Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 336
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Community Moderator
Posted
ESPN 1000 in Chicago just reported that Hendry is trying to get a deal done for Church.

 

REALLY??? Someone should start a new thread about that...

:willynilly: :willynilly: :willynilly:
Posted
Good enough for me if no big moves can be made. I understand we have restraints so adding a guy who's proven he can have around a .900 OPS and is still fairly young (well moreso "not old" than young) for minor leaguers is a good move in my books.
Posted
ESPN 1000 in Chicago just reported that Hendry is trying to get a deal done for Church.

 

Good. Make it happen Hendry.

 

EXCELLENT

 

Soriano

Fotenot/Theriot

Lee

ARam

Church

DeRosa

Fontenot/Theriot

Kendall

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Nothing mentioned on the ESPN Radio Sports Center update, though I'm quite sure it was the national one.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

 

I don't know if I'd like giving up Murton for Church. They seem very similar, with Murton having a little more potential and maybe a little better bat and Church being a better defender and being able to play CF.

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

but id imagine that theyd keep pagan up on the big team rather than murton so he pry would go back down if church comes

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

 

I don't know if I'd like giving up Murton for Church. They seem very similar, with Murton having a little more potential and maybe a little better bat and Church being a better defender and being able to play CF.

 

Church is every bit the bat Murton is, probably better.

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

but id imagine that theyd keep pagan up on the big team rather than murton so he pry would go back down if church comes

 

unless we ship jacque off to someone first.

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

 

I don't know if I'd like giving up Murton for Church. They seem very similar, with Murton having a little more potential and maybe a little better bat and Church being a better defender and being able to play CF.

 

Church is every bit the bat Murton is, probably better.

 

Looking at the numbers, they seem very similar. I guess Church's slugging is a little better and with him playing in Washington, it might be better than it seems.

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

 

I don't know if I'd like giving up Murton for Church. They seem very similar, with Murton having a little more potential and maybe a little better bat and Church being a better defender and being able to play CF.

 

Church is every bit the bat Murton is, probably better.

 

And at a position more difficult to fill. I'd certainly give up Murton for Church if that were the option.

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

 

I don't know if I'd like giving up Murton for Church. They seem very similar, with Murton having a little more potential and maybe a little better bat and Church being a better defender and being able to play CF.

 

Church is every bit the bat Murton is, probably better.

 

agreed. i'm a huge Murton fan, but i'd probably swap those two with out hesitation.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
dude hasn't played right field once this year... how is his defense?

 

Good enough to play CF.

Posted
dude hasn't played right field once this year... how is his defense?

 

Good enough to play CF.

 

So's Jacques Jones' in theory....but he certainly isn't a very good defender.

 

...not sure about Church.

Posted
dude hasn't played right field once this year... how is his defense?

 

Good enough to play CF.

 

So's Jacques Jones' in theory....but he certainly isn't a very good defender.

 

...not sure about Church.

 

Jacque isn't that bad in center at all outside of that boot the other day...

He's not going to win any gold gloves but he's certainly adept to play there without it being considered a major defensive weakness.

Posted
it would definetly be an upgrade over what we have.

 

Would also likely be the death knell of Murton in Chicago, correct?

 

I kind of thought Church would play CF and wouldn't really effect Murton. Of course, Murton could be part of the deal.

 

I don't know if I'd like giving up Murton for Church. They seem very similar, with Murton having a little more potential and maybe a little better bat and Church being a better defender and being able to play CF.

 

Church is every bit the bat Murton is, probably better.

 

And at a position more difficult to fill. I'd certainly give up Murton for Church if that were the option.

 

That's true, but the Cubs don't really have anything to fill RF with either. I think an outfield of Soriano-Church-Murton would be our best bet. If it came down to it, I'd probably give up Murton since he won't get a shot in Chicago anyway, but it'd be best if they could get Church and keep Murton to platoon with Floyd.

Posted

 

That's true, but the Cubs don't really have anything to fill RF with either. I think an outfield of Soriano-Church-Murton would be our best bet. If it came down to it, I'd probably give up Murton since he won't get a shot in Chicago anyway, but it'd be best if they could get Church and keep Murton to platoon with Floyd.

 

Maybe Hendry can convince Bowden to take Pagan or Jones instead. :pint:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...