Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
All I remember is hating the Marquis signing, hating the money Soriano was getting but loving that the Cubs had him and going "zah?!?!?" over the DeRosa signing.
  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The whole point of this is that Rothschild does deserve some credit for turning Lilly into the pitcher he is today.

 

No he doesn't. He didn't do anything as a Cub that he didn't do before being a Cub. I undervalued his ability to perform in the AL East.

Posted
All I remember is hating the Marquis signing, hating the money Soriano was getting but loving that the Cubs had him and going "zah?!?!?" over the DeRosa signing.

 

I was completely conflicted on the Soriano contract. I hated the deal as a whole but was happy they at least had a quality bat in the OF. It was something like being resigned to the fact that Hendry's inability to get hitters before 2007 meant we pretty much had to accept Soriano if we wanted to see them do anything the next couple years.

Posted
All I remember is hating the Marquis signing, hating the money Soriano was getting but loving that the Cubs had him and going "zah?!?!?" over the DeRosa signing.

 

I was completely conflicted on the Soriano contract. I hated the deal as a whole but was happy they at least had a quality bat in the OF. It was something like being resigned to the fact that Hendry's inability to get hitters before 2007 meant we pretty much had to accept Soriano if we wanted to see them do anything the next couple years.

 

I remember the same. It's just that now we're in Sori contract hell -- the hell we all knew was coming and here it is. Nothing to do now but hope his dropoff is not steep, and ride out the years until he finally goes.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
So pitching coaches aren't that important because they don't automatically have final say on when a pitcher leaves the game, even if the manager can give them that ability? There's plenty of other responsibilities that make a pitching coach important over when to take a pitcher out.

 

They aren't that important for a variety of reasons. The most obvious one is because pitching talent is what determines how well a pitcher pitches. Coaches are important at lower levels, but at the higher levels they are there for babysitting purposes more than anything. Pitchers generally come up and pitch to their ability and then slowly decline as their arms age. Your team's quality of pitching will be determined by the talent of the pitchers. Not the pitching coach.

 

I agree with you directionally, and believe there isn't enough evidence to point to any value from most pitching coaches. But there are enough examples of pitchers turning around their performance once under the watch of coaches like Duncan or Rotschild that the talented ones provide some value. You can even look at Kerry's performance before and after joining the Yankees to see a recent example.

Posted
I agree with you directionally, and believe there isn't enough evidence to point to any value from most pitching coaches. But there are enough examples of pitchers turning around their performance once under the watch of coaches like Duncan or Rotschild that the talented ones provide some value. You can even look at Kerry's performance before and after joining the Yankees to see a recent example.

 

I think Duncan has a history of getting the most out of second rate talents. Rothschild does not. He's had an amazing array of pitching talent to work with as Cubs pitching coach, as the Cubs have poured a ton of resources into pitching talents for nearly two decades now. I don't think they've come close to outperforming their ability.

Posted
I hated the Soriano signing and thought we could do better than someone with a .836 career OPS for our LF vacancy. And then factoring in that he was getting $17 million a year for that career .836 OPS and I was pretty upset.
Posted
I think Duncan has a history of getting the most out of second rate talents. Rothschild does not. He's had an amazing array of pitching talent to work with as Cubs pitching coach, as the Cubs have poured a ton of resources into pitching talents for nearly two decades now. I don't think they've come close to outperforming their ability.

 

Randy Wells, Carlos Silva, Ted Lilly and Ryan Dempster are an amazing array of talent? Because all of them pitched better after getting under Rothschild's tutelage than before.

Posted
I think Duncan has a history of getting the most out of second rate talents. Rothschild does not. He's had an amazing array of pitching talent to work with as Cubs pitching coach, as the Cubs have poured a ton of resources into pitching talents for nearly two decades now. I don't think they've come close to outperforming their ability.

 

Randy Wells, Carlos Silva, Ted Lilly and Ryan Dempster are an amazing array of talent? Because all of them pitched better after getting under Rothschild's tutelage than before.

Not to mention guys like Joe Borowski, Matt Clement, Glendon Rusch and Jerome Williams

Posted
There's a reason certain coaches (pitching and hitting) have the reputation they do, that's why guys like Rothschild, Duncan, Jaramillo, etc. are so respected. They actually get the most from a player's natural ability.
Posted
I think Duncan has a history of getting the most out of second rate talents. Rothschild does not. He's had an amazing array of pitching talent to work with as Cubs pitching coach, as the Cubs have poured a ton of resources into pitching talents for nearly two decades now. I don't think they've come close to outperforming their ability.

 

Randy Wells, Carlos Silva, Ted Lilly and Ryan Dempster are an amazing array of talent? Because all of them pitched better after getting under Rothschild's tutelage than before.

 

Ted Lilly was the same pitcher before and after. Dempster was a huge talent before he became a Cub. Carlos Silva pitched well in the past, and this season did so for a brief period of time. Randy Wells has nothing to comp up against.

Posted
There's a reason certain coaches (pitching and hitting) have the reputation they do, that's why guys like Rothschild, Duncan, Jaramillo, etc. are so respected. They actually get the most from a player's natural ability.

 

Yes, and that reason is that anybody who sticks around long enough in baseball gets a reputation for being good at what he does.

Posted
I think Duncan has a history of getting the most out of second rate talents. Rothschild does not. He's had an amazing array of pitching talent to work with as Cubs pitching coach, as the Cubs have poured a ton of resources into pitching talents for nearly two decades now. I don't think they've come close to outperforming their ability.

 

Randy Wells, Carlos Silva, Ted Lilly and Ryan Dempster are an amazing array of talent? Because all of them pitched better after getting under Rothschild's tutelage than before.

 

Ted Lilly was the same pitcher before and after. Dempster was a huge talent before he became a Cub. Carlos Silva pitched well in the past, and this season did so for a brief period of time. Randy Wells has nothing to comp up against.

 

It should be said that those same sorts of arguments could be made for most or maybe all of the successful pitchers under Duncan.

Posted
There's a reason certain coaches (pitching and hitting) have the reputation they do, that's why guys like Rothschild, Duncan, Jaramillo, etc. are so respected. They actually get the most from a player's natural ability.

 

Yes, and that reason is that anybody who sticks around long enough in baseball gets a reputation for being good at what he does.

 

I guess you're going to believe what you want to believe, but when I see coaches that are respected by players and owners throughout the majors, I tend to believe they've had an impact in helping a player maximize their natural ability.

Posted
Ted Lilly was the same pitcher before and after. Dempster was a huge talent before he became a Cub. Carlos Silva pitched well in the past, and this season did so for a brief period of time. Randy Wells has nothing to comp up against.

 

Lilly as a Blue Jay: 4.52/1.411

Lilly as a Cub: 3.70/1.144

Lilly as a Yankee: 4.65/1.320

His BB/9 dropped by about 2 per 9 when he came to the Cubs. There's simply no support for him being the same pitcher pre-Cub and during his Cub tenure.

 

Dempster as a Marlin: 4.64/1.326

Dempster as a Cub: 3.67/1.321

In 2 years with the Reds, his numbers were even worse than with the Marlins. As a Cub, his H/9, BB/9 and K/9 were all a point better as a Cub than as a Marlin. His HR/9 has also been slightly better (.8 as a Cub to 1.1 as a Marlin).

 

On Silva, he has had similar seasons in the past, but he'd been horrid the past two years in a better pitcher's park and most of his peripherals are better than they've been in half a decade or more. He's a different pitcher now, that's pretty clear.

 

On Wells, he had 359 mediocre minor league seasons. He comes under Rothschild's tutelage and he's all of a sudden a very solid pitcher for the same length of time. Maybe he just figured it out all on his own, but that seems pretty coincidental that he'd blossom randomly like that and it not have anything at all to do with Rothschild.

Posted
I think Duncan has a history of getting the most out of second rate talents. Rothschild does not. He's had an amazing array of pitching talent to work with as Cubs pitching coach, as the Cubs have poured a ton of resources into pitching talents for nearly two decades now. I don't think they've come close to outperforming their ability.

 

Randy Wells, Carlos Silva, Ted Lilly and Ryan Dempster are an amazing array of talent? Because all of them pitched better after getting under Rothschild's tutelage than before.

Not to mention guys like Joe Borowski, Matt Clement, Glendon Rusch and Jerome Williams

 

Matt Clement was a really talented guy. Talent/stuff was never the problem.

Posted
Anyone think that with the Yankees hiring Rothschild that a trade of Zambrano to the Yanks becomes a little easier? Greases the skids? More possible now than ever.

 

no. nor should we seek to trade zambrano.

 

Looks to be more than conjecture.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...