Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 481
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Let's make Russell the guy who comes in before the other team scores the winning runs.

 

Caridad can do the mop up duty after we've already lost

Posted

Considering the payroll Hendry had the past 3 years and the product it produced, I cant imigine the next one being worse.

 

Look around baseball. In no way am I fan of Hendry keeping his job, but look at how many GM's simply are not very good at their jobs.

 

This is true, but a lot of them, dont come close to the payroll that Hendry has had to work with. Also, the fact that Hendry caters way too much to Lous every whim. I know I dont need to bring up the dismanteling of the 2008 team because of 3 bad games.

Posted
Theriot groundout, Fuku walk, Lee flyout to the track, Aram flyout to the track

No way.

 

Theriot groundout, Fuku walk, Lee Double (fuku scores), Aram lines out to center and the CF drops the ball so Lee goes to third but the ump calls it an out anyway and double's Lee off.

Posted
The moral of the story is when you have good starting pitching, but an absolutely pathetic offense, you need a good set up man.

 

The actual moral of that story is that if you truly have a pathetic offense the other two are pretty redundant.

the great debate here is which one is worse ourr offense in late innings or our BP. Flip a coin

 

I don't know but 18 runs in 6 games doesn't typically cut it. You're looking at a 486 run season if that continued, which it won't.

 

Most relievers are crappy pitchers (thus they are relievers). Crappy pithers will allow runs from time to time (duh). Those couple of runs they've allowed late wouldn't matter if the Cubs could hit.

Posted

Considering the payroll Hendry had the past 3 years and the product it produced, I cant imigine the next one being worse.

 

Look around baseball. In no way am I fan of Hendry keeping his job, but look at how many GM's simply are not very good at their jobs.

 

This is true, but a lot of them, dont come close to the payroll that Hendry has had to work with. Also, the fact that Hendry caters way too much to Lous every whim. I know I dont need to bring up the dismanteling of the 2008 team because of 3 bad games.

Even if it is true, you can't keep a guy around just because the next guy could be worse.

Posted
The moral of the story is when you have good starting pitching, but an absolutely pathetic offense, you need a good set up man.

 

The actual moral of that story is that if you truly have a pathetic offense the other two are pretty redundant.

the great debate here is which one is worse ourr offense in late innings or our BP. Flip a coin

 

I don't know but 18 runs in 6 games doesn't typically cut it. You're looking at a 486 run season if that continued, which it won't.

 

Exactly. This is why I picked the offense in the poll recently posted here asking what we were most concerned about going into the season. If the offense can't bounce back from how anemic it looked last year then they're toast. The team has just gotten older and Soriano and Soto are by no means locks to be significantly better. If they can't rebound then the only realistic improvements you can see are Aramis (hopefully) staying more healthy and Byrd, and neither are enough to carry the team.

Posted

Considering the payroll Hendry had the past 3 years and the product it produced, I cant imigine the next one being worse.

 

Look around baseball. In no way am I fan of Hendry keeping his job, but look at how many GM's simply are not very good at their jobs.

 

This is true, but a lot of them, dont come close to the payroll that Hendry has had to work with. Also, the fact that Hendry caters way too much to Lous every whim. I know I dont need to bring up the dismanteling of the 2008 team because of 3 bad games.

Even if it is true, you can't keep a guy around just because the next guy could be worse.

 

Right, which is why nobody has suggested that.

Posted

 

Exactly. This is why I picked the offense in the poll recently posted here asking what we were most concerned about going into the season. If the offense can't bounce back from how anemic it looked last year then they're toast. The team has just gotten older and Soriano and Soto are by no means locks to be significantly better. If they can't rebound then the only realistic improvements you can see are Aramis (hopefully) staying more healthy and Byrd, and neither are enough to carry the team.

I agree with this, but I'm very afraid that we will be close enough that Jim will try and make a trade to save his job. I really don't want him trading away any prospects.

Posted
The moral of the story is when you have good starting pitching, but an absolutely pathetic offense, you need a good set up man.

 

The actual moral of that story is that if you truly have a pathetic offense the other two are pretty redundant.

the great debate here is which one is worse ourr offense in late innings or our BP. Flip a coin

 

I don't know but 18 runs in 6 games doesn't typically cut it. You're looking at a 486 run season if that continued, which it won't.

 

Most relievers are crappy pitchers (thus they are relievers). Crappy pithers will allow runs from time to time (duh). Those couple of runs they've allowed late wouldn't matter if the Cubs could hit.

 

Very true. This bullpen is far from ideal, but you just to look to last year where a very average, serviceable bullpen was tagged as being "bad" because it was routinely exposed by a largely ineffective offense that left them with way too many close games.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

We really need to find some way to trick Fuku into thinking every month is April.

 

In other news, the Turkish word for April is Nisan. I think that's silly. Carry on.

Posted
Looking at the positives from the first week, the starting pitching, save opening day, has been northing short of spectacular. The offense has underperformed. I expect it to still be below average but much better than what we've seen so far. We probably are going to win more than 75 games this year. How much more has yet to be decided. More likely closer to 80 wins than 90, but nothing is out of the realm of possibility yet.
Posted

 

Exactly. This is why I picked the offense in the poll recently posted here asking what we were most concerned about going into the season. If the offense can't bounce back from how anemic it looked last year then they're toast. The team has just gotten older and Soriano and Soto are by no means locks to be significantly better. If they can't rebound then the only realistic improvements you can see are Aramis (hopefully) staying more healthy and Byrd, and neither are enough to carry the team.

I agree with this, but I'm very afraid that we will be close enough that Jim will try and make a trade to save his job. I really don't want him trading away any prospects.

 

Yeah, I'm concerned that they're just going to middle around technically being in contention because of how bad the division is. If they do fall out of it it needs to be big so that both Hendry gets the boot and they wise up and look to move Lee/Aramis/Lilly/etc..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...