Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
As Dusty Dvoracek's third straight season as a Bear ended on the injured reserve list Monday, one had to wonder how much of a lock he will be to make the roster for a possible fourth. At Halas Hall, coach Lovie Smith spoke optimistically about the defensive tackle being a big part of the future in Chicago, but organizations tire quickly of players who can't get through even one full season healthy. Sunday's torn biceps muscle made Dvoracek 0-for-3.

 

Who sees him suddenly turning his career around on another team next year?

 

Depends on how you define turning around his career?

 

There's a chance he doesn't become as injury prone as he been with the Bears. I don't think he'll ever be a great DT or much above what he has been wth the Bears.

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
As Dusty Dvoracek's third straight season as a Bear ended on the injured reserve list Monday, one had to wonder how much of a lock he will be to make the roster for a possible fourth. At Halas Hall, coach Lovie Smith spoke optimistically about the defensive tackle being a big part of the future in Chicago, but organizations tire quickly of players who can't get through even one full season healthy. Sunday's torn biceps muscle made Dvoracek 0-for-3.

 

Who sees him suddenly turning his career around on another team next year?

:wave:

Posted
As Dusty Dvoracek's third straight season as a Bear ended on the injured reserve list Monday, one had to wonder how much of a lock he will be to make the roster for a possible fourth. At Halas Hall, coach Lovie Smith spoke optimistically about the defensive tackle being a big part of the future in Chicago, but organizations tire quickly of players who can't get through even one full season healthy. Sunday's torn biceps muscle made Dvoracek 0-for-3.

 

Who sees him suddenly turning his career around on another team next year?

:wave:

 

Ditto :good:

Posted
As Dusty Dvoracek's third straight season as a Bear ended on the injured reserve list Monday, one had to wonder how much of a lock he will be to make the roster for a possible fourth. At Halas Hall, coach Lovie Smith spoke optimistically about the defensive tackle being a big part of the future in Chicago, but organizations tire quickly of players who can't get through even one full season healthy. Sunday's torn biceps muscle made Dvoracek 0-for-3.

 

Who sees him suddenly turning his career around on another team next year?

:wave:

 

Ditto :good:

 

If he stays injury-free, I could see him being a league-average type DT. I don't see many pro bowls in Dusty's future. If I'm wrong, more power to him.

Posted
As Dusty Dvoracek's third straight season as a Bear ended on the injured reserve list Monday, one had to wonder how much of a lock he will be to make the roster for a possible fourth. At Halas Hall, coach Lovie Smith spoke optimistically about the defensive tackle being a big part of the future in Chicago, but organizations tire quickly of players who can't get through even one full season healthy. Sunday's torn biceps muscle made Dvoracek 0-for-3.

 

Who sees him suddenly turning his career around on another team next year?

:wave:

 

Ditto :good:

 

If he stays injury-free, I could see him being a league-average type DT. I don't see many pro bowls in Dusty's future. If I'm wrong, more power to him.

 

He's looked pretty darn good when he is healthy though

Posted
As Dusty Dvoracek's third straight season as a Bear ended on the injured reserve list Monday, one had to wonder how much of a lock he will be to make the roster for a possible fourth. At Halas Hall, coach Lovie Smith spoke optimistically about the defensive tackle being a big part of the future in Chicago, but organizations tire quickly of players who can't get through even one full season healthy. Sunday's torn biceps muscle made Dvoracek 0-for-3.

 

Who sees him suddenly turning his career around on another team next year?

:wave:

 

Ditto :good:

 

If he stays injury-free, I could see him being a league-average type DT. I don't see many pro bowls in Dusty's future. If I'm wrong, more power to him.

 

He's looked pretty darn good when he is healthy though

 

Pretty darn good compared to the better DTs in the league, or just better than the other riff raff we've got? I'd agree with the latter, but I just don't see Dusty reaching that upper eschelon. Again, maybe I'm wrong.

Posted

We could do it by winning 3/4, but we would need some help.

 

GB's not out of this thing yet. Look at their schedule, it's cheese outside of the Bears game, and they slaughtered us last time out.

Posted
This team is not good. Bottom line. Beating 3 subpar teams and 1 good team doesn't change anything. We really suck.

 

You can't suck and go 10-6. This team isn't great by any stretch. But teams that go 10-6 in the NFL are absolutely legit playoff teams and going 4-0 down the stretch is in no way shape or form "backing into" the playoffs.

 

You can't suck, but you can be mediocre and be 10-6. See 2007 Cleveland Browns.

 

They won over:

Bengals (7-9)

Ravens (5-11)

Dolphins (1-15)

Rams (3-13)

Seahawks (10-6)

Ravens (5-11)

Texans (8-8)

Jets (4-12)

Bills (7-9)

49ers (5-11)

 

Winning % of teams they beat: .343 (55-105)

 

Bears have beat:

Colts (8-4)

Eagles (6-5-1)

Lions (0-12)

Vikings (7-5)

Lions (0-12)

Rams (2-10)

 

Winning % of teams they beat: .326 (23.5-48.5)

 

If they won out that would include a 4-8 team, a 6-6 team, a 5-7 team and another 5-7 team.

 

I'm not doubting their deficiencies. I'm saying it's absurd to say that a 10-6 Bears team sucks, if they end up 10-6. And winning 4 straight to end the season isn't backing into the playoffs. Take a look at the AFC East teams who have fattened up on incredibly weak divisions. Arizona is going to have the benefit of having nobody in their division, and whoever the heck wins the AFC West will have benefitted as well. The competition is the competition, if the Bears win 10 games they will be a legit playoff team. If they lose some more games and still win because Minnesota falls apart, then that would be backing in. But that's a different story.

 

You're right. Your previous comment just caused me to think about and create a comparison between the 2007 Browns and this years Bears. In the NFC, I can only definitively say that the Giants, Cowboys, Redskins, Panthers, and Buccaneers have better rosters top to bottom than the Bears. There might be a few more (Eagles, Vikings, Packers, Cardinals, Saints are up there).

 

Did you forget about the Falcons or do you think it's all been smoke and mirrors?

Posted
This team is not good. Bottom line. Beating 3 subpar teams and 1 good team doesn't change anything. We really suck.

 

You can't suck and go 10-6. This team isn't great by any stretch. But teams that go 10-6 in the NFL are absolutely legit playoff teams and going 4-0 down the stretch is in no way shape or form "backing into" the playoffs.

 

You can't suck, but you can be mediocre and be 10-6. See 2007 Cleveland Browns.

 

They won over:

Bengals (7-9)

Ravens (5-11)

Dolphins (1-15)

Rams (3-13)

Seahawks (10-6)

Ravens (5-11)

Texans (8-8)

Jets (4-12)

Bills (7-9)

49ers (5-11)

 

Winning % of teams they beat: .343 (55-105)

 

Bears have beat:

Colts (8-4)

Eagles (6-5-1)

Lions (0-12)

Vikings (7-5)

Lions (0-12)

Rams (2-10)

 

Winning % of teams they beat: .326 (23.5-48.5)

 

If they won out that would include a 4-8 team, a 6-6 team, a 5-7 team and another 5-7 team.

 

I'm not doubting their deficiencies. I'm saying it's absurd to say that a 10-6 Bears team sucks, if they end up 10-6. And winning 4 straight to end the season isn't backing into the playoffs. Take a look at the AFC East teams who have fattened up on incredibly weak divisions. Arizona is going to have the benefit of having nobody in their division, and whoever the heck wins the AFC West will have benefitted as well. The competition is the competition, if the Bears win 10 games they will be a legit playoff team. If they lose some more games and still win because Minnesota falls apart, then that would be backing in. But that's a different story.

 

You're right. Your previous comment just caused me to think about and create a comparison between the 2007 Browns and this years Bears. In the NFC, I can only definitively say that the Giants, Cowboys, Redskins, Panthers, and Buccaneers have better rosters top to bottom than the Bears. There might be a few more (Eagles, Vikings, Packers, Cardinals, Saints are up there).

 

Did you forget about the Falcons or do you think it's all been smoke and mirrors?

 

I did forget about the Falcons, but I would put them in the "maybe" category, not the "clearly better roster" category

Posted
My goodness that field is in bad shape. It looks like a thick layer of easily removable moss on top of solid dirt.
Posted

Dez Nutz!

 

Good start. I haven't heard a weather report on the broadcast, but it looks like the Jags are uncomfortable out there.

Posted
Dez Nutz!

 

Good start. I haven't heard a weather report on the broadcast, but it looks like the Jags are uncomfortable out there.

Not much wind, but the wind chill is around 5.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...