Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Who is the #10 prospect (Run-Off)?  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the #10 prospect (Run-Off)?

    • Pierce Johnson
      23
    • Josh Vitters
      28


Posted

This is a tie-breaking run-off vote between Pierce Johnson and Josh Vitters for the Cubs #10 prospect (serious votes only, please!). Please post your rationale below. The loser of the run-off vote will be the #11 prospect.

 

If someone convinces you that the other player should be higher, please feel free to change your vote anytime between now and Monday.

 

Results so far:

 

#1: Javier Baez

#2: Jorge Soler

#3: Albert Almora

#4: Arodys Vizcaino

#5: Dan Vogelbach

#6: Brett Jackson

#7: Juan Paniagua

#8: Christian Villanueva

#9: Dillon Maples

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Vitters:

 

I don't know but PJ is still quite a ways away. There is still a lot for him to prove. Vitters has shown a propensity for adjusting to each level. I say if he can, (Y/N,70/30?) he would be much higher than this.

 

Bill

Posted

Johnson is really intriguing, and I think could easily move quickly in the rankings just by pitching some innings. But at this point with as few pro innings he has still seems like a wild card.

 

Vitters on the other hand is close to major league ready while still being young. His value may revolve largely around his ability to stick at 3B, but he has quite a bit of hitting ability, even if the approach isn't there and may never be.

 

I'm going Vitters, but Johnson isn't far behind because I think he could easily be top 5 after next season. Just want to see more innings first.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
Vitters. It's easy to forget that he's only 23, and did very well in AAA. Still, I'm willing to let him feast on AAA and AAAA pitching for another year and then 2014 will be piss or get off the pot time. If by then he's not at least showing signs of being a serviceable big leaguer, time to move on.
Posted
I really don't believe that Vitters will improve his approach enough to hit in MLB. Voted Johnson because I think his floor is higher.

 

No pitcher's floor is higher than a player who has already reached the big leagues.

Posted
no prospect has a high floor

 

but josh vitters is probably lousy so JOHNSON

 

This. Vitters is a poor defensive 3B who has never demonstrated the offensive ability to be acceptable lower down on the positional spectrum. Vitters is much closer to the bigs than Johnson, but in Josh's case that really just means that he's just closer to being lousy at the big league level.

Posted
Vitters. I still am a believer he can hit ML pitching and he's still young. The adjustments/struggles when being promoted have already been touched upon. His hit tool is real and he's closer to the big leagues and plays a position that is hard to fill with even average players league wide. Johnson is far off, not that much younger than Vitters.
Posted

I didn't realize Johnson had significant injury questions. I was mainly referring to him being a solid bullpen piece if he doesn't stick in a rotation.

 

And I really, really dislike yours and others' assertions that every pitcher's floor is the DL in perpetuity. For projection purposes, that's pretty intellectually dishonest, and a total cop-out. However, if he really does have durability concerns, I'll amend my statement to "I'll be damned if Josh Vitters is ever a contributor at the major league level."

Posted

CSC, Johnson had a strained forearm that robbed him of most of his junior year at Missouri State. He showed he was healthy right before the draft and also professionally in the minors, but forearm strains have often been precursors to Tommy John surgery.

 

All that said, I voted Johnson.

Posted

Vitters.

 

I believe in the hit tool and think the power will continue to improve.

 

I'd like to see Johnson get through a complete season healthy before putting him ahead of players who have already performed well at AAA at an appropriate age.

Posted
Johnson, but I've been voting Johnson for a long time.
Posted
Pierce Johnson. This is about where I have him anyways, so it's not a case, for me, of liking Johnson a lot more. That said, I'm not much of a believer in Vitters ability to be potentially better than an average offensive third baseman in the bigs, and his defense at 3rd is clearly, much as I've defended it at times, below average. Johnson is a polished college arm. If you believe in the quality of the breaking ball, that is, if you believe the breaking ball is plus, the combination of pedigree and stuff arguably should put him, even with his health concerns, far higher on this list.
Posted
Vitters cracking the top-10 would make me way too sad about the state of our system, so Johnson obviously

Yes, it sucks to have 22 year olds that put up a .859 OPS in AAA.

Posted
Vitters cracking the top-10 would make me way too sad about the state of our system, so Johnson obviously

Yes, it sucks to have 22 year olds that put up a .859 OPS in AAA.

 

At a position that half the league is scrambling to fill.

Posted
Vitters cracking the top-10 would make me way too sad about the state of our system, so Johnson obviously

Yes, it sucks to have 22 year olds that put up a .859 OPS in AAA.

 

At a position that half the league is scrambling to fill.

 

Including the Cubs.

 

I'm still troubled by the decision to bring up Vitters but not play him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...