Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
that game was completely winnable. The Bulls missed like their last 30 shots (it seemed). You hold the Lakers to that few points you ought to win. It seems like the team can't get scoring from more than one guy a night
  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Even you real die hards can't tell me you aren't starting to panic a little now.

The only game the Bulls have lost so far that I didn't think they were going to lose this month is the Kings game, which they gave away.

 

I was hoping for 7-7. 6-8 or 5-9 look more likely now. Meh, it's November.

 

When they're 3-11, we'll touch base. This is an amazingly bad basketball team right now. It's not just the west coast road trip.

Like when they started 1-11 in Nov 04 and finished the season with 47 wins? Way too early -- even pointless -- to panic. But I'll stop arguing with you about it if you stop insisting I should be panicking now.

 

:D Alright.

 

If all you want to do is see the team tread water and be as good as they've been the past couple years, I could see the point in not being upset about the start. But I thought Bulls fans were expecting a huge improvement, and movement into the upper echelon of the league. It seems pretty clear to me they aren't going to be challenging for any titles. As an amateur observer, I think the Wallace signing looks pretty silly, overpaying for an old guy who isn't going to impact the team much. And they still don't have a single great player, which seems to be the most important thing to have in the NBA.

 

If you're going to be happy with a playoff appearance and early exit, I guess there's nothing to be upset about. But if you wanted them in the conference finals at the minimum, then I can't imagine why a Bulls fan would be anything but hugely disappointed.

Posted
If all you want to do is see the team tread water and be as good as they've been the past couple years, I could see the point in not being upset about the start. But I thought Bulls fans were expecting a huge improvement, and movement into the upper echelon of the league. It seems pretty clear to me they aren't going to be challenging for any titles. As an amateur observer, I think the Wallace signing looks pretty silly, overpaying for an old guy who isn't going to impact the team much. And they still don't have a single great player, which seems to be the most important thing to have in the NBA.

 

If you're going to be happy with a playoff appearance and early exit, I guess there's nothing to be upset about. But if you wanted them in the conference finals at the minimum, then I can't imagine why a Bulls fan would be anything but hugely disappointed.

I'd be surprised by the pronouncements in bold if they were made by anyone else this early. A recent article by Jim O'Brien seems a fitting reply, especially the condescending paragraph.

Posted
If all you want to do is see the team tread water and be as good as they've been the past couple years, I could see the point in not being upset about the start. But I thought Bulls fans were expecting a huge improvement, and movement into the upper echelon of the league. It seems pretty clear to me they aren't going to be challenging for any titles. As an amateur observer, I think the Wallace signing looks pretty silly, overpaying for an old guy who isn't going to impact the team much. And they still don't have a single great player, which seems to be the most important thing to have in the NBA.

 

If you're going to be happy with a playoff appearance and early exit, I guess there's nothing to be upset about. But if you wanted them in the conference finals at the minimum, then I can't imagine why a Bulls fan would be anything but hugely disappointed.

I'd be surprised by the pronouncements in bold if they were made by anyone else this early. A recent article by Jim O'Brien seems a fitting reply, especially the condescending paragraph.

 

That was before they lost by nearly 20 to the Spurs, and then stunk it up again against a real beatable LA team.

 

We'll see. For now, I will only say this: I'm real glad I didn't spend that $180 buckeroonies on NBA League Pass.

Posted
That was before they lost by nearly 20 to the Spurs, and then stunk it up again against a real beatable LA team.

Did you read that article or just look at the date?

 

Never mind; it's not important. Panic away.

Posted
I do love me some Kirk. Deng looks like he is going to break out this year.

Read that post right when Deng lost the ball. I blame you.

Posted
That was before they lost by nearly 20 to the Spurs, and then stunk it up again against a real beatable LA team.

Did you read that article or just look at the date?

 

Never mind; it's not important. Panic away.

 

What is it that you think is so evangelistic about that article? I've seen thousands written just like it when a team starts out bad. Some of them turn out to be correct, and sometimes the team just goes right on stinking.

 

Please don't assume I didn't read something just because I'm not as swayed by it as you are.

Posted (edited)
I do love me some Kirk. Deng looks like he is going to break out this year.

Read that post right when Deng lost the ball. I blame you.

I accept whatever punishment your modship decides.

It really went downhill from there...

 

That was a what, 13 point lead? Now they trail by 1 at the end of 3.

Edited by Jon
Posted
I do love me some Kirk. Deng looks like he is going to break out this year.

Read that post right when Deng lost the ball. I blame you.

I accept whatever punishment your modship decides.

It really went downhill from there...

 

Was a what, 13 point lead? Now they trail by 1 at the end of 3.

 

 

I suppose why wait for the 4th quarter to grant the Nuggets the inevitable comeback, when you can just collapse in the 3rd quarter and get it over with?

Posted

A couple more questions for those watching...

 

What happened to Deng? 20 points in the first half and none in the 3rd quarter?

 

Why do the Nuggets have all their scrubs (plus Smith) in to start the 4th quarter?

Posted
Technical foul shot for what? I can't watch so I dont know...

He "smashed the ball" after the third quarter ended, apparently.

Posted
Technical foul shot for what? I can't watch so I dont know...

He "smashed the ball" after the third quarter ended, apparently.

 

the only way that should be a T is if you literally smash the ball and it pops and they have to go get a new one

Posted
What is it that you think is so evangelistic about that article? I've seen thousands written just like it when a team starts out bad. Some of them turn out to be correct, and sometimes the team just goes right on stinking.

 

Please don't assume I didn't read something just because I'm not as swayed by it as you are.

We're done.

Posted
What is it that you think is so evangelistic about that article? I've seen thousands written just like it when a team starts out bad. Some of them turn out to be correct, and sometimes the team just goes right on stinking.

 

Please don't assume I didn't read something just because I'm not as swayed by it as you are.

We're done.

 

Guess so.

Posted
Bulls blow.

 

3-8 would tend to confirm that.

 

Maybe they'll put it together once they get off the road, I dunno. I was expecting more though. Much more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...