Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
never struck me as an exceptional CF.

 

Dewan, in the Fielding Bible, said Taveras should have won the gold glove in 2005, and Taveras ranks near the top of most advanced metrics.

 

I'm not saying I want him - far from it - if the Cubs trade for him, I'm selling all my tickets again this year - but defense is the one positive he brings.

 

I'll agree that I've always thought Taveras was a very good defensive cf.

 

What would be hilarious if we traded for Willy would be to see if Hendry still let Barrett go after next season in favor of a defensive-minded catcher. Can you imagine a bottom of the order like Taveras-Izturis-Blanco?

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Can you imagine a bottom of the order like Taveras-Izturis-Blanco?

 

I can imagine Taveras and Izturis hitting 1-2. Gotta have speed in the leadoff spot and gotta have someone who "handles the bat" (most inane baseball cliche ever) hitting second.

Posted
Can you imagine a bottom of the order like Taveras-Izturis-Blanco?

 

I can imagine Taveras and Izturis hitting 1-2. Gotta have speed in the leadoff spot and gotta have someone who "handles the bat" (most inane baseball cliche ever) hitting second.

Thank God Dusty's gone, or we'd have to endure that on a regular basis.

Posted
Can you imagine a bottom of the order like Taveras-Izturis-Blanco?

 

I can imagine Taveras and Izturis hitting 1-2. Gotta have speed in the leadoff spot and gotta have someone who "handles the bat" (most inane baseball cliche ever) hitting second.

Thank God Dusty's gone, or we'd have to endure that on a regular basis.

 

If the Cubs actually do trade for Taveras, I fully expect to see him bat first and Izturis second for at least ten games.

 

Lou loves to hit-and-run, and Izturis can really handle the bat.

Posted

Trading for Tavares might not actually be that bad of a deal.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

Izturis for Tavares?

 

Or better yet, Izturis and Jones for Hawpe and Tavares (I know, I'm dreaming...)

 

Any deal for Tavares sucks unless we're getting rid of Izturis in return...

Posted
Even for a guy like Hendry who's in love with toolsy players, what tool other than speed does Taveras have? He can't hit for power or average, regardless of that Cub series doesn't have a great arm (2 of those 3 players thown out were Aramis and Barrett), and never struck me as an exceptional CF.

 

Is speed really that damn important to the Cubs?

 

Taveras is a career .284 hitter in his first two years in the majors. He did start to show some patients at the plate last year.

 

Doesn't he have a career BABIP of like .340?

 

Yup

 

In 05 he had a .348 (with a 18.9% LD%)

In 06 he had a .332 (with a 17.5% LD%)

Posted
Even for a guy like Hendry who's in love with toolsy players, what tool other than speed does Taveras have? He can't hit for power or average, regardless of that Cub series doesn't have a great arm (2 of those 3 players thown out were Aramis and Barrett), and never struck me as an exceptional CF.

 

Is speed really that damn important to the Cubs?

 

Taveras is a career .284 hitter in his first two years in the majors. He did start to show some patients at the plate last year.

 

Doesn't he have a career BABIP of like .340?

 

Yup

 

In 05 he had a .348 (with a 18.9% LD%)

In 06 he had a .332 (with a 17.5% LD%)

 

But he's so fast that he'll always beat his expected BABIP.

 

Except when he doesn't, like Juan Pierre in 2005 and 2006.

Posted
Even for a guy like Hendry who's in love with toolsy players, what tool other than speed does Taveras have? He can't hit for power or average, regardless of that Cub series doesn't have a great arm (2 of those 3 players thown out were Aramis and Barrett), and never struck me as an exceptional CF.

 

Is speed really that damn important to the Cubs?

 

Taveras is a career .284 hitter in his first two years in the majors. He did start to show some patients at the plate last year.

 

Doesn't he have a career BABIP of like .340?

 

Yup

 

In 05 he had a .348 (with a 18.9% LD%)

In 06 he had a .332 (with a 17.5% LD%)

 

But he's so fast that he'll always beat his expected BABIP.

 

Except when he doesn't, like Juan Pierre in 2005 and 2006.

And his 2002 and 2003 :) And Pierre always had higher LD%.

Posted
never struck me as an exceptional CF.

 

Dewan, in the Fielding Bible, said Taveras should have won the gold glove in 2005, and Taveras ranks near the top of most advanced metrics.

 

I'm not saying I want him - far from it - if the Cubs trade for him, I'm selling all my tickets again this year - but defense is the one positive he brings.

 

Which would then make perfect sense for Colorado to keep him, since they have the most spacious CF in the big leagues.

 

That's what I don't understand. In Colorado (and to a lesser extent Houston) and a few other ballparks he has value because of his defensive range in CF. He might have the most range of anybody in the NL now. However, if he comes to Wrigley, his biggest asset is mostly wasted, and that just further exposes the things he cannot do with the bat.

Posted
never struck me as an exceptional CF.

 

Dewan, in the Fielding Bible, said Taveras should have won the gold glove in 2005, and Taveras ranks near the top of most advanced metrics.

 

I'm not saying I want him - far from it - if the Cubs trade for him, I'm selling all my tickets again this year - but defense is the one positive he brings.

 

Which would then make perfect sense for Colorado to keep him, since they have the most spacious CF in the big leagues.

 

That's what I don't understand. In Colorado (and to a lesser extent Houston) and a few other ballparks he has value because of his defensive range in CF. He might have the most range of anybody in the NL now. However, if he comes to Wrigley, his biggest asset is mostly wasted, and that just further exposes the things he cannot do with the bat.

 

Yeah, makes about as much sense as signing a fly ball pitcher...ohh crap.

Posted

Ugh - I was ready to put a stamp of approval on this offseason if he got Church or someone else for RF and moved Jones to CF.

 

There's still time to do the right thing, Jim!

Posted

I'm not necessarily advocating this....but is the idea of it it really as god awful as some people are saying?

 

His OBP last year is only one one hundredth less than Jones,

He plays very good defense

he's only 24, and has shown improvment in walks and OBP

in the 2nd half of the season last year his OBP was a lot closer to .350.

he's fast as hell (waiting to get flamed for acknowledging this)

 

 

I'm not at all saying we should give up a ton of good prospects for him, but the guy has some good potential to be a solid MLB player...he's not the second coming of Neifi.

Posted
I'm not necessarily advocating this....but is the idea of it it really as god awful as some people are saying?

 

His OBP last year is only one one hundredth less than Jones,

He plays very good defense

he's only 24, and has shown improvment in walks and OBP

in the 2nd half of the season last year his OBP was a lot closer to .350.

he's fast as hell (waiting to get flamed for acknowledging this)

 

 

I'm not at all saying we should give up a ton of good prospects for him, but the guy has some good potential to be a solid MLB player...he's not the second coming of Neifi.

 

Yes, it is god awful. He had a worse year than Juan Pierre. You can count on him being worse than Juan was agains this year. He's crap.

Posted
I'm not necessarily advocating this....but is the idea of it it really as god awful as some people are saying?

 

His OBP last year is only one one hundredth less than Jones,

He plays very good defense

he's only 24, and has shown improvment in walks and OBP

in the 2nd half of the season last year his OBP was a lot closer to .350.

he's fast as hell (waiting to get flamed for acknowledging this)

 

 

I'm not at all saying we should give up a ton of good prospects for him, but the guy has some good potential to be a solid MLB player...he's not the second coming of Neifi.

 

Yes, it is god awful. He had a worse year than Juan Pierre. You can count on him being worse than Juan was agains this year. He's crap.

 

Goony the kid is 24, and improved from his age 23 season...his OPS+ or whatever you referenced above may have been worse than pierre's but the guy actually had a higher OBP...and he had more walks than Pierre in almost 170 fewer at bats...., if we hypothetically got the guy, we'd not be looking for power out of him, it'd be for his defense and potential...if you stuck him in the lineup like this:

 

Soriano

Murton

Lee

Ramirez

Barrett

Derosa

Tavarez

Isturiz

Pitcher

 

You'd have a great top half of the line up and then 7-8 would be weaker, but good-great fielders....and if Tavarez were to improve at the same rate he did last year, you'd have a .340+ OBP out of him in the top 1/2 of our regular players last year.

 

Again, I'm not saying he's great by any means...just that the "i'm never watching the cubs again" comments by some above are the usual over reactions.

Posted
Ugh - I was ready to put a stamp of approval on this offseason if he got Church or someone else for RF and moved Jones to CF.

 

There's still time to do the right thing, Jim!

 

You're gonna hurt Alfonso's feelings saying things like that.

Posted

Goony the kid is 24, and improved from his age 23 season...his OPS+ or whatever you referenced above may have been worse than pierre's but the guy actually had a higher OBP...and he had more walks than Pierre in almost 170 fewer at bats

 

A ,055 IsoD is only good if you are hitting .300. Saying his patience is better than Pierre's is like saying his physique is better than Matt Stairs'.

Posted

Goony the kid is 24, and improved from his age 23 season...his OPS+ or whatever you referenced above may have been worse than pierre's but the guy actually had a higher OBP...and he had more walks than Pierre in almost 170 fewer at bats

 

A ,055 IsoD is only good if you are hitting .300. Saying his patience is better than Pierre's is like saying his physique is better than Matt Stairs'.

 

But unlike Matt Stairs' physique, its improving!

 

Again..I'm not saying the guy is great...just that at age 24, he's improving...if he continues to improve, he could be a very solid player, if his OBP would improve 8 points a year between now and age 28, he'll make a lot of money in free agency.

Posted
Goony the kid is 24, and improved from his age 23 season...his OPS+ or whatever you referenced above may have been worse than pierre's but the guy actually had a higher OBP...and he had more walks than Pierre in almost 170 fewer at bats...., if we hypothetically got the guy, we'd not be looking for power out of him, it'd be for his defense and potential...if you stuck him in the lineup like this:

 

Soriano

Murton

Lee

Ramirez

Barrett

Derosa

Tavarez

Isturiz

Pitcher

 

You'd have a great top half of the line up and then 7-8 would be weaker, but good-great fielders....and if Tavarez were to improve at the same rate he did last year, you'd have a .340+ OBP out of him in the top 1/2 of our regular players last year.

 

Again, I'm not saying he's great by any means...just that the "i'm never watching the cubs again" comments by some above are the usual over reactions.

 

Just because we "aren't looking for power out of him" doesn't mean it's okay to have absolutely none. And he doesnt' have any potential. He is what he is, which isn't good. He's the same player he was in the minors, which is nothing. The last thing the Cubs need to be doing is acquiring guys for their defense, they haven't sucked because of defense. They've sucked because their lineup has sucked and their rotation has sucked. Taveras was worse than Pierre last year. His OBP ticked higher last year, barely, it was just .008. He also had a decline in AVG and SLG. That's not a sign of a guy who's poised to show off his potential.

 

He doesn't produce worth a crap, and the Cubs don't need anymore people who don't produce. This would be a horrible acquisition, as usual.

Posted

Goony the kid is 24, and improved from his age 23 season...his OPS+ or whatever you referenced above may have been worse than pierre's but the guy actually had a higher OBP...and he had more walks than Pierre in almost 170 fewer at bats

 

A ,055 IsoD is only good if you are hitting .300. Saying his patience is better than Pierre's is like saying his physique is better than Matt Stairs'.

 

But unlike Matt Stairs' physique, its improving!

 

Again..I'm not saying the guy is great...just that at age 24, he's improving...if he continues to improve, he could be a very solid player, if his OBP would improve 8 points a year between now and age 28, he'll make a lot of money in free agency.

 

And if Ryan Church's OPS+ keeps on improving 8 points a year, he'll be a hall of famer when he reaches free agency.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...