Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Seriously, he looked great in the WBC today. If he continues to look that good and stays healthy through a couple more games, I'd like for the Cubs to inquire what it would take to sign him. Obviously, I wouldn't want them to go more than one year to get it done. But I'd opt for Pedro over Schilling at this point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you would want to see a little more from him than 1.2 innings against the Netherlands before any decisions were made. I'm not against the possibility but I would want to see him throw more often (either innings or semi-regular work) against more accomplished hitters.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Guests
I think you would want to see a little more from him than 1.2 innings against the Netherlands before any decisions were made. I'm not against the possibility but I would want to see him throw more often (either innings or semi-regular work) against more accomplished hitters.

 

uh...here was the original post again...

 

Seriously, he looked great in the WBC today. If he continues to look that good and stays healthy through a couple more games, I'd like for the Cubs to inquire what it would take to sign him. Obviously, I wouldn't want them to go more than one year to get it done. But I'd opt for Pedro over Schilling at this point.

So, yeah, I agree with what you are saying. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pedro continues to impress in the classic I would love to have him as a back end of the bullpen option like the Cardinals and Larussa have discussed recently. Getting Pedro would help push Lou to go with five starters this April which I think is in our starters best interest health wise and it pushes Heilman,Marshall ,Guadin to the pen, allowing Shark to start in Iowa for the time being.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pedro continues to impress in the classic I would love to have him as a back end of the bullpen option like the Cardinals and Larussa have discussed recently. Getting Pedro would help push Lou to go with five starters this April which I think is in our starters best interest health wise and it pushes Heilman,Marshall ,Guadin to the pen, allowing Shark to start in Iowa for the time being.

 

How does having Pedro at the back end of the bullpent push Heilman, Marshall and Gaudin to the pen and Shark to Iowa? Who is the fifth starter?

 

While this all sounds nice it is not going to work anyway IMO because Pedro is not going to take some low base, incentive laden deal. He is going to want relatively significant money guaranteed for at least a year and I don't see the Cubs doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a couple of numbers to interrupt this "Pedro is so awesome, I wish he would ask me to prom love fest."

1.57 and 1.43.

 

Yeah, Hendry is a complete incompetent idiot for not rushing to get a 37 year old that hasn't been able to stay on the mound the last 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a couple of numbers to interrupt this "Pedro is so awesome, I wish he would ask me to prom love fest."

1.57 and 1.43.

 

Yeah, Hendry is a complete incompetent idiot for not rushing to get a 37 year old that hasn't been able to stay on the mound the last 3 years.

 

Low risk high reward. Nobody is saying he should give him a large amount of money. At this point he'd likely come very cheap. What would it hurt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to get Pedro for cheap but he would never come cheap. Schilling would likely come pretty cheap because he has few other options. Pedro on the other hand has a couple options and will likely get a 10 mil deal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

supposedly he turned down $7M for this year... i don't think the price tag is as low as a lot of you might think. not that he deserves as much as he wants, but when a guy has been playing for $10m or more per year, he's often too proud to settle for $2-3m.

 

 

Where did you see that he turned down 7 mil? I was under the impression that he was having a hard time finding teams with interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

supposedly he turned down $7M for this year... i don't think the price tag is as low as a lot of you might think. not that he deserves as much as he wants, but when a guy has been playing for $10m or more per year, he's often too proud to settle for $2-3m.

 

 

Where did you see that he turned down 7 mil? I was under the impression that he was having a hard time finding teams with interest.

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/7-mil-no-good-for-pedro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a couple of numbers to interrupt this "Pedro is so awesome, I wish he would ask me to prom love fest."

1.57 and 1.43.

 

Yeah, Hendry is a complete incompetent idiot for not rushing to get a 37 year old that hasn't been able to stay on the mound the last 3 years.

 

Low risk high reward. Nobody is saying he should give him a large amount of money. At this point he'd likely come very cheap. What would it hurt?

There's nothing wrong with taking a gamble on a talented player - hell even a broken down 37 year old could be a decent experiment.

 

But don't you think that this is taking it a bit too far?

however, it is too smart of a move for hendry to make at this point
It's a smart move that makes a hell of a lot of sense.

Therefore, it won't happen.

 

That's a bit off the deep edge when there are obvious reasons why any GM would pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was hitting 91 against the Netherlands. I think some of the reactions are a bit overboard; he looked pretty good but nothing that would cause the Cubs to regret not signing him, at least not without a lot more outings like this one. Without his name, no one would have noticed. I mean Sidney Ponson was also dominant in this game...

 

Also I am enjoying watching the WBC way too much (and betting on it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was hitting 91 against the Netherlands. I think some of the reactions are a bit overboard; he looked pretty good but nothing that would cause the Cubs to regret not signing him, at least not without a lot more outings like this one. Without his name, no one would have noticed. I mean Sidney Ponson was also dominant in this game...

 

Also I am enjoying watching the WBC way too much (and betting on it)

 

 

I think people weren't paying attention to what the batters did.... they were paying attention to what Pedro did. He looked good regardless of who he was facing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...