2010 BBWAA HOF Ballot

[AlwaysaCub]

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4693591

 

The following players are on the ballot:

 

Roberto Alomar

Kevin Appier

Harold Baines

Bert Blyleven

Ellis Burks

Andre Dawson

Andres Galarraga

Pat Hentgen

Mike Jackson

Eric Karros

Ray Lankford

Barry Larkin

Edgar Martinez

Don Mattingly

Fred McGriff

Mark McGwire

Jack Morris

Dale Murphy

Dave Parker

Tim Raines

Shane Reynolds

David Segui

Lee Smith

Alan Trammell

Robin Ventura

Todd Zeile

 

15 New faces, including Edgar DH Martinez, Barry Larkin, "Spittin" Roberto Alomar, Kevin Appier, Todd Zeile, our good buddy Eric Karros, and the great Shane Reynolds. The First three will be seriously considered, but maybe one will get in.

 

Tim Raines would be nice to see in the Hall, but he'll need several years to build momentum.

 

David Segui is out of place on this list.

[Derwood]

Alomar (minus spitting) is a no-brainer. But the spitting will get blown completely out of proportion and overshadow his entire career (in the eyes of the voters)

[OleMissCub]

Raines, Larkin, Alomar, Trammell, Dawson, Blyleven

[rocket]

Alomar, Blyleven, Larkin, McGwire, Raines, and Trammell.

[Clem Fandango]

The Edgar Martinez vote is going to be crucial

[AlwaysaCub]

I don't think Edgar Martinez gets in for a while. Voters will look at him, see that he was perhaps the third best player on the Mariners for much of his time there, overshadowed at times by Griffey, the Unit, and Arod. Add in that he was a DH and those teams underacchieved their front line talent, and there are too many black marks.

 

Hell of a hitter though, he should get in eventually.

[kujay]

I've lost track, is it a Veteran's Committee voting year?

[NCCubFan]

I've lost track, is it a Veteran's Committee voting year?

I don't think so. I believe they vote in odd-numbered years.

[erik316wttn]

I think Lee Smith would get some consideration from the voters.

[SouthSideRyan]

Roberto Alomar

Bert Blyleven

Barry Larkin

Fred McGriff

Mark McGwire

Tim Raines

Alan Trammell

 

That's off the top of my head. Feel free to convince me otherwise.

[Derwood]

I think Larkin is borderline.

[OleMissCub]

I think Larkin is borderline.

 

Maybe personally you feel that way, but there's no way he isn't a first ballot guy given what voters look at: He's extremely popular in the baseball community, a MVP award, multiple gold gloves at SS, nearly a career .300 hitter, 12 All-Star games. He's a lock.

[Derwood]

I think Larkin is borderline.

 

Maybe personally you feel that way, but there's no way he isn't a first ballot guy given what voters look at: He's extremely popular in the baseball community, a MVP award, multiple gold gloves at SS, nearly a career .300 hitter, 12 All-Star games. He's a lock.

 

he's pretty low on the Gray Ink test (if you put any weight into that)

 

he's also far behind in most HoF stat milestones. We'll see how the vote goes

 

Ironically, he won the MVP in 1995, but finished 12th in the voting in 1996 (for a season that was far, far better)

[rocket]

edgar's stats might look a little fishy in the steroid era. not a huge power threat until age 32, biggest power season at age 37. plus, while he has amazing career slash stats, i don't think he's accumulated enough counting stats. 309 home runs isn't enough.

[OleMissCub]

he's pretty low on the Gray Ink test (if you put any weight into that)

 

he's also far behind in most HoF stat milestones. We'll see how the vote goes

 

Milestone stats don't always matter. Larkin has pretty much every single intangible (non-milestonish types of things) that get people into the hall. I forgot to add on my previous list the fact that he played his whole career with one team, which is something that voters (strangely imo) look at.

 

In my opinion, we don't to wait and see how the vote goes. He's a lock with the voters.

 

Personally, I'm up in the air about him. I could be convinced either way with good arguments.

[OleMissCub]

edgar's stats might look a little fishy in the steroid era. not a huge power threat until age 32, biggest power season at age 37. plus, while he has amazing career slash stats, i don't think he's accumulated enough counting stats. 309 home runs isn't enough.

 

He'd never get my vote just because of how awful the DH rule is to me. The voters seem to be a pretty conservative bunch and I'm sure there are plenty who hate the DH as much as me.

[CubbieBum]

edgar's stats might look a little fishy in the steroid era. not a huge power threat until age 32, biggest power season at age 37. plus, while he has amazing career slash stats, i don't think he's accumulated enough counting stats. 309 home runs isn't enough.

 

He'd never get my vote just because of how awful the DH rule is to me. The voters seem to be a pretty conservative bunch and I'm sure there are plenty who hate the DH as much as me.

 

The DH to me is like voting for a non-kicker/punter ST's player in the NFL. Were they really good at that particular part of the game? Of course but every HOFer and even many non-HOFer's would have been just as good or better if they got to play on ST's/DH. Imagine what Griffey could have done if he didn't have to play the field once he go to Cinci or Bonds once his knee started to fail. Every pretty good hitter could have done as well or better than Martinez if they got to play only DH just as Ray Lewis would dominate if he played ST's.

[TruffleShuffle]

Roberto Alomar

Bert Blyleven

Barry Larkin

Mark McGwire

Tim Raines

Alan Trammell

[rocket]

edgar's stats might look a little fishy in the steroid era. not a huge power threat until age 32, biggest power season at age 37. plus, while he has amazing career slash stats, i don't think he's accumulated enough counting stats. 309 home runs isn't enough.

 

He'd never get my vote just because of how awful the DH rule is to me. The voters seem to be a pretty conservative bunch and I'm sure there are plenty who hate the DH as much as me.

 

The DH to me is like voting for a non-kicker/punter ST's player in the NFL. Were they really good at that particular part of the game? Of course but every HOFer and even many non-HOFer's would have been just as good or better if they got to play on ST's/DH. Imagine what Griffey could have done if he didn't have to play the field once he go to Cinci or Bonds once his knee started to fail. Every pretty good hitter could have done as well or better than Martinez if they got to play only DH just as Ray Lewis would dominate if he played ST's.

 

not at all. there's been plenty of full time dh's who don't come close to approaching edgar's production.

 

using that logic, pitchers in the al shouldn't be eligible for the hall.

[NewUserName]

I think the case for Larkin is not much stronger than the case for Trammell. Has Trammell even come close?

[SouthSideRyan]

I think the case for Larkin is not much stronger than the case for Trammell. Has Trammell even come close?

 

No, it's criminal how little support he gets while honks like Gossage and Morris just keep bitching until people let them in despite the fact that their woefully underqualified.

[NewUserName]

I think the case for Larkin is not much stronger than the case for Trammell. Has Trammell even come close?

 

No, it's criminal how little support he gets while honks like Gossage and Morris just keep bitching until people let them in despite the fact that their woefully underqualified.

 

I agree, I think both Trammell and Larkin are HOF worthy. I just wonder if some more recent SS's offensive numbers have hindered them getting into the Hall. I think one thing that will help Larkin over Trammell is that Larkin was considered the best SS in the NL for much of his career. Trammell was never considered to be nearly as good as Ripken.

[SouthSideRyan]

I think the case for Larkin is not much stronger than the case for Trammell. Has Trammell even come close?

 

No, it's criminal how little support he gets while honks like Gossage and Morris just keep bitching until people let them in despite the fact that their woefully underqualified.

 

I agree, I think both Trammell and Larkin are HOF worthy. I just wonder if some more recent SS's offensive numbers have hindered them getting into the Hall. I think one thing that will help Larkin over Trammell is that Larkin was considered the best SS in the NL for much of his career. Trammell was never considered to be nearly as good as Ripken.

 

I think they'll be some steroid backlash to help Larkin since he's "clean"

[NCCubFan]

.....honks like Gossage......

Imagine, a goose honking. :D

[TruffleShuffle]

I think the case for Larkin is not much stronger than the case for Trammell. Has Trammell even come close?

 

No, it's criminal how little support he gets while honks like Gossage and Morris just keep bitching until people let them in despite the fact that their woefully underqualified.

 

sadly, larkin has a decent shot at getting in on the first ballot while trammell is getting 1/4 of the vote every year. in reality they were both very good players who probably deserve an equal shot at the hall.