Chicago Bears Offseason 2012

[Soul]

Same. I won't miss CBMB much.

[Guest]

Let me rephrase... if I resurrect it, will you guys put on the full court press to recruit to the site?

[Magnetic Curses]

yes

[Guest]

Preference:

 

Dedicated bears site or 312?

[jersey cubs fan]

I probably wouldn't venture from here.

[Magnetic Curses]

it really doesn't matter

[Mark Priors Calves]

I probably wouldn't venture from here.

me too

[Sammy Sofa]

"dabears.com?" Ugh. Sounds like the football version of bleedcubbieblue.com. Fuckin' dorks.

[Banedon]

"dabears.com?" Ugh. Sounds like the football version of bleedcubbieblue.com. [expletive]' dorks.

 

Bad name. Decent community.

[davell]

As a Cubs, Bulls, and Bear fan, in that order, I get enough football and basketball talj here honestly. The only other team I post on another board for is UNC. And considering most of you guys are in Illinois, or Big 10 country, I totally get why I need to go elsewhere for that one.......For pro sports though, this place gives me more than enough.

[Butterscup1679666578]

I probably wouldn't venture from here.

me too

 

same

[Guest]

How about a bears (and bulls & hawks perhaps) subforum and then gradually rebranding nsbb if you're not happy with a site called north side baseball having other sports and teams covered?

[Guest]

How about a bears (and bulls & hawks perhaps) subforum and then gradually rebranding nsbb if you're not happy with a site called north side baseball having other sports and teams covered?

Another option. The only downside I see here is that bears/sox fans might not want to come here to talk Bears if they get inundated with Cubs stuff.

[WrigleyField 22]

How about a bears (and bulls & hawks perhaps) subforum and then gradually rebranding nsbb if you're not happy with a site called north side baseball having other sports and teams covered?

Another option. The only downside I see here is that bears/sox fans might not want to come here to talk Bears if they get inundated with Cubs stuff.

My opinion, this isn't a high traffic board, so more sub-boards isn't necessary. Would rather consolidate discussions, so its easier to switch between discussions.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Guest]

How about a bears (and bulls & hawks perhaps) subforum and then gradually rebranding nsbb if you're not happy with a site called north side baseball having other sports and teams covered?

Another option. The only downside I see here is that bears/sox fans might not want to come here to talk Bears if they get inundated with Cubs stuff.

My opinion, this isn't a high traffic board, so more sub-boards isn't necessary. Would rather consolidate discussions, so its easier to switch between discussions.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"View Active Topics" is your friend. Or it should be.

[WrigleyField 22]

How about a bears (and bulls & hawks perhaps) subforum and then gradually rebranding nsbb if you're not happy with a site called north side baseball having other sports and teams covered?

Another option. The only downside I see here is that bears/sox fans might not want to come here to talk Bears if they get inundated with Cubs stuff.

My opinion, this isn't a high traffic board, so more sub-boards isn't necessary. Would rather consolidate discussions, so its easier to switch between discussions.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"View Active Topics" is your friend. Or it should be.

Actually when I'm on my phone I use the Tapatalk function that showsjust new topics. Is this a function on a normal browser too? I end up reading mostly from my phone.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Guest]

How about a bears (and bulls & hawks perhaps) subforum and then gradually rebranding nsbb if you're not happy with a site called north side baseball having other sports and teams covered?

Another option. The only downside I see here is that bears/sox fans might not want to come here to talk Bears if they get inundated with Cubs stuff.

My opinion, this isn't a high traffic board, so more sub-boards isn't necessary. Would rather consolidate discussions, so its easier to switch between discussions.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"View Active Topics" is your friend. Or it should be.

Actually when I'm on my phone I use the Tapatalk function that showsjust new topics. Is this a function on a normal browser too? I end up reading mostly from my phone.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, there's a link called "View Active Topics" that works much like that, but actually does a better job filtering threads with recent activity than Tapatalk.

[sneakypower]

even still, there are 18 boards, i feel like you could consolidate them into 10 or fewer before adding another one

[SpongeWorthy]

I feel like more threads in less subboards engenders more discussion. Catch all threads are good in theory but I think they tend to stagnate things.

[WrigleyField 22]

I feel like more threads in less subboards engenders more discussion. Catch all threads are good in theory but I think they tend to stagnate things.

You don't even need catch all threads. For instance in Social you could easily have 5 threads for the top 5 discussed tv shows and still not clutter the board.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[minnesotacubsfan]

Oh I totally disagree, I like the current set up. The more broken up the board is, the better Edited August 21, 2012 by minnesotacubsfan

[minnesotacubsfan]

and boy, come to think of it, another board or two, breaking up nsbb, would probably go along way to expanding the community. Edited August 21, 2012 by minnesotacubsfan

[cubbyvirus00]

I'm a huge Bears fan and I would support the move to a new board. I think that the discussion would be much more in depth then just a single thread on NSBB.

 

NSBB is primarily all about the Cubs anyways.

[UMFan83]

I'm a huge Bears fan

 

Could have fooled me

[Sammy Sofa]

Shut up, he's willing to move!