Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Do we think Brett can be a successful starter if he has a 30% K rate in the majors?

 

Over 600 PA's, that is 180 K's. It would take a .357 BABIP to hit .250.

 

To answer the question, I think it's possible. He clearly sees enough pitches to draw quite a few walks over a full season. Being a plus defender would certainly help. I don't think he'll ever hit .250, but that doesn't mean he can't start, either.

  • Replies 325
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I'm thinking Chris Young (DBacks) is a good higher end comp for Brett Jackson.

I can see that, but does Jackson have 25-30HR power like Young? Doesn't he profile to be more of a 15-20HR guy at best?

Posted
I'm thinking Chris Young (DBacks) is a good higher end comp for Brett Jackson.

 

I think that's a pretty good comparison. Jackson doesn't have the raw speed or power of Young, but I could see Jackson putting up some 2008 and 2011-2012 Chris Young seasons. Not super exciting and far from the best player on a really good team, but still worthwhile.

Posted
Do we think Brett can be a successful starter if he has a 30% K rate in the majors?

 

Over 600 PA's, that is 180 K's. It would take a .357 BABIP to hit .250.

 

To answer the question, I think it's possible. He clearly sees enough pitches to draw quite a few walks over a full season. Being a plus defender would certainly help. I don't think he'll ever hit .250, but that doesn't mean he can't start, either.

 

he'd only need a .357 babip to hit .250 if you assume he's going to hit zero home runs

Posted
Do we think Brett can be a successful starter if he has a 30% K rate in the majors?

 

Over 600 PA's, that is 180 K's. It would take a .357 BABIP to hit .250.

 

To answer the question, I think it's possible. He clearly sees enough pitches to draw quite a few walks over a full season. Being a plus defender would certainly help. I don't think he'll ever hit .250, but that doesn't mean he can't start, either.

 

he'd only need a .357 babip to hit .250 if you assume he's going to hit zero home runs

 

I'm projecting 15 inside the parkers...

 

Good point though.

Guest
Guests
Posted

Some fun with stupidly small sample sizes. Jackson has 54 PA which can be segmented in half perfectly.

 

First 27 PA: .125/.222/.125, 3 BB, 14 K

Last 27 PA: .240/.296/.520, 2 2B, 1 3B, 1 HR, 2 BB, 11 K

Posted
All I know is he had a damn good series and we should be happy about it. I am starting to think Drew Stubbs may be an accurate comp, minus a little power.
Posted
All I know is he had a damn good series and we should be happy about it. I am starting to think Drew Stubbs may be an accurate comp, minus a little power.

 

Plus a lot of Ks and lower BA/OBP.

Stubbs career line is .245/.317/.398. 559k's in 1911 PA. when all is said and done, I think I can envision Brett's line in that general area. And honestly, maybe a bit more SLG. Thought Stubbs hit for more power than that. That's a tad under a 30% K rate, I'm not sure we'll be seeing Brett get down(ha) to quite that low.

Posted

jackson's zips: .247/.330/.424 (28.9% K)

stubbs' zips: .239/.310/.398 (29.4% K)

 

hilariously, right now he's virtually league average offensively (for wOBA) with 43% K's...and a 34% LD rate

 

nothing about him makes any sense; this guy is my favorite player in baseball right now

Posted

one more thing: Jackson's plate discipline has been other-worldly to this point

 

amongst qualified hitters, only Albert Callaspo and Carlos Santana have offered at fewer pitches out of the zone (full list) than his 20.6% figure, but that isn't really passivity at all, since he's swung at pitches within the zone at an extremely high rate (71.1%)

 

no other player who has swung at less than 25% of pitches outside the strike zone has also swung at more than 70% of pitches in the zone; basically, he's doing everything right, but making contact when he swings (74.4% zone-contact, which would place worst in baseball)...an obvious caveat is SSS, but he's not being overmatched in terms of pitch recognition right now

 

so, if his mechanics are screwed up and somewhat correctable, he can surely be a MLB-caliber player offensively

 

to me, this is the new front office's first big litmus test in player development and i can't wait to see how it turns out

Posted
I think Brett is going to be given much more attention than Vitters by the FO. He's got way too many positives to not figure out the one gigantic negative. And the way sneakypower just worded that, makes me feel that much better about us getting him to succeed longterm.
Posted

He struck out 34% of the time in AAA and 43% of the time in the majors so far. This is not some minor flaw to be papered over.

 

The BA and OBP have settled in about where they probably will long-term. All he has to do is keep hitting HRs in 25% of his FBs and we're golden for a league-average OPS.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...