has a lower ceiling (#3 starter) than you'd like at 1.4 but he still has the risk of severe injury.
Guest
Guests
Posted
Devil's avocado: That's the thinking that let Wacha get all the way to 19 in 2012. When it comes to guys thought to be Top 15-20 pitchers, especially in this year's draft, I'm skeptical of definitive talk on their ceilings unless they just simply don't have MLB velocity(which doesn't seem to be the case for Nola).
Posted
Devil's avocado: That's the thinking that let Wacha get all the way to 19 in 2012. When it comes to guys thought to be Top 15-20 pitchers, especially in this year's draft, I'm skeptical of definitive talk on their ceilings unless they just simply don't have MLB velocity(which doesn't seem to be the case for Nola).

 

Nice job auto correct.

Guest
Guests
Posted
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6cs0fOqy91rxrz00o1_500.gif
Posted
I don't see how Nola can't be a #2. I mean he's 94-95 and his numbers appear to be very impressive this year. If his pitches have some movement and he has good control he could be a Garza level pitcher couldn't he? I mean, what is it about Nola where people he's only got Travis Wood type ceiling?
Posted
Yeah, with the hitters they have coming I really just want 1-2 pitchers from this draft who are almost guaranteed to make the Majors and be decent within 2 years.

 

In what world could you ever draft two such pitchers in one draft?

 

Being "decent" in 2 years is a bad phrase. But a couple guys with high floors from college ranks.

 

I'd rather draft one of those HS pitchers with high ceilings with our 2nd round pick. One of them is bound to be around.

Posted
I don't see how Nola can't be a #2. I mean he's 94-95 and his numbers appear to be very impressive this year. If his pitches have some movement and he has good control he could be a Garza level pitcher couldn't he? I mean, what is it about Nola where people he's only got Travis Wood type ceiling?

It's been posted here, but the thinking is most college pitchers lost a few MPH moving from 5-6 days rest to 4 days rest. Most feel he's only 88-91 as a MLB pitcher.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Velo alone doesn't give you a plus or plus-plus pitch. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being labeled a "3" on the true scouting scale. There are about 10 "1's" and not that many more "2's".

 

Where Nola fails to generate more than a 3 on that scale is the lack of a plus-plus pitch. He grades out as a 60 or so on multiple offerings. But nothing more than that. The thing that he DOES have that can change things up and it's acknowledged quite a bit-He does have plus-plus command. Which could turn him into more than a 3.

Posted
Velo alone doesn't give you a plus or plus-plus pitch. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being labeled a "3" on the true scouting scale. There are about 10 "1's" and not that many more "2's".

 

Where Nola fails to generate more than a 3 on that scale is the lack of a plus-plus pitch. He grades out as a 60 or so on multiple offerings. But nothing more than that. The thing that he DOES have that can change things up and it's acknowledged quite a bit-He does have plus-plus command. Which could turn him into more than a 3.

 

I see, thanks. So is MLB accurate 60 fb/ 50 slider / 60 ch?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Velo alone doesn't give you a plus or plus-plus pitch. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being labeled a "3" on the true scouting scale. There are about 10 "1's" and not that many more "2's".

 

Where Nola fails to generate more than a 3 on that scale is the lack of a plus-plus pitch. He grades out as a 60 or so on multiple offerings. But nothing more than that. The thing that he DOES have that can change things up and it's acknowledged quite a bit-He does have plus-plus command. Which could turn him into more than a 3.

 

I see, thanks. So is MLB accurate 60 fb/ 50 slider / 60 ch?

 

I'm not a scout, by any stretch. It's subjective. Aaron Fitt, at BA, would disagree with those numbers for sure. Certain reports I've seen have the SL at a 60 and the CH at a 50. I've seen reports that his hard curve is a 60 pitch. But I guess the general consensus says he's not got a plus-plus pitch or just overwhelming stuff, in general.

Posted
Is Nola's change up really only a 50-60 on most people's boards? I had heard a few people say he had the best one in the draft. If so, that's really disappointing.
Old-Timey Member
Posted

Hey this is Jon heyman from twitter who are you drafting

 

Uhhh nick Gordon?

 

Sounds good thanks!

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Most reports have had Nola at 90-93, with Fitt's being the only one that really pegged him consistently in the mid 90s. Throwing every five days he's likely be an 89-92 MPH guy in the majors.
Guest
Guests
Posted
Most reports have had Nola at 90-93, with Fitt's being the only one that really pegged him consistently in the mid 90s. Throwing every five days he's likely be an 89-92 MPH guy in the majors.

 

Yeah, he was 91-93 most of the season. It was nice that he held the higher velocity all game in the SEC Tournament but that was definitely an exception. If he was 94-96 all season, he probably wouldn't make it to 1.4 with good reason.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Devil's avocado: That's the thinking that let Wacha get all the way to 19 in 2012. When it comes to guys thought to be Top 15-20 pitchers, especially in this year's draft, I'm skeptical of definitive talk on their ceilings unless they just simply don't have MLB velocity(which doesn't seem to be the case for Nola).

 

Fair enough... And I can definitely see a situation where Nola succeeds in the bigs.

 

But would you be willing to draft him instead of a college hitter?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Devil's avocado: That's the thinking that let Wacha get all the way to 19 in 2012. When it comes to guys thought to be Top 15-20 pitchers, especially in this year's draft, I'm skeptical of definitive talk on their ceilings unless they just simply don't have MLB velocity(which doesn't seem to be the case for Nola).

 

Fair enough... And I can definitely see a situation where Nola succeeds in the bigs.

 

But would you be willing to draft him instead of a college hitter?

 

Not directed at me, but in THIS draft? Sure. I think Conforto is the hitter I like the most, but I'm not enamored with any of them.

 

I think I'm to the point that if one of the 3 pitchers doesn't make it to us.....I'd make phone calls to Nola, Pentecost, Zimmer, Jackson, Gordon, Conforto, Freeland, Newcomb, Turner, Hoffman, Holmes, Schwarber, and Toussaint and take whoever is willing to take the least amount. With the intent on finding 2 mill in savings from slot.

Posted
Devil's avocado: That's the thinking that let Wacha get all the way to 19 in 2012. When it comes to guys thought to be Top 15-20 pitchers, especially in this year's draft, I'm skeptical of definitive talk on their ceilings unless they just simply don't have MLB velocity(which doesn't seem to be the case for Nola).

 

Fair enough... And I can definitely see a situation where Nola succeeds in the bigs.

 

But would you be willing to draft him instead of a college hitter?

When Conforto is the fallback option? For me, absolutely. I've wanted Nola at #4 (assuming Rodon and Aiken are gone) since Hoffman went down.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Devil's avocado: That's the thinking that let Wacha get all the way to 19 in 2012. When it comes to guys thought to be Top 15-20 pitchers, especially in this year's draft, I'm skeptical of definitive talk on their ceilings unless they just simply don't have MLB velocity(which doesn't seem to be the case for Nola).

 

Fair enough... And I can definitely see a situation where Nola succeeds in the bigs.

 

But would you be willing to draft him instead of a college hitter?

 

Personally I'll probably feel better with any hitter, but I trust the FO enough not to be bummed out by any pitcher relative to another unless they go way off the reservation.

Guest
Guests
Posted

Yeah, I know davell and wekim want pitchers but Tranny has been banging the college hitter drum for a while so I was curious with him specifically.

 

Devil's avocado: That's the thinking that let Wacha get all the way to 19 in 2012. When it comes to guys thought to be Top 15-20 pitchers, especially in this year's draft, I'm skeptical of definitive talk on their ceilings unless they just simply don't have MLB velocity(which doesn't seem to be the case for Nola).

 

Fair enough... And I can definitely see a situation where Nola succeeds in the bigs.

 

But would you be willing to draft him instead of a college hitter?

 

Personally I'll probably feel better with any hitter, but I trust the FO enough not to be bummed out by any pitcher relative to another unless they go way off the reservation.

 

Fair enough, I probably am in the same boat.

Guest
Guests
Posted

This is from an ESPN Insider piece by Chris Crawford but Arguello quoted this part:

 

"If Aiken, Rodon and [Tyler] Kolek are off the board, I don't think you can take a pitcher," an AL East crosschecker said. "Two months ago you had [Jeff] Hoffman and [Tyler] Beede as options, but I think those are off the table. If they're fortunate enough to have [Aiken, Rodon or Kolek] fall to them, they're golden, but if not, they're going to have to get creative. They certainly have the right guys in the front office to do that, though."

 

http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=mlb-draft&id=1784&src=desktop&rand=ref~%7B%22ref%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagonow.com%2Fcubs-den%2F2014%2F05%2Fis-there-really-a-chance-aiken-or-rodon-slips-to-the-cubs-here-are-the-scenarios%2F%22%7D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...