Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Please tell me why we want Soriano over Drew. Not saying this is the consensus, but I would imagine from what the Cubs are saying Drew would be the backup option to Soriano. Soriano has had one season with an over .900 OPS (last year with .911, barely over). JD Drew has a CAREER .905 OPS. Sorano consistantly has below average OBP, and his OBP was only average last year in by far the best year of his career. I didn't see his OF skills much last year, I am told they were solid but flawed in some areas (to be expected). To me, doesn't seem anywhere near worth getting into a bidding war over.

 

All those numbers does us no good if he can't stay healthy.

 

We don't need him to stay healthy, we need him to be healthy most of the time. I think in a 5 year deal, you'd get at least 3 semi-full to full seasons out of him. And then 2 of the seasons he's going to miss some games. But that's probably why you can get him for around $14m, when Soriano might get $17-18m.

 

Look at how the Mets handled the Pedro situation. They signed him for 4 years, and pretty much acknowledged they weren't going to get 4 strong years out of him.

 

If the Cubs were a $65 million team, Drew isn't worth the risk. If they were a very good offensive ballclub, there probably isn't much reason to sign such a player. But the Cubs are desperate for a hitter that does exactly the things JD does. They need an impact bat. Their offense could be awesome with him, and all they'd need to do was try and tread water when he misses games. For all the issues he's had, JD has never crippled a team with his problems. Give JD the same profile, but make him 34 or 35 right now, and my story would probably change. But the Cubs need this type of player, and from age 31 through age 34 or 35, they should be able to get a ton of production out of him.

 

Hmmm...Good way to look at it, and if you think about it you are taking the same gamble with Aramis.

 

Yeah, but the more injury-ridden guys you have, the more chance you'll never be able to get your footing.

 

I'm not saying I wouldn't want Drew to come here. But the fact that Soriano stays healthy is definitely a positive.

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
Don't forget some injury prone players we signed in the past like Moises Alou and Michael Barrett. Both remained pretty darn healthy during their runs with the Cubs. Not saying being a Cub magically keeps players healthy (OBVIOUSLY), but just because someone has been injured often in the past doesn't mean it will hold true in the future. Edited by UMFan83
Posted
Yeah, but the more injury-ridden guys you have, the more chance you'll never be able to get your footing.

 

I'm not saying I wouldn't want Drew to come here. But the fact that Soriano stays healthy is definitely a positive.

 

It is. But the fact that Drew is routinely better than Soriano is also a positive for JD.

 

The more injury prone guys you have, the higher the odds you'll miss multiple guys at once. But the more really good guys you'll have, the higher the odds you can withstand setbacks.

Posted

Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

It's funny because normally the majority of our posters are fiscally conservative about what the Cubs are spending for big names, but now a lot of people don't care...just sign a bunch of people and worry about the negatives later.

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

If the Cubs are substantially increasing payroll, the ability to take risks with high reward players becomes greater.

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

It's funny because normally the majority of our posters are fiscally conservative about what the Cubs are spending for big names, but now a lot of people don't care...just sign a bunch of people and worry about the negatives later.

 

I've always said I'm much more willing to overspend on players that are actually really good.

 

I think a team with a payroll such as the Cubs should spend big on impact players and look for bargains with the filler.

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

It's funny because normally the majority of our posters are fiscally conservative about what the Cubs are spending for big names, but now a lot of people don't care...just sign a bunch of people and worry about the negatives later.

 

I think the majority of the posters have no problem over-spending for good players. It's the 3/13 million for DeRosa's of the world that drives everyone here crazy...

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

It's funny because normally the majority of our posters are fiscally conservative about what the Cubs are spending for big names, but now a lot of people don't care...just sign a bunch of people and worry about the negatives later.

 

I think the majority of the posters have no problem over-spending for good players. It's the 3/13 million for DeRosa's of the world that drives everyone here crazy...

 

Not everyone, I certainly saw the value in it and there were several other people that didnt have a problem with it either. Try not to speak for everyone, just because the majority agrees with you. I wasn't dancing in the streets over it but I certainly understand why he was signed even if it was slightly over paying. I think alot of people are going to be eating crow on the DeRosa signing.

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

It's funny because normally the majority of our posters are fiscally conservative about what the Cubs are spending for big names, but now a lot of people don't care...just sign a bunch of people and worry about the negatives later.

 

I think the majority of the posters have no problem over-spending for good players. It's the 3/13 million for DeRosa's of the world that drives almost everyone here crazy...

 

Not everyone, I certainly saw the value in it and there were several other people that didnt have a problem with it either. Try not to speak for everyone, just because the majority agrees with you. I wasn't dancing in the streets over it but I certainly understand why he was signed even if it was slightly over paying. I think alot of people are going to be eating crow on the DeRosa signing.

 

Fixed and I hope you're right...

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

It's funny because normally the majority of our posters are fiscally conservative about what the Cubs are spending for big names, but now a lot of people don't care...just sign a bunch of people and worry about the negatives later.

 

I think the majority of the posters have no problem over-spending for good players. It's the 3/13 million for DeRosa's of the world that drives everyone here crazy...

 

Not everyone, I certainly saw the value in it and there were several other people that didnt have a problem with it either. Try not to speak for everyone, just because the majority agrees with you. I wasn't dancing in the streets over it but I certainly understand why he was signed even if it was slightly over paying. I think alot of people are going to be eating crow on the DeRosa signing.

 

Not to turn this into another DeRosa thread, but Mike North tried to make a point today that Mr. DeRosa fit 'a little too well' in his uniform last year compared to his other years. Probably just unfounded speculation, but can't dismiss it altogether

Posted
Very interesting conversation. And I keep going back and forth with this...

 

Hell, lets just get good players and take it from there.

 

It's funny because normally the majority of our posters are fiscally conservative about what the Cubs are spending for big names, but now a lot of people don't care...just sign a bunch of people and worry about the negatives later.

 

I think the majority of the posters have no problem over-spending for good players. It's the 3/13 million for DeRosa's of the world that drives everyone here crazy...

 

Not everyone, I certainly saw the value in it and there were several other people that didnt have a problem with it either. Try not to speak for everyone, just because the majority agrees with you. I wasn't dancing in the streets over it but I certainly understand why he was signed even if it was slightly over paying. I think alot of people are going to be eating crow on the DeRosa signing.

 

Not to turn this into another DeRosa thread, but Mike North tried to make a point today that Mr. DeRosa fit 'a little too well' in his uniform last year compared to his other years. Probably just unfounded speculation, but can't dismiss it altogether

 

I might normally take that report into account if :

 

A. It didn't come from a complete and total waste of skin like Mike North and

 

B. If there weren't numerous reports of a completely new hitting approach and

 

C. There was a huge power increase inthere, which there wasn't

 

Did I mention Mike North is a raging moronic, non-sensical idiot?

Posted

I might normally take that report into account if :

 

A. It didn't come from a complete and total waste of skin like Mike North and

 

B. If there weren't numerous reports of a completely new hitting approach and

 

C. There was a huge power increase inthere, which there wasn't

 

Did I mention Mike North is a raging moronic, non-sensical idiot?

 

QFT

 

I was about to respond with something almost exactly along these lines, particularly the parts about Mike North.

Posted
I'm pretty sure I'd be a little skeptical if Mike North told me the sun came up this morning.

 

Just see what I do if he suggests the sky is blue.

Posted
Oh jeez, this comes from Mike North?

http://netgames.apollo.lv/forums/html/emoticons/whatever.gif

 

Oh my, how can you make innocent little smiley face guy do such a thing?

Posted
Oh jeez, this comes from Mike North?

http://netgames.apollo.lv/forums/html/emoticons/whatever.gif

 

Oh my, how can you make innocent little smiley face guy do such a thing?

I have powers well beyond what your mind can envision. Do not anger me or you will face my twisted smiley wrath!

Posted
Please tell me why we want Soriano over Drew. Not saying this is the consensus, but I would imagine from what the Cubs are saying Drew would be the backup option to Soriano. Soriano has had one season with an over .900 OPS (last year with .911, barely over). JD Drew has a CAREER .905 OPS. Sorano consistantly has below average OBP, and his OBP was only average last year in by far the best year of his career. I didn't see his OF skills much last year, I am told they were solid but flawed in some areas (to be expected). To me, doesn't seem anywhere near worth getting into a bidding war over.

 

All those numbers does us no good if he can't stay healthy.

 

As many others here have stated, the last three years he has played 145+ in two of them. His missed time in 2005 was due to a broken wrist on a HBP, not exactly your "injury-prone player" type of injury.

 

I AM for Drew just let me say that. But. . . that reminds me we were saying the exact same things about Prior, remember?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...